Level
Marks
0
- The work does not meet a standard described by the descriptors below.
1
- The response indicates little understanding of the specific demands of the question.
- Economic theory is stated but it is not relevant.
- Economic terms are stated but they are not relevant.
- The response contains no evidence of synthesis or evaluation.
- The response contains no use of text/data.
1-3
2
- The response indicates some understanding of the specific demands of the question.
- Relevant economic theory is described.
- Some relevant economic terms are included.
- The response contains evidence of superficial synthesis or evaluation.
- The response contains limited use of text/data.
4-6
3
- The response indicates understanding of the specific demands of the question, but these demands are only partially addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is partly explained.
- Some relevant economic terms are used appropriately.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included.
- The response contains evidence of appropriate synthesis or evaluation but lacks balance.
- The response includes some relevant information from the text/data.
7-9
4
- The specific demands of the question are understood and addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is explained.
- Relevant economic terms are used appropriately.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included and explained.
- The response contains evidence of appropriate synthesis or evaluation that is mostly balanced.
- The use of information from the text/data is generally appropriate, relevant, and applied correctly.
10-12
5
- The specific demands of the question are understood and addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is fully explained.
- Relevant economic terms are used appropriately throughout the response.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included and fully explained.
- The response contains evidence of effective and balanced synthesis or evaluation.
- The use of information from the text/data is appropriate, relevant, and is used to formulate a reasoned argument supported by analysis/evaluation.
13-15
Command term
"Discuss" requires candidates to offer a considered and balanced review that includes a range of arguments, factors, or hypotheses. Opinions or conclusions should be presented clearly and supported by appropriate evidence.
Responses may include:
- The impact on the unemployment rate may be mixed:
- it could be argued that the inflows of FDI (Text A, paragraph 2;
Table 2) and greater exports to the EU could lead to job creation.
- The lower wages may attract EU firms which may help reduce the high unemployment rate (Text A, paragraph 6;
Table 2).
- Jobs may be lost in the agricultural sector (Text C) which still employs 16\% of the population (Text A, paragraph 5).
- Funds from the EU have helped increase access to education and workers' training which could help reduce the skills mismatch (text B, paragraph 4) and hence reduce the high (structural) unemployment rate (Text A, paragraph 6).
- The impact on economic growth:
- the increase in trade could close the current account (balance of trade) deficit (Table 2, answer to b(ii)), lead to increase in AD and hence actual growth.
- more trade may raise efficiency in North Macedonia through increased competition, economies of scale from larger markets, and improved resource allocation
- it could be argued that trade may not increase significantly since North Macedonia is already enjoying free trade with the EU over most goods and services (Text C).
- as North Macedonia currently suffers a deficit in the balance of trade (Text A, paragraph 4, answer to b(ii)) and a current account deficit (Table 2), the removal of quotas may worsen its balance of trade position and could lead to a fall in AD.
- the various supply-side policies needed to meet the requirements for EU membership have allowed potential growth and kept the inflation rate low (Table 1).
- the net FDI inflow throughout the 4-year period (Table 2) reflects potential growth.
- Access to seaports would be easier since North Macedonia is landlocked (Text A, paragraph 1). This would further attract investment.
- The free movement of labour which comes with the common market may worsen the emigration problem and contribute to a 'brain drain' problem (Text A, paragraph 6).
- The EU is providing North Macedonia with financial assistance to finance supply
side policies, which will allow them to become more globally competitive (Text B, paragraph 1).
- Increased trade with the EU has allowed for diversification (Text B, paragraph 4) and the growth of the manufacturing sector (Text A, paragraph 5).
- Once North Macedonia no longer receives financial assistance from the EU, it may have difficulties financing government expenditure.
- The removal of quotas may have some impact on the local agricultural sector (Text C) which could worsen the incidence of poverty (Text A, paragraph 6) and lead to over-reliance on other countries for food security since North Macedonia is already a net importer of food (Text C).
- As a member of the EU common market, North Macedonia will continue to have unrestricted access to imported capital goods, enhancing productivity and potential growth (Text A, paragraph 4).
- North Macedonia will have to adopt EU external tariffs which may negatively impact its trade position with non-members ( 3 neighbouring countries are not part of the common market - Text A, paragraph 1).
- The repatriation of foreign firms' profits (Text A, paragraph 3) may lead to a worsening of the balance of payments and a shortage of financial capital.
- There could be a loss of sovereignty as North Macedonia will need to give unrestricted access to EU firms which have already invested in essential services (Text A, paragraph 3)
- Compliance with EU standards for environmental protection could lead to less pollution and an improved quality of life (Text B, paragraph 3).
- Greater competition due to exposure to foreign firms may lead to innovation.
Examiners should be aware that candidates may take a different approach which, if appropriate, should be rewarded.