Q BankQuestion BankDocsDocuments

A3.2.8 (HL)—Testing classification correspondence

Cladistics tests whether traditional taxa match evolutionary relationships, revealing when similar morphology results from convergence rather than shared ancestry alone.

Syllabus
First assessment 2025
Objective
A3.2.8
Level
HL

Exam analysis

Chance of appearing1%of analysed past papers
Latest appearanceMay 2018
Most common paperPaper1
Typical marks1

Recent exam appearances

May 2018Paper1 ["HL"] · TZ227[ 1 ]A3.2.8 (HL)—Testing classification correspondence
Practice this objective

Coverage 2018–2018 · Updated 15 Jul 2026

Test a Classification against Independent Evidence

HL only

A classification is stronger when morphology, molecular sequences, fossils and geography support the same branching pattern.

Researchers compare competing trees, identify conflicts and ask whether differences reflect sampling, convergent traits, gene transfer or different evolutionary histories. Agreement increases confidence but does not remove uncertainty.

Test correspondence by:

  • choosing homologous characters
  • comparing independent datasets
  • checking sampling and outgroups
  • reporting conflicting signals

If a morphology tree and several gene trees place two taxa together, the relationship is better supported than if only one superficial trait does.

One matching feature cannot override a broad, well-sampled conflict without explaining why.

Testing classification correspondence

HL only

Assessment in practice

1 marks
How it is assessed

This objective is assessed through multiple choice.

What earns marks

Build the answer around this relationship: Cladistics can test whether traditional taxa reflect evolutionary ancestry.

Representative question

Question 1

[Maximum number: 1]

The figwort family is a large one consisting of many flowering plants that look similar. For what reason have some members of the family been reclassified into a new family?

A

Cladistic analysis shows the differences in flower structure to be fewer than the shared similarities.

B

DNA analysis shows the similarities in flower shape to be a product of convergent evolution.

C

DNA analysis shows some of the families to have suffered recent mutations in only one gene.

D

DNA analysis shows the similarities between the seed dispersal strategies to be a product of divergent evolution.

Read And Defend A Cladogram

HL only

A3.2 exam answers are strongest when they sound like evidence arguments. Classification organizes diversity, but fixed ranks and morphology can mislead. Evolutionary classification should match phylogeny using monophyletic clades supported by synapomorphies. Molecular clocks estimate divergence time from calibrated sequence differences. Cladograms are built from aligned sequence data and interpreted by nodes, not tip positions. Cladistics can reclassify old taxa, and rRNA evidence supports the three-domain system.

  • Classification should reveal relationships, not just names.
  • Fixed ranks and convergence can mislead.
  • Monophyletic clades include an ancestor and all descendants and are supported by synapomorphies.
  • Molecular clocks need calibration and can vary in rate.
  • Cladograms are built from aligned sequences using computer analysis and parsimony.
  • Read relatedness from most recent common ancestors, not tip positions.
  • Figwort and three-domain examples show molecular evidence changing classification.

Concept essentials

  • Cladistics can test whether traditional taxa reflect evolutionary ancestry.
  • Similar morphology can result from convergent evolution.
  • DNA evidence can reveal that a family is not a natural group.
  • The figwort-family reclassification shows taxonomy changing with new evidence.
ConceptIB Biology HL