Indicative content guidance
Answers must be credited by using the level descriptors (below) in line with the general marking guidance. The indicative content below exemplifies some of the points that candidates may make but this does not imply that any of these must be included. Other relevant points must also be credited.
Knowledge, Application, Analysis, Evaluation - indicative content
- A random sample is one of the methods researchers use to choose a sample from a larger population
- This method means that there is an equal chance that
any of the subjects in a population will be chosen
- Random sampling relies on having a full list of the entire population of chefs and experts in the food industry. This
data may be difficult to collect
- It may take a considerable amount of time to gather
information from a wide range of people over a large geographical area such as China. This may prove costly
to Nando's
- It can be impractical/or not possible to use a completely random technique, e.g. the target group may be too large to assign numbers to
- Random sampling is designed to be a representative of a
community or demographic, but there is no guarantee that the data collected will be representative of restaurant personnel in China
- However, the use of random sampling is likely to remove
bias for Nando's
- Modern technology makes it much easier to create a random sample
- If the chefs and food experts are chosen at random, each individual in the food industry has the same probability of being selected
- This should create fair/balanced results which more accurately represent the larger group as a whole
Level
Mark
Descriptor
0
A completely inaccurate response.
Level 1
1-2
Isolated elements of knowledge and understanding - recall based.
Weak or no relevant application to business examples.
Generic assertions may be presented.
Level 2
3-4
Elements of knowledge and understanding, which are applied to the business example.
Chains of reasoning are presented, but may be assertions or
incomplete.
A generic or superficial assessment is presented.
Level 3
5-7
Accurate and thorough knowledge and understanding, supported throughout by relevant and effective use of the business behaviour/context.
Analytical perspectives are presented, with developed chains of reasoning, showing cause(s) and/or effect(s).
An attempt at an assessment is presented, using quantitative and/or qualitative information, though unlikely to show the significance of
competing arguments.
Level 4
8-10
Accurate and thorough knowledge and understanding, supported throughout by relevant and effective use of the business behaviour/context.
A coherent and logical chain of reasoning, showing cause(s) and/or effect(s).
Assessment is balanced, wide ranging and well contextualised, using quantitative and/or qualitative information and shows an awareness of
competing arguments/factors, leading to a supported judgement.