D4.1.7—Sexual selection
Sexual selection favours traits that increase mating success, even when those traits may reduce survival in evolving populations in evolving populations.
- Syllabus
- First assessment 2025
- Objective
- D4.1.7
- Level
- HL
Sexual selection favours traits that increase mating success, even when those traits may reduce survival in evolving populations in evolving populations.

Coverage 2013–2020 · Updated 16 Jul 2026
| Route | Selection event | Example trait |
|---|---|---|
| mate choice | one sex preferentially mates with particular partners | bright plumage or complex courtship display |
| mating competition | individuals compete directly or indirectly for access | body size, weapons, territories or dominance behavior |
heritable variation in display or competition trait → unequal mating success → unequal offspring contribution → associated alleles increase
Persistent differences in selected traits between sexes can produce sexual dimorphism, such as bright displaying males and more cryptic females.
| Effect of an exaggerated ornament | Possible fitness consequence |
|---|---|
| more visible or energetically costly | lower survival through predation or resource cost |
| attractive display or honest condition signal | greater chance of mating |
| species-specific courtship signal | mating isolation from other populations |
The trait can spread when its gain in reproductive success exceeds its survival cost. Fitness integrates the whole route to descendants, not survival alone.
Sexual selection names the pressure—competition for mates or mate choice—rather than competition for food or escape from predators.
| Evidence | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| spots increased before strong predators were added | female choice favored conspicuous males |
| mean spot number fell with C. alta | dangerous predators selected against conspicuous males |
| weak-predator field transplants became more colorful over 15 generations | reduced predation allowed sexual selection to dominate |
| spot size tracked gravel under predation | background matching improved camouflage |
Natural and sexual selection acted on the same heritable color traits in opposing directions. The observed phenotype reflected the balance of those pressures, not one universal best color.

mutation creates alleles + sexual reproduction reshuffles them → offspring vary → limited resources and abiotic or biotic pressures produce unequal survival and mating → heritable variants reach offspring unequally → population trait and allele frequencies change
| Claim to test | Evidence needed |
|---|---|
| adaptation occurred by selection | heritable variation plus unequal reproductive contribution across generations |
| sexual selection acted | trait differences predict mating success |
| environmental pressure caused change | controlled manipulation or strong comparative evidence links pressure to fitness |
| population evolved | heritable trait or allele frequency changed, not merely one individual |
Avoid purpose-driven language. Populations do not create useful mutations on demand; selection filters inherited variation already produced by mutation and recombination.
[ 6 ]
Explain what is meant by exaggerated traits and how they may develop in males of a species.