D4.1.8—Modelling selection
Models of selection simplify populations so changes in survival, reproduction or allele frequency can be tested and visualized in evolving populations.
- Syllabus
- First assessment 2025
- Objective
- D4.1.8
- Level
- SL
Models of selection simplify populations so changes in survival, reproduction or allele frequency can be tested and visualized in evolving populations.

Coverage 2025–2025 · Updated 16 Jul 2026
John Endler modelled natural and sexual selection in Trinidadian guppies by experimentally controlling predation pressure and gravel background.
| Controlled factor | Comparison | Selection prediction |
|---|---|---|
| Predation | No predator, weak predator, dangerous predator | Strong predation favours less conspicuous males; low predation allows female choice to favour conspicuous males |
| Gravel background | Coarse versus fine gravel | Under predation, spot size that better matches the background improves camouflage |
After dangerous predators were introduced, mean spot number decreased; with no or weak predation it continued to increase. Coarse gravel favoured larger spots and fine gravel smaller spots when predators were present.
A field transfer from a dangerous-predator site to a weak-predator site produced more colourful males over 15 generations, consistent with sexual selection becoming stronger relative to predation.
The experiment shows a trade-off: conspicuous colour can improve mating success yet reduce survival. Correlation alone is weaker evidence than Endler's controlled manipulation of selection pressures.
This objective is assessed through multiple choice, commonly using Describe / Explain.
Describe / Explain
Build the answer around this relationship: Models can show how selection changes variant frequencies over generations.
Representative question
John Endler experimented on populations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) with different colouration. A male guppy fish is shown with large spots, which makes the fish more attractive to females, but more visible to predators.
The table shows the male colouration of guppy fish and number of predators in three different ponds.
| Predator X | Predator Y | Male guppy colouration | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pond 1 | 12 | 0 | Large colourful spots |
| Pond 2 | 15 | 0 | Medium colourful spots |
| Pond 3 | 5 | 17 | None/very small drab spots |
What can be concluded from the data?
There is a positive correlation between numbers of predator X and size of spots.
Predator Y has least influence on colouration.
There is a negative correlation between number of predators and size of spots.
There is no sexual selection.
C
Core D4.1 examples follow the same causal route: heritable variation exists, a selection pressure acts, individuals differ in fitness, and alleles linked to higher reproduction become more common. Endler’s guppies and sexual selection are evidence versions of the same chain.
Core natural-selection exam answers should never stop at “the best adapted survive.” They need the chain: heritable variation exists, a named pressure acts, some individuals have higher fitness, and their alleles become more common over generations. Use this for abiotic pressure, overproduction, sexual selection, and Endler-style data.