D4.2 Stability and change
Stability and change in ecosystems depend on sustainable resource use, pollution impacts, keystone species, rewilding, and succession processes over time.
- Syllabus
- First assessment 2025
- Topic
- D4.2
- Level
- SL
Stability and change in ecosystems depend on sustainable resource use, pollution impacts, keystone species, rewilding, and succession processes over time.
Ecosystem stability is the capacity to maintain characteristic structure and function over time or recover after disturbance.
Resistance limits the immediate effect of disturbance, while resilience is the capacity to recover. Evidence from forests, deserts and other natural ecosystems shows that some recognizable systems have persisted for millions of years.
A forest can undergo seasonal population changes and recover from storms while retaining its nutrient cycling, food-web structure and dominant vegetation over long periods.
Stability means continuity of key properties, not a frozen species count or absence of all change.
Long-term ecosystem stability requires continuing energy supply, nutrient recycling, genetic diversity and climatic variables within organismal tolerance limits.
| Requirement | Why it supports stability |
|---|---|
| Energy supply, usually sunlight | Maintains primary production and food-web energy flow |
| Nutrient recycling | Returns finite chemical elements from waste and dead biomass to producers |
| Genetic diversity | Provides variation that can support population survival under disease or change |
| Climate within tolerance limits | Keeps temperature, precipitation and insolation compatible with resident species |
If prolonged drought pushes precipitation outside tree tolerances, producer biomass falls and both energy input and habitat complexity decline.
The requirements interact; meeting one cannot compensate indefinitely for failure of another.
This objective is assessed through structured response, commonly using Outline / Describe.
Outline / Describe
Build the answer around this relationship: Energy must continually enter ecosystems because it is transferred and lost rather than recycled.
Treating sustainability as a list of organisms only, without explaining energy input or nutrient recycling.
Representative question
Outline the features of ecosystems that make them sustainable.
a. recycling of nutrients/elements/components/materials
b. carbon/nitrogen/another example of recycled nutrient/element
c. decomposers/saprotrophs break down organic matter/release «inorganic» nutrients
d. energy supplied by the sun
OR
energy cannot be recycled «so ongoing supply is needed»
OR
energy is lost from ecosystems as heat
e. energy flow along food chains/through food web/through trophic levels
f. photosynthesis/autotrophs make foods/trap energy
OR
autotrophs supply the food that supports primary consumers
g. oxygen «for aerobic respiration» released by autotrophs/photosynthesis/plants
h. carbon dioxide «for photosynthesis» released by respiration
i. populations limited by food supply/predator-prey/interactions/competition OR
populations regulated by negative feedback
OR
fewer/less of each successive trophic level «along the food chain»/OWTTE
j. supplies of water from rainfall/precipitation/rivers/water cycle
A large Amazon forest area is needed to recycle atmospheric water by transpiration, causing cooling, air movement and rainfall that help maintain the forest.
Deforestation lowers transpiration and rainfall, increases drying and fire risk, and fragments habitat; further forest loss can then reinforce the original change. The minimum area needed to maintain these processes remains uncertain.
Percentagechange=((finalforestarea−initialforestarea)÷initialforestarea)×100%.Anegativeresultrepresentsforestloss.
The mapped local textbook reports 3,399,308 km² in 2017 and 3,390,835 km² in 2018: ((3,390,835 − 3,399,308) ÷ 3,399,308) × 100 = −0.25%, so estimated cover fell by 0.25%.
A proposed tipping range is uncertain, so a calculated percentage loss must not be presented as proof that an irreversible threshold has already been crossed.
A mesocosm is a contained ecosystem model used to test how a controlled variable affects stability.
| Design choice | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Sealed glass vessel preferred to an open tank | Prevents matter entering or leaving while allowing energy transfer such as light and heat |
| Aquatic or microbial community | More likely than a terrestrial system to function at small contained scale |
| Replicated control and treatment vessels | Separates the manipulated variable from background variation |
| Repeated abiotic and biotic measurements | Tracks stability, disturbance and recovery through time |
Replicated sealed aquatic mesocosms can receive different light treatments while temperature, starting organisms and nutrient quantities are held constant.
A mesocosm supports causal inference about its model conditions but does not reproduce every migration, weather event or interaction in a natural ecosystem; it also requires ethical care and maintenance.
This objective is assessed through essay response, commonly using Discuss / Outline / State.
Discuss / Outline / State / Suggest / Explain
Build the answer around this relationship: A sealed mesocosm restricts matter exchange but can still exchange energy with its surroundings.
Assuming a sealed mesocosm exchanges no energy, when light or heat can still pass between the system and surroundings.
Representative question
Mesocosm experiments using water from Narragansett Bay were completed in the laboratory during a six month period. Discuss advantages and limitations of carrying out mesocosm investigations. be marked.
Advantages of mesocosm experiments:
a. scientist can alter/manipulate/control environmental conditions
b. allows carrying out experiments with many samples / replicates
c. ease of collection of continuous data
Limitations of mesocosm experiments:
d. difficult to mimic natural environmental conditions exactly
e. Natural environments change /are not static
Needs to suggest advantage and limitation for full marks.
3 max
A keystone species has an effect on community structure much larger than its abundance would suggest.
Its predation, grazing, habitat engineering or other interaction controls competitors or resources. Removing it can trigger a trophic cascade and reduce diversity.
Predict the community change after removal by identifying the interaction the species controls.; separate state, pressure, control loop and time
Removing sea otters can allow sea urchins to increase and overgraze kelp forests, changing habitat for many species. This gives a concrete prediction from the stated ecosystem.
Keystone status is context-dependent; abundance alone does not identify a keystone species. Interpret the result within the stated model and evidence limits.
This objective is assessed through essay response, commonly using Outline / Suggest / Explain.
Outline / Suggest / Explain / Define
Build the answer around this relationship: Keystone species have effects on community structure that are disproportionate to their abundance.
Equating keystone species with the most abundant species or only with top predators.
Representative question
Explain how an ecological community structure could be affected by the removal of a keystone species.
a. «keystone species» have a main/disproportionate role in the maintenance of the structure of a community
b. not necessarily top predator/most abundant species
OR affect other organisms even if they have a small biomass/productivity
c. may impact a top-down/bottom-up control
d. «if removed» cause increase in populations of secondary consumers and decrease of primary consumers
e. «if removed» may cause loss of balance in food chain/community
f. «if removed» may cause «drastic» loss of biodiversity
OR
extinction of species
g. example of named keystone species
h. example of role in the environment where they are found
i. example of change if removed
This question can be answered by referring to one specific species
OWTTE
eg: honey bees
eg: pollinate flowers
eg: plant reproduction is reduced
6 max
A renewable-resource harvest is sustainable only when long-term removal remains below replacement and leaves a viable reproducing population.
| Resource | Evidence used to assess sustainability |
|---|---|
| Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) in managed Finnish forest | Compare timber volume removed with regrowth/replanting; survey logged and unlogged forest structure and soil disturbance |
| Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) | Use stock size, age structure, reproductive rate, juvenile recruitment and a precautionary estimate of maximum sustainable yield |
Replacement rates vary with age structure, habitat and climate, so monitoring must update quotas or harvest methods rather than treating one limit as permanent.
A renewable species is not automatically harvested sustainably; incomplete stock data and illegal or unreported removal increase uncertainty.
This objective is assessed through essay response, commonly using Discuss.
Discuss
Build the answer around this relationship: Harvesting is sustainable only when removal stays at or below the population replacement rate.
Representative question
Discuss the impact of overfishing in Lake Kariba and how sustainable harvesting of resources can be assessed.
Impact: [2 max]
a. overfishing can disrupt food chains/webs/ecosystems;
b. named example from the diagram;
c. decrease biodiversity / OWTTE;
Assessing: [2 max]
d. monitoring/measuring that the rate of harvesting of species is lower than the rate of replacement of species/OWTTE;
e. monitoring/enforcing application of regulations;
f. monitoring population size (over time)
OR
monitoring biodiversity (over time);
e. Accept monitoring of regulations, e.g., size/age of fish, number in a catch,
mesh size of nets, quotas, etc., but not setting of regulations.
4
Marking guidance:
max
Sustainable agriculture maintains food production without reducing the soil, water, biodiversity and climate conditions needed by future production.
| Factor | Sustainability question |
|---|---|
| Soil erosion | Is fertile topsoil being lost faster than it forms? |
| Nutrient leaching | Are soluble nitrates/phosphates leaving soil and polluting water? |
| Fertilizers and other inputs | Can nutrient supply and yield be maintained without growing external dependence? |
| Agrochemical pollution | Are pesticides or fertilizers harming non-target organisms and ecosystems? |
| Carbon footprint | What emissions arise from machinery, fertilizers, livestock, transport and land-use change? |
Crop rotation, soil cover and nutrient matching may reduce erosion, fertilizer demand and leaching, but yield and labour trade-offs must still be measured.
No single practice proves a farm sustainable; assessment must include outputs, inputs, pollution and long-term soil condition.
This objective is assessed through essay response, commonly using Discuss / Distinguish.
Discuss / Distinguish
Build the answer around this relationship: Harvesting crops removes nutrients, so agricultural systems need replacement or recycling to maintain production.
Treating fertilizer use as only beneficial, without considering phosphate depletion, leaching, and eutrophication.
Representative question
Discuss the risks and benefits associated with the use of phosphate fertilizers in agriculture.
a. (industrial) agricultural practices require a large quantity of phosphate;
b. phosphate removed by harvesting of agricultural crops;
Benefits:
c. phosphorus added to phosphorus cycle by application of fertilizer;
d. (application of phosphate) increases crop yield;
Risks:
e. availability of phosphate decreasing;
f. lack of phosphate may become limiting factor to agriculture in the future;
g. turnover (rate) in phosphorus cycle is very low/not readily replenished OR consumption faster than production;
h. leaching of nutrients/phosphates from agricultural land into bodies of water;
i. (leaching) causes eutrophication
OR
(leaching) leads to increased biochemical oxygen demand in bodies of water;
Marking guidance:
Accept rivers, lakes, ponds,
etc.
6 max
Eutrophication occurs when leached nitrogen and phosphate fertilizers enrich aquatic or marine water and stimulate excessive primary production.
Nitrate/phosphate leaching → algal or plant growth → shading and biomass death → decomposer respiration rises → biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) rises → dissolved oxygen falls → hypoxia and organism death.
After fertilizer runoff causes a bloom, bacteria decomposing dead algae consume oxygen; fish may die when oxygen demand exceeds reaeration and photosynthetic supply.
BOD measures oxygen demanded by biological decomposition; it is not the same as dissolved oxygen, and a high BOD predicts stronger oxygen depletion.
This objective is assessed through essay response, commonly using Explain / Discuss.
Explain / Discuss
Build the answer around this relationship: Nitrate and phosphate enrichment commonly starts eutrophication in aquatic ecosystems.
Saying algae directly use up all oxygen, instead of linking oxygen loss mainly to aerobic decomposition of dead organic matter.
Representative question
Discuss the causes and consequences of eutrophication.
causes:
a. excess nutrients/nitrates/phosphates in an aquatic system
b. natural runoff from soil/erosion/weathering of rocks
c. runoff of fertilizers «from agricultural land/golf courses»
d. partially treated sewage/animal waste discharged into waterways consequences: [4 max]
e. algal blooms
f. blocks light for photosynthetic organisms
g. dead organisms sink to bottom of water and decompose
h. decomposers/microorganisms increase BOD/use oxygen
i. oxygen/DO availability for other organisms decreases
j. decrease in biodiversity/disappearance of organisms
OWTTE
6 max
Biomagnification is increasing tissue concentration of a persistent pollutant in consumers at successively higher trophic levels.
DDT and mercury are retained or eliminated slowly. Predators consume many contaminated prey, so their total intake produces a higher tissue concentration than in organisms below them.
Mercury can be low in water or plankton, higher in fish and highest in fish-eating birds or mammals; DDT similarly reached damaging concentrations in top predators.
Bioaccumulation is increase within one organism over time; biomagnification is increase between trophic levels. Not every pollutant does either.
This objective is assessed through essay response, commonly using Explain / Define / State.
Explain / Define / State / Discuss / Identify / Suggest / Deduce / Outline / Justify
Build the answer around this relationship: Biomagnification requires a pollutant that persists and accumulates in organism tissues.
Describing biomagnification as any pollution effect, without explaining increasing concentration at successive trophic levels.
Representative question
Discuss the use of DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) in the control of the malarial parasite.
a. (several species of) mosquitoes/Anopheles are vectors of/transmit malarial parasite/Plasmodium;
b. DDT is an insecticide used to kill mosquitoes;
c. DDT sprayed on water where mosquito larvae live / where mosquitoes breed OR
DDT sprayed on walls and ceilings to repel mosquitoes;
d. DDT use very effective in decreasing deaths from malaria
OR
malaria became less common where DDT was used /OWTTE;
e. DDT (persists in environment so) is positive for control of malaria;
f. DDT is fat soluble
OR
DDT accumulates in fatty tissues;
g. DDT is biomagnified
OR
DDT increases up the food chain / in top carnivores;
h. birds of prey (accept name such as osprey) have thinner eggs so they become frail can break easily
OR
failure of birds of prey to reproduce
OR
kill/harm beneficial species/pollinators;
i. DDT persists in environment (so is negative for environmental concerns);
6 max
Ocean plastics persist because they are non-biodegradable; large macroplastics and small microplastics expose organisms in different ways.
| Plastic scale | Example effects on marine life |
|---|---|
| Macroplastic | Entanglement, drowning, injury or blockage after ingestion |
| Microplastic | Ingestion by small organisms, transfer through food webs and exposure to associated chemicals |
Weathering fragments plastic but does not mineralize it, while rivers, wind, fishing and currents continually redistribute material.
Clear scientific communication and popular-media coverage changed public perception and helped drive measures to reduce plastic pollution.
Detection alone does not quantify biological effect; particle size, polymer, dose and exposure duration must be evaluated.
This objective is assessed through essay response, commonly using State / Outline / Suggest.
State / Outline / Suggest / Explain / Describe
Build the answer around this relationship: Macroplastics can kill organisms through entanglement, choking, gut blockage, and starvation.
Treating plastic pollution only as litter, without explaining ingestion, entanglement, or digestive blockage.
Representative question
Explain the consequences of plastic pollution in marine environments.
a. animals may get entangled in plastic and cannot breathe/swim;
b. macroplastics/plastics can be ingested as food
OR
used to feed chicks;
c. which may block their gut/cause death;
d. macroplastics broken down to microplastics
OR
(micro)plastics may release toxic chemicals;
e. DDT/pesticides/heavy metals;
f. microplastics/toxic chemicals may accumulate in tissues/bioaccumulate;
g. microplastics/toxic chemicals build up along food chain/in higher trophic levels/biomagnification;
h. plastics persist for a long time in the environment;
4 max
Rewilding restores self-sustaining ecosystem processes by reconnecting habitats, reintroducing apex predators or other keystone species, and minimizing human impact through ecological management.
Large connected areas allow movement and gene flow; keystone interactions can restore food-web regulation; reducing intensive intervention lets succession and natural disturbance rebuild habitat complexity.
At Hinewai Reserve in New Zealand, management supports natural regeneration of native forest, removes alien trees and vines, and otherwise uses minimal intervention so endemic flora and fauna can re-establish.
Rewilding is not simply abandoning land. Connectivity, invasive-species control, community effects and monitoring determine whether natural processes can recover safely.
This objective is assessed through structured response, commonly using Outline.
Outline
Build the answer around this relationship: Rewilding often uses keystone or native species to restart ecological interactions.
Representative question
Outline two methods of restoration of natural processes in ecosystems by rewilding, other than reintroducing a keystone species.
1.
2.
a. reintroduction of top/apex predators/native species/original forms
OR
retrobreeding/ artificial breeding/selection to restore wildtype
OR
remove invasive species;
b. restore habitats/rehabilitate degraded habitats/re-establishment of connectivity of habitats over large areas (where natural ecosystems have become fragmented)/land protection/ reforesting;
c. minimize human impact / regulate/limit/reduce/eliminate human activity in the ecosystem / creation of national parks/game/natural reserve;
d. allow natural processes of regeneration and recovery;
b. Do not accept "afforestation"
2
Marking guidance:
max
Core D4.2 is secure when students can judge whether a system is being stabilized or pushed toward change. The route is: identify the stability support or disturbance, explain the mechanism, and state the ecosystem consequence using evidence.
Core transfer questions ask students to explain why an ecosystem remains stable or why a disturbance pushes it toward change. Strong answers do not list threats; they explain mechanisms such as lost rainfall recycling, trophic cascade, overharvest, nutrient enrichment, toxin biomagnification, plastic movement, or restoration through rewilding.