Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, discuss the need for a balance between market-oriented policies and government intervention to promote economic development in Cameroon.
Level 0 (0 marks): - The work does not meet a standard described by the descriptors below.
Level 1 (1-3 marks): - The response indicates little understanding of the specific demands of the question. - Economic theory is stated but it is not relevant. - Economic terms are stated but they are not relevant. - The response contains no evidence of synthesis or evaluation. - The response contains no use of text/data. Level 2 (4-6 marks): - The response indicates some understanding of the specific demands of the question. - Relevant economic theory is described. - Some relevant economic terms are included. - The response contains evidence of superficial synthesis or evaluation. - The response contains limited use of text/data. Level 3 (7-9 marks): - The response indicates understanding of the specific demands of the question, but these demands are only partially addressed. - Relevant economic theory is partly explained. - Some relevant economic terms are used appropriately. - Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included. - The response contains evidence of appropriate synthesis or evaluation but lacks balance. - The response includes some relevant information from the text/data. Level 4 (10-12 marks): - The specific demands of the question are understood and addressed. - Relevant economic theory is explained. - Relevant economic terms are used appropriately. - Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included and explained. - The response contains evidence of appropriate synthesis or evaluation that is mostly balanced. - The use of information from the text/data is generally appropriate, relevant, and applied correctly. Level 5 (13-15 marks): - The specific demands of the question are understood and addressed. - Relevant economic theory is fully explained. - Relevant economic terms are used appropriately throughout the response. - Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included and fully explained. - The response contains evidence of effective and balanced synthesis or evaluation. - The use of information from the text/data is appropriate, relevant, and is used to formulate a reasoned argument supported by analysis/evaluation. Command term
"Discuss" requires candidates to offer a considered and balanced review that includes a range of arguments, factors, or hypotheses. Opinions or conclusions should be presented clearly and supported by appropriate evidence.
Responses may include:
- a definition of economic development
- a definition of government intervention/interventionist policies
- a definition of market-oriented policies
- diagrams (eg AD/AS, poverty cycle).
Intervention which may lead to development
- Military intervention to bring stability to regions experiencing conflicts (Text D, paragraph 2).
- The high interest rates help maintain the fixed exchange rate which brings stability (Text D, paragraph 6).
- The policies under the Growth and Employment Strategy would help increase human capital and increase productivity, which may help many break the poverty cycle and increase LRAS and export revenues (which could result in higher incomes) (Text E, paragraphs 1, 3 and 4).
- Better infrastructure would bring in FDI/increased investment (Text E, paragraph 1).
- The higher minimum wage helps increase workers' well-being but comes with the possibility of unemployment and may make it difficult for the authorities to reduce the size of the informal sector (Text E, paragraph 3).
- Subsidies help to keep electricity, food and fuel prices low and accessible (Text D, paragraph 4; Text E, paragraph 4).
Limitations of intervention
- Fiscal deficits and government debt may increase (Text D, paragraphs 2 and 3).
- Some forms of intervention are too short-term such as subsidies (Text D, paragraph 4) or may not be sustainable in the long-term (Text D, paragraph 2).
- There is an opportunity cost to intervention (Text D, paragraph 4).
- Subsidies for fuel can increase external costs (Text D, paragraph 4).
- Intervention through higher interest rates to support the overvalued currency (Text D, paragraph 6) will have a contractionary impact on the economy and this could limit the impact of expansionary fiscal policy (Text D, paragraph 3).
- High interest rates also mean that entrepreneurs have more difficulty in obtaining loans (Table 3).
- The fixed (over-valued) exchange rate raises export prices, which hampers trade (but does contribute to lower prices of fertilizers etc) (Text D, paragraph 6).
- Military intervention may reduce freedoms and development (Text D, paragraph 2).
Market-oriented policies which may lead to development
- Deregulation/decrease in bureaucracy may lead to an increase in investment (Text D, paragraph 5). This may help promote local entrepreneurship.
- Membership in free trade groups allows for higher export revenue which would lead to economic growth. The EU and UK currently account for almost half of trade with Cameroon (Table 3).
- The removal of tariffs on fertilizers (Text F) would help decrease farmers' costs and lead to more competitive exports (Text E, paragraph 2). This could also help decrease the need for subsidies in the long-term (Text E, paragraph 3).
- Removal of tariffs on capital goods (Text F) may lead to higher productivity and/or reduce costs for firms.
Limitations of market-oriented policies
- Membership of free trade groups may worsen/not reduce Cameroon's persistent trade deficit if imports increase more than exports (Text D, paragraph 6).
- Without adequate provision of infrastructure and provision of education, the country will continue to lack diversification of economic activities. Economic growth may not be sustained due to the volatility of commodity prices (Text D, paragraph 2).
- Some policies such as tax incentives and subsidies may not benefit those working in the informal sector. Such policies would thus have limited effectiveness in reducing poverty due to the size of the informal economy (Text D, paragraph 3) and level of poverty (Text D, paragraph 4).
- Relative poverty may continue to increase due to disparities in benefits from export-led growth (Text D, paragraph 4).
Examiners should be aware that candidates may take a different approach which, if appropriate, should be rewarded.