B4.2 Ecological niches
Ecological niches connect species roles, nutrition modes, adaptations and competition to how organisms use resources and interact within communities over time.
- Syllabus
- First assessment 2025
- Topic
- B4.2
- Level
- HL
Ecological niches connect species roles, nutrition modes, adaptations and competition to how organisms use resources and interact within communities over time.
A species' niche is its role in a community: the conditions it tolerates, resources it uses, times and places it is active, and interactions that affect survival and reproduction.

Their habitat overlaps, but diet, feeding position and nesting behaviour separate their niches and reduce competition.
Oxygen availability changes which respiration pathways can operate and whether reactive oxygen compounds can be tolerated. That physiology predicts position along an oxygen gradient.
| Organism type | Response to oxygen | Example and likely niche |
|---|---|---|
| obligate aerobe | requires O₂ for respiration | Mycobacterium tuberculosis in oxygenated tissue |
| obligate anaerobe | oxygen is toxic; only anaerobic metabolism | methanogens in anoxic sediments or guts |
| facultative anaerobe | uses aerobic respiration when O₂ is present, switches without it | E. coli across oxygen-rich and oxygen-poor sites |
“Anaerobe” does not always mean oxygen is poisonous: that is true of an obligate anaerobe, whereas a facultative anaerobe can grow on either side of the oxygen boundary.
A nutritional mode specifies the source of carbon and energy and how usable molecules enter cells. The same habitat can contain species with very different routes.
| Mode | Carbon / food source | Decisive process |
|---|---|---|
| photoautotrophic | inorganic CO₂ | light energy drives carbon fixation |
| holozoic | ingested organic matter | internal digestion, then absorption |
| saprotrophic | dead organic matter | external digestion, then absorption |
| mixotrophic | inorganic and organic carbon | combines or switches routes |
Do not classify by energy alone: light is an energy source, while carbon dioxide or organic food supplies the carbon atoms used to build biomass.
Photosynthetic pigments absorb light. The captured energy produces ATP and reducing power, which drive the reduction of carbon dioxide into organic molecules.
light energy → chemical energy
inorganic CO₂ → organic carbon compounds
organic compounds → biomass and respiratory substrate
Plants and algae are eukaryotic photoautotrophs; cyanobacteria are prokaryotic photoautotrophs whose oxygen-releasing photosynthesis helped change Earth's atmosphere. Light supplies energy—not carbon or newly created energy.
| Holozoic consumer | Saprotroph | |
|---|---|---|
| starts with | ingested living or recently killed matter | dead matter or waste outside the organism |
| digestion | internal | enzymes secreted onto the material |
| uptake | soluble products absorbed from gut | soluble products absorbed across surface |
| examples | herbivores, carnivores, omnivores | many fungi and bacteria |
Saprotrophs release inorganic nutrients that producers can reuse, but energy is not recycled: decomposers respire organic molecules and energy ultimately leaves the ecosystem as heat.
A detritivore ingests dead material and digests it internally, so it is holozoic rather than saprotrophic. Egestion removes undigested food; excretion removes metabolic waste.
A mixotroph combines autotrophic and heterotrophic nutrition. The two contributions need not be equal or simultaneous; conditions can shift which route dominates.

In light, Euglena can photosynthesize in chloroplasts. It can also take in bacteria by phagocytosis and digest them in food vacuoles. Facultative mixotrophs shift route as light, prey or nutrients change; obligate mixotrophs require both contributions.
Archaea form one domain, but different species occupy different metabolic niches. Domain membership does not imply one habitat, carbon source or energy pathway.
| Route | Energy mechanism | Carbon source / example |
|---|---|---|
| light-driven pumping | retinal protein pumps ions; gradient drives ATP synthase | often organic carbon; halobacteria, without oxygenic photosynthesis |
| chemoautotrophy | oxidation of inorganic substances supplies energy | CO₂ fixed into organic matter; hydrogen-dependent archaea |
| heterotrophy | organic molecules are oxidized | organic carbon; some marine archaea degrade lignin |
Methanogens occupy anoxic niches and use electron donors such as hydrogen while producing methane. Their metabolism shows why not all chemical energy entering food webs originally comes from sunlight.
For any organism, ask:
photoautotroph ≠ organism that creates energy
holozoic consumer ≠ every heterotroph
detritivore ≠ saprotroph
mixotroph ≠ half-autotroph at all times
archaeon ≠ one fixed metabolism
| Tooth | Shape and main mechanical job |
|---|---|
| incisor | sharp edge slices or bites off pieces |
| canine | pointed crown grips and tears |
| premolar | broader surface crushes and begins grinding |
| molar | large surface grinds food repeatedly |
Dietary inference uses more than one tooth: relative tooth area, cusp shape, enamel wear, jaw robustness and muscle-attachment sites reveal the forces and movements emphasized during feeding.
Form supports a probable processing strategy, not a complete menu. Tools, cooking, ancestry and convergent evolution can weaken a simple tooth-to-diet rule.
| Evidence pattern | Supported inference |
|---|---|
| gorilla: large post-canine teeth, robust jaw, large chewing muscles and sagittal crest | repeated forceful processing of tough vegetation |
| Paranthropus robustus: megadont cheek teeth, thick enamel and robust mandible | high chewing loads from tough or abrasive foods |
| human: smaller canines and molars, gracile jaw, rounded molar cusps | generalized omnivorous processing with less emphasis on forceful grinding |
Make the inference from the combined pattern, then state its limit. Tooth wear and muscle attachment strengthen a claim; one isolated feature cannot prove exactly which foods were eaten.
| Herbivore route to food | Plant defence | Possible counter-adaptation |
|---|---|---|
| chewing mouthparts remove tissue | thorns, spines or stinging hairs raise handling cost | selective feeding or protected mouthparts |
| aphid stylet reaches phloem sap | tougher tissues or defensive chemistry | pectinase helps the stylet pass between cell walls |
| microbial cellulose digestion | low digestibility and toxic compounds | symbiotic microbes or detoxifying enzymes |
A defence lowers feeding success or raises its cost; it rarely makes a plant invulnerable. If heritable counter-adaptations improve feeding, selection can favour them in the herbivore population, which in turn changes selection on the plant.
Nettle hairs deliver irritants, oleander contains cardiac glycosides and cassava releases cyanide precursors unless processed. Always link the named chemical or structure to how it changes herbivore survival or feeding.
| Interaction stage | Predator advantage | Prey resistance |
|---|---|---|
| detect | acute vision, smell, heat sensing or echolocation | camouflage, stillness or hiding |
| approach | stealth or coordinated movement | vigilance and wide field of view |
| capture | speed, grasping limbs, claws or venom | escape, grouping or erratic movement |
| handle | strong jaws or digestive tolerance | armour, spines, toxins or chemical spray |
Forward-facing eyes increase binocular overlap for depth estimation; side-facing eyes broaden surveillance. Neither arrangement alone labels every species as predator or prey—the mechanism must be interpreted with behaviour and ecology.
Adaptations often work together: rolling into a ball is useful because a tough exterior then faces the predator, and a stealth predator benefits from both still behaviour and camouflage.
| Pattern | Information available to predator | Result |
|---|---|---|
| camouflage | prey matches background | detection becomes less likely |
| aposematic colour | conspicuous pattern is associated with toxicity or defence | experienced predators avoid attack |
| Batesian mimicry | harmless species resembles a defended model | predator may avoid the mimic |
Mimicry works only if predators encounter and avoid the defended model often enough. Conspicuous colour is therefore not automatically poor camouflage; its function depends on the receiver's learned or evolved response.
A forest canopy intercepts most incoming light, creating a steep vertical gradient. Plant form determines how a species reaches light and which costs it accepts.

A strangler fig can surround and eventually kill its host, while an ordinary epiphyte uses support without necessarily harming it. Position changes access to light, but also water, minerals and pollinators.
The fundamental niche is the range of conditions and resources a species could use from its adaptations and tolerance limits. The realized niche is the range it actually occupies after competition, predation, mutualism and dispersal act.

Observe the focal species with the competitor present → remove the competitor while keeping abiotic conditions comparable → observe expansion into previously unoccupied space → infer that competition had narrowed the realized niche.
A realized niche is often narrower than the fundamental niche, but beneficial interactions can also make occupancy possible. Absence alone does not reveal which interaction or dispersal barrier is responsible.
Competitive exclusion predicts that two species cannot coexist indefinitely under stable conditions if they occupy effectively identical niches and depend on the same limiting resource.
In Gause's cultures, Paramecium aurelia and P. caudatum both grew when cultured separately. In mixed culture, P. aurelia increased while P. caudatum declined to exclusion. The difference between separate and mixed cultures identifies interspecific competition.
| Ecological situation | Expected outcome |
|---|---|
| strong overlap for one limiting resource | one population declines or is locally excluded |
| partitioning by food, space or time | overlap falls and coexistence becomes possible |
| changing conditions | competitive advantage may alternate |
The principle is conditional, not a claim that competitors never coexist. Field communities can retain competition when niches overlap only partly or environments vary.
A niche connects abiotic tolerance + resource acquisition + activity and form + interactions. These dimensions explain how a species survives and reproduces, not merely where it is found.
potential conditions and resources → fundamental niche
competition, predation, mutualism and dispersal → realized niche
strong overlap for a limiting resource → competition
partitioning by food, space or time → reduced overlap and possible coexistence
To explain an adaptation, name the challenge, the feature or behaviour, its physical or physiological effect, and the consequence for survival or reproduction within that niche.
3 marks
Explain the niche concept.
1 mark
Seaweeds are obligate aerobes. Describe an environmental condition required for seaweed survival.
3 marks
There is evidence that prokaryotes were responsible for changes in the atmospheric gases 3.5 billion years ago. Outline the role of bacteria in producing an oxygen-rich atmosphere.
1 mark
Outline the method of nutrition carried out by P. caudatum.
1 mark
Outline the reason that some species of protists are classified as mixotrophs.
1 mark
Which organism can best be described as a saprotroph?
3 marks
Using the table, distinguish between chemoautotrophs, photoheterotrophs and chemoheterotrophs.
| Energy sources | Carbon sources | |
|---|---|---|
| chemoautotrophs | ____________ | ____________ |
| ____ | ____ | |
| photoheterotrophs | ____ | ____ |
| ____ | ____ | |
| chemoheterotrophs | ____ | ____ |
| ____ |
4 marks
Outline adaptations of animals to herbivory and ways in which plants are adapted to resist herbivores.
2 marks
The graph shows that distasteful butterflies tend to have a lower ability to escape from predators than palatable butterflies. Suggest reasons for this trend.
3 marks
Suggest how this experiment shows that pigeon droppings represent a realized ecological niche for C. neoformans and a fundamental (but not a realized) niche for C. gattii.
1 mark
Paramecium aurelia and Paramecium caudatum are two species of paramecium that grow well individually. Scientists grew these two species of paramecium together, and the result is shown in the graph.
What could be deduced from this data?