19.2 Food chains and food webs
- Syllabus
- 0610–2026–2027
- Topic
- 19.2
- Level
- —
A food chain shows the transfer of energy from one organism to the next and begins with a producer.
Each arrow points from the organism being eaten to the organism that feeds on it: it shows the direction of energy transfer.
An arrow does not point towards the food. In grass → rabbit, energy moves from grass to rabbit.
To predict a population change, follow both directions: fewer prey can reduce its predator, while fewer predators can allow its prey to increase; then trace further effects along the chain.
A prediction needs a feeding link and a direction. Do not assume every population changes in the same direction.
A food web is a network of interconnected food chains. One organism may have several food sources or predators and may feed at more than one trophic level.
For any question, first trace arrows into the named consumer to find its food, then arrows leaving its prey or entering its predators. Predict direct effects before indirect ones and state the feeding reason.
A food web does not prove that every possible effect will occur. Use only the drawn feeding relationships and qualify indirect predictions when alternatives remain.
A producer is an organism that makes its own organic nutrients, usually using energy from sunlight through photosynthesis.
Producers convert light energy into chemical energy stored in organic molecules and form the first trophic level of most food chains.
A producer is not merely an organism that provides food; it makes organic nutrients rather than obtaining them by feeding.
A consumer is an organism that gets its energy by feeding on other organisms.
A consumer's classification depends on what it eats and its position in a particular food chain or route through a food web.
Consumer does not mean only carnivore: herbivores and animals at higher feeding positions are consumers.
A primary consumer feeds on a producer; a secondary consumer feeds on a primary consumer; a tertiary consumer feeds on a secondary consumer; a quaternary consumer feeds on a tertiary consumer.
In a food web, trace one complete route from a producer. The same organism can occupy different consumer levels on different routes.
The label is determined by position, not by an organism's name or size. A predator can be secondary on one route and tertiary on another.
A herbivore is an animal that gets its energy by eating plants.
In a chain beginning with a plant producer, the herbivore is normally the primary consumer.
Herbivore describes the animal's food source; it is not another word for producer.
A carnivore is an animal that gets its energy by eating other animals.
A carnivore may be a secondary, tertiary or quaternary consumer, depending on the feeding route.
Carnivore does not identify one fixed trophic level; trace what the animal eats in the stated chain or web.
A decomposer is an organism that gets its energy from dead or waste organic material.
Dead material and waste can come from producers, herbivores or carnivores, so decomposers receive energy from material originating at every trophic level.
A decomposer is defined by obtaining energy from dead or waste organic material, not simply by being small or living in soil.
Overharvesting removes a food species faster than it is replaced. Its predators may lose a food source and decline, while organisms it ate may increase; further effects can spread through alternative links.
An introduced foreign species may become a new predator, prey or competitor. Trace which native population it directly changes, then follow the arrows to predict indirect effects.
Do not state that every introduced species causes the same outcome. A justified prediction must identify the new feeding or competition relationship and its direction.
A pyramid of numbers uses bar width to represent the number of organisms at each trophic level. A pyramid of biomass uses bar width to represent their total biomass, usually per unit area.
| Representation | What each bar measures | Possible shape |
|---|---|---|
| numbers | count of individuals | may be inverted or irregular, for example one tree supporting many insects |
| biomass | total mass of living material | usually decreases at higher trophic levels |
Place the producer at the bottom and higher trophic levels above it. Use a common scale, make bar widths proportional to the data, and label every level.
Bar width represents the stated quantity, not the physical size of one organism.
A biomass pyramid accounts for the mass of organisms, so one large producer is not represented as equivalent to one tiny consumer merely because both count as one individual.
Biomass gives a better indication of how much living material—and therefore potential food—is present at each trophic level than numbers alone.
Biomass is more informative than organism count, but it is still a snapshot and does not directly show energy transferred over time.
A trophic level is the position of an organism in a food chain, food web or ecological pyramid.
Assign it by tracing a feeding route from the producer, which occupies the first trophic level.
An organism can feed at more than one trophic level in a food web if different routes place it in different positions.
Producer = trophic level 1; primary consumer = level 2; secondary consumer = level 3; tertiary consumer = level 4; quaternary consumer = level 5.
Start at a producer and count each energy-transfer arrow along one route. Name a consumer from the organism immediately before it: eating a primary consumer makes it a secondary consumer.
Do not count the Sun as a trophic level, and do not assign a web organism one level without checking every relevant route.
A pyramid of energy represents the energy available at each trophic level over a stated area and time. The producer bar forms the base and each higher bar is narrower.
Order trophic levels from producer upward, use one scale for proportional bar widths, include energy units with area and time when supplied, and read transfer as the difference or ratio between adjacent levels.
A pyramid of energy is always upright because less energy is available at each successive trophic level.
A pyramid of energy shows actual energy transfer and includes a time interval, so it accounts for organisms with different sizes, life spans, reproduction rates and turnover.
| Pyramid | Main limitation avoided by energy data |
|---|---|
| numbers | treats every individual as one regardless of size |
| biomass | gives a standing mass at one time and may miss rapid replacement |
| energy | measures flow per area per time and is always upright |
Energy pyramids need more measurement, but they give the most direct representation of transfer efficiency.
Transfer is inefficient because not all parts are eaten; some eaten material is not digested or absorbed and leaves as faeces; energy is used in respiration, movement and other life processes and is transferred to the environment as heat; waste products also carry energy away.
Efficiency of transfer (%) = energy transferred to the next trophic level ÷ energy available at the previous trophic level × 100.
Less energy is available at each higher level, so higher trophic levels usually support less biomass and fewer organisms.
Energy is transferred, not destroyed; energy unavailable to the next consumer has moved to waste, decomposers or the environment.
Because energy transfer at every trophic step is inefficient, successive losses leave progressively less energy available to support biomass at the next level.
After several transfers, too little energy remains to support another stable consumer population. Food chains therefore usually have fewer than five trophic levels.
Food chains are not short because predators choose to stop feeding; accumulated energy loss limits the biomass that another level could support.
Humans eating crop plants feed at a lower trophic level than humans eating livestock that first ate those crops.
The livestock uses crop energy in respiration, movement and other processes, and loses energy in waste and uneaten or indigestible material. Eating the crop directly avoids this additional inefficient transfer.
For the same crop energy input, a larger proportion can reach humans through crop → human than through crop → livestock → human.
The claim is specifically about energy-transfer efficiency, not a statement that every crop or diet has the same yield, nutrition or environmental impact.