D3.2.13—Pedigree charts
Pedigree charts use family relationships and phenotypes to infer genotypes, carriers and likely inheritance patterns in inheritance problems in inheritance problems.
- Syllabus
- First assessment 2025
- Objective
- D3.2.13
- Level
- HL
Pedigree charts use family relationships and phenotypes to infer genotypes, carriers and likely inheritance patterns in inheritance problems in inheritance problems.

Coverage 2013–2024 · Updated 16 Jul 2026
| Pedigree mark | Meaning |
|---|---|
| square / circle | male / female in the standard convention |
| filled symbol | individual shows the tracked phenotype |
| horizontal partner line | mating or reproductive partnership |
| vertical descent line | offspring connection |
| shared sibship line | siblings from the same parents |
| I, II, III … | generations |
| 1, 2, 3 … | individuals within a generation |
A pedigree records observed family evidence, not every conception or every relative. Small families and missing records can make more than one inheritance model possible.
| Observation | Strong inference |
|---|---|
| two unaffected parents have an affected child | supports recessive inheritance; contradicts simple complete-dominant inheritance |
| affected person has an affected parent in every generation | supports dominance, but does not prove it alone |
| affected father has an affected son | contradicts X-linked transmission from father to son |
| affected sons arise from unaffected mothers | consistent with X-linked recessive carrier mothers |
| males and females affected similarly | supports autosomal inheritance |
Start with forced genotypes. For an autosomal recessive trait, affected people are aa; each unaffected parent of an affected child must carry a. For an X-linked recessive trait, an affected son XʰY proves that his mother supplied Xʰ.
Treat each inheritance mode as a hypothesis. Predict transmissions that must or cannot occur, compare them with the pedigree, and reject a model only when a relationship contradicts it.
Skipping a generation suggests recessiveness but is not a proof. Chance, incomplete records, late onset and variable expression can obscure the apparent pattern.
X and Y contributions establish the usual chromosomal starting point → unequal X-linked gene dosage changes inheritance risk → pedigrees reveal transmission across families → polygenes and environment create continuous population variation → box plots summarize centre and spread
| Evidence source | Reliable question |
|---|---|
| X-linked cross | which parent supplies the allele to sons or daughters? |
| pedigree | which inheritance hypotheses are contradicted by family relationships? |
| continuous measurements | where is the median and how wide is the middle 50%? |
| apparent outlier | biological extreme, data error or different process? |
Match the claim to the evidence scale. One Punnett grid predicts a fertilization probability, a pedigree constrains family genotypes, and a box plot describes a sample distribution; none alone proves a universal biological rule.
[ 2 ]
Explain how the pedigree chart shows that the dominant allele causing PKD is not on the X chromosome.