A3.2.5 (HL)—Molecular clock
Molecular clocks estimate divergence time from accumulated DNA or amino acid substitutions, assuming calibrated rates of sequence change over lineages.
- Syllabus
- First assessment 2025
- Objective
- A3.2.5
- Level
- HL
Molecular clocks estimate divergence time from accumulated DNA or amino acid substitutions, assuming calibrated rates of sequence change over lineages.

Coverage 2023–2023 · Updated 15 Jul 2026
A molecular clock estimates when clades diverged by relating differences in homologous DNA or amino-acid sequences to an independently calibrated rate of change.
After two lineages split, sequence differences can accumulate in both. A calibration from fossils or another dated event connects genetic distance to time, allowing an estimated divergence date.
The estimate is uncertain because mutation rates can differ with generation time, population size, selective pressure, gene and lineage. A suitable sequence, evolutionary model, calibration and uncertainty range must all be stated.
If two candidate clades show fewer differences in the same calibrated gene than another pair, the clock model supports a more recent divergence for the first pair, assuming comparable rates.
A molecular clock gives an estimate, not a direct timestamp. Genetic distance cannot be converted to time reliably without calibration and rate assumptions.
This objective is assessed through structured response, commonly using Outline / State.
Outline / State
Build the answer around this relationship: Sequence differences can be counted to estimate time since divergence.
Saying only that the relationship is linear without stating that substitutions increase with divergence time.
Representative question
State the relationship between divergence time and number of substitutions.
direct relationship
OR positive correlation
OR
the greater the divergence time, the greater the substitutions;
Marking guidance:
Do not accept "linear relationship" on
its own.
1
max
A3.2 exam answers are strongest when they sound like evidence arguments. Classification organizes diversity, but fixed ranks and morphology can mislead. Evolutionary classification should match phylogeny using monophyletic clades supported by synapomorphies. Molecular clocks estimate divergence time from calibrated sequence differences. Cladograms are built from aligned sequence data and interpreted by nodes, not tip positions. Cladistics can reclassify old taxa, and rRNA evidence supports the three-domain system.