Indicative content guidance
Answers must be credited by using the level descriptors (below) in line
with the general marking guidance. The indicative content below
exemplifies some of the points that candidates may make but this does
not imply that any of these must be included. Other relevant points
must also be credited.
Knowledge, Application, Analysis, Evaluation - indicative
content
Primary market research is new data collected, which is specific to the
needs of the business. It is referred to as field research.
- Interviews with ice cream professionals such as Gary
Martin who had worked on the Häagen-Dazs product
range may have helped give Oppo an insight into the
ice cream market. This advice may have helped the
brothers avoid pitfalls in the industry
- Product trials have allowed Oppo to assess the products to
determine the potential success of the ice cream. Oppo was
able to gather feedback and make changes to the ice cream
before launching on a larger scale and so preventing costly
mistakes
- Selling in a few supermarkets enabled them to gather sales
data to assist with production planning for potential future
demand.
- However, using interviews may result in biased results. Many
experts told the brothers that they would not succeed in the
industry. If they had listened to this advice, they may not have
produced their winning recipe
- A disadvantage of product trials is the cost which can be
expensive and time consuming
- Selling in only a limited number of supermarkets may have
delayed the launch of new products which may mean losing
first-mover advantages
- During product trials Oppo may have run the risk of
competitors learning about their products which may be copied
and brought to the market earlier
- Results from test marketing may not be conclusive and
do not always predict success. Products that sell locally
may not sell well in other geographical areas, as
findings from the trials may not be representative of
other groups of customers
Level
Mark
Descriptor
0
A completely inaccurate response.
Level 1
1-2
Isolated elements of knowledge and understanding - recall based.
Weak or no relevant application to business examples.
Generic assertions may be presented.
Level 2
3-4
Elements of knowledge and understanding, which are applied to the business example.
Chains of reasoning are presented,but may be assertions or incomplete.
A generic or superficial assessment is presented.
Level 3
5-7
Accurate and thorough knowledge and understanding, supported throughout by relevant and effective use of the business behaviour/context.
Analytical perspectives are presented, with developed chains of reasoning, showing cause(s) and/or effect(s).
An attempt at an assessment is presented, using quantitative and/or qualitative information, though unlikely to show the significance of competing arguments.
Level 4
8-10
Accurate and thorough knowledge and understanding, supported throughout by relevant and effective use of the business behaviour/context.
A coherent and logical chain of reasoning, showing cause(s) and/or effect(s).
Assessment is balanced, wide ranging and well contextualised, using quantitative and/or qualitative information and shows an awareness of competing arguments/factors, leading to a supported judgement.
Questio
n
Answer
Mark