Indicative content guidance
Answers must be credited by using the level descriptors (below) in line
with the general marking guidance. The indicative content below
exemplifies some of the points that candidates may make but this does
not imply that any of these must be included. Other relevant points must
also be credited.
Knowledge, Application, Analysis, Evaluation - indicative
content
- Product differentiation is the process of distinguishing a product or
service from others, to make it more attractive to a target market
- Oppo has created an ice cream with 60% fewer calories and less
sugar than standard ice cream. Oppo claims that one portion of its
ice cream contains fewer calories than an apple - this may
differentiate them from competition and increase revenue
- It is important that Oppo differentiates its products because the
market is competitive with dominant brands and market leaders
such as Unilever and Nestlé
- The sales of low-quality ice cream have been declining, due to the
increased preference for premium ice cream. To build its brand it
is important that Oppo makes its ice cream different to stand out
in the market
- There is also an increase in demand for organic and naturally
sweet desserts due to changing social trends. Oppo uses
ingredients such as coconut oil and stevia leaf which may help
create a USP and attract new customers
- However, there are many other factors that will contribute to the
success of Oppo
- Oppo is competing with well established brands and are unlikely to
have the marketing budget and distribution channels of the major
brands. These factors are necessary to ensure Oppo succeeds and
is able to compete in the market
- It is also important that the ice cream tastes good to encourage
repeat purchase and brand loyalty. Oppo must ensure it meets the
needs of consumers by offering innovative flavours to appeal to
new segments such as the over 50's
Level
Mark
Descriptor
0
No rewardable material.
Level 1
1-2
Isolated elements of knowledge and understanding - recall based.
Weak or no relevant application to business examples.
Generic assertions may be presented.
Level 2
3-5
Accurate knowledge and understanding.
Applied accurately to the business and its context.
Chains of reasoning are presented, showing cause(s) and/or effect(s) but may be assertions or incomplete.
An attempt at an assessment is presented that is unbalanced and unlikely to show the significance of competing arguments.
Level 3
6-8
Accurate and thorough knowledge and understanding, supported throughout by relevant and effective use of the business behaviour/context.
Logical chains of reasoning, showing cause(s) and/or effect(s).
Assessment is balanced, well contextualised, using quantitative and/or qualitative information, and shows an awareness of competing arguments/factors.
Question
Indicative content