A3.2.6 (HL)—Constructing cladograms

Cladograms are constructed by comparing traits or aligned sequences, then choosing trees that best explain shared similarities and differences parsimoniously.

Syllabus
First assessment 2025
Objective
A3.2.6
Level
HL

Exam analysis

Chance of appearing7%of analysed past papers
Latest appearanceMay 2025
Most common paperPaper2
Typical marks1–3

Common command terms

  • Explain
  • State
  • Describe
  • Discuss
  • Outline

Scoring notes

Common mistake
Choosing a cladogram from visual layout rather than shared trait or sequence evidence.

Recent exam appearances

May 2025Paper2 ["HL"] · TZ37(d)[ 1 ]A3.2.6 (HL)—Constructing cladograms
May 2025Paper2 ["HL"] · TZ37(b)[ 3 ]A3.2.6 (HL)—Constructing cladograms
May 2023Paper2 ["HL"] · TZ28(c)[ 7 ]A3.2.6 (HL)—Constructing cladograms
May 2022Paper1 ["HL"] · TZ119[ 1 ]A3.2.6 (HL)—Constructing cladograms
May 2019Paper2 ["HL"] · TZ24(b)[ 3 ]A3.2.6 (HL)—Constructing cladograms
Practice this objective

Coverage 2015–2025 · Updated 15 Jul 2026

Construct a Parsimonious Cladogram from Sequences

HL only

A sequence-based cladogram is a hypothesis that groups taxa according to shared differences in aligned DNA, RNA or amino-acid sequences.

Homologous sequences are aligned so each position can be compared. Candidate trees place the observed changes on branches, and parsimony selects the tree that explains the data with the smallest total number of sequence changes.

Procedure: align homologous sequences; record variable positions; use an outgroup where provided to infer ancestral states; propose alternative branching patterns; count the minimum changes required by each; select the most parsimonious supported tree.

If taxa B and C share two sequence states absent from A and the outgroup, a tree pairing B with C may require fewer independent changes than trees pairing either taxon with A.

Parsimony identifies the simplest explanation for the supplied data, not a guaranteed true history. Different genes or criteria can support a different hypothesis.

Constructing cladograms

HL only

Assessment in practice

1–3 marks
How it is assessed

This objective is assessed through essay response, structured response, commonly using Explain / State / Describe.

Command terms

Explain / State / Describe / Discuss / Outline

What earns marks

Build the answer around this relationship: Cladograms can be built from traits, DNA sequences, RNA sequences, or protein sequences.

Watch for

Choosing a cladogram from visual layout rather than shared trait or sequence evidence.

Representative question

Question 1

[Maximum number: 3]

Discuss the use of amino acid sequences of proteins as the basis for constructing cladograms.

Read And Defend A Cladogram

HL only

A3.2 exam answers are strongest when they sound like evidence arguments. Classification organizes diversity, but fixed ranks and morphology can mislead. Evolutionary classification should match phylogeny using monophyletic clades supported by synapomorphies. Molecular clocks estimate divergence time from calibrated sequence differences. Cladograms are built from aligned sequence data and interpreted by nodes, not tip positions. Cladistics can reclassify old taxa, and rRNA evidence supports the three-domain system.

  • Classification should reveal relationships, not just names.
  • Fixed ranks and convergence can mislead.
  • Monophyletic clades include an ancestor and all descendants and are supported by synapomorphies.
  • Molecular clocks need calibration and can vary in rate.
  • Cladograms are built from aligned sequences using computer analysis and parsimony.
  • Read relatedness from most recent common ancestors, not tip positions.
  • Figwort and three-domain examples show molecular evidence changing classification.

Concept essentials

  • Cladograms can be built from traits, DNA sequences, RNA sequences, or protein sequences.
  • Sequence alignment allows comparable bases or amino acids to be compared.
  • More similar sequences usually indicate closer evolutionary relationship.
  • Parsimony favours the tree requiring the fewest evolutionary changes.
  • Molecular cladistics can reclassify groups that morphology placed incorrectly.