Using information from the texts/data and your knowledge of economics, discuss the impact of economic integration on the Uruguayan economy.
Level 0 (0 marks): - The work does not meet a standard described by the descriptors below.
Level 1 (1-3 marks): - The response indicates little understanding of the specific demands of the question. - Economic theory is stated but it is not relevant. - Economic terms are stated but they are not relevant. - The response contains no evidence of synthesis or evaluation. - The response contains no use of text/data. Level 2 (4-6 marks): - The response indicates some understanding of the specific demands of the question. - Relevant economic theory is described. - Some relevant economic terms are included. - The response contains evidence of superficial synthesis or evaluation. - The response contains limited use of text/data. Level 3 (7-9 marks): - The response indicates understanding of the specific demands of the question, but these demands are only partially addressed. - Relevant economic theory is partly explained. - Some relevant economic terms are used appropriately. - Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included. - The response contains evidence of appropriate synthesis or evaluation but lacks balance. - The response includes some relevant information from the text/data. Level 4 (10-12 marks): - The specific demands of the question are understood and addressed. - Relevant economic theory is explained. - Relevant economic terms are used appropriately. - Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included and explained. - The response contains evidence of appropriate synthesis or evaluation that is mostly balanced. - The use of information from the text/data is generally appropriate, relevant, and applied correctly. Level 5 (13-15 marks): - The specific demands of the question are understood and addressed. - Relevant economic theory is fully explained. - Relevant economic terms are used appropriately throughout the response. - Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included and fully explained. - The response contains evidence of effective and balanced synthesis or evaluation. - The use of information from the text/data is appropriate, relevant, and is used to formulate a reasoned argument supported by analysis/evaluation. Command term
"Discuss" requires candidates to offer a considered and balanced review that includes a range of arguments, factors, or hypotheses. Opinions or conclusions should be presented clearly and supported by appropriate evidence.
Responses may include:
- a definition of economic integration
- a definition of a common market
- a definition of a free-trade agreement
- diagrams (eg AD/AS, tariff, quota).
- The advantages of membership of the MERCOSUR common market and EU
MERCOSUR free trade agreement:
- Greater access to a market of 290 million consumers through the MERCOSUR common market and possibility to access the markets of the 27 members of the EU;
offer potential for economies of scale for Uruguayan producers who would otherwise be limited to the small size of the domestic market (Text A, paragraph 1 and Text B, paragraph 1).
- Increase in export revenue has contributed to economic growth and higher real GNI per capita (Text A, paragraphs 2 and 3, Table 2) and poverty reduction (Text A, paragraph 5;
Table 2). Although the country benefitted significantly from exports to China, which is not a member of either trade bloc (Text A, paragraph 2).
- Membership to the EU-MERCOSUR free trade agreement may lead to greater exports to the EU (Text B, paragraphs 1 and 2 ) and may help restore Uruguay's growth rate (Text A, paragraph 3). This could be contrasted with the negative/low balance of trade (table 1). But quotas, which cause inefficiencies and higher prices, remain for some items (Text B, paragraph 2).
- With freedom of movement of labour within MERCOSUR, there are greater employment opportunities. However, the freedom of movement might have contributed to the unemployment rate (Text A, paragraph 5).
- Uruguay's tariff-free access to MERCOSUR and the EU makes it an attractive destination for foreign investors (Text A, paragraph 6 and Text B, paragraph 4).
- A high common external tariff protects Uruguayan producers from cheap imports from China (Text C, paragraph 1).
- Membership in a trading bloc may allow for stronger bargaining power in multilateral negotiations such as the EU-MERCOSUR free trade agreement.
- Greater political stability and cooperation.
- The disadvantages of membership of the MERCOSUR common market and free trade agreement:
- Uruguay is susceptible to external shocks (Text A, paragraph 3). As Uruguay is over reliant on trade of primary products and is not diversifying its exports (Text A, paragraph 4), this may explain why the Gini index and real GNI per capita have only narrowly improved since the end of the commodity boom (Table 2).
- Increased production of meat, paper and wood for exports represent a threat to sustainability (Text B, paragraphs 1 and 4).
- Lowered protectionist measures may lead to more structural unemployment (Text B, paragraph 3) once tariffs are removed/reduced as part of the EU
MERCOSUR free trade agreement.
- Uruguay has suffered from a loss of sovereignty, which prevents the country from entering bilateral trade agreement(s) and reducing its tariffs (Text C, paragraphs 1 and 2).
- Challenge to multilateral trading negotiations.
Examiners should be aware that candidates may take a different approach which, if appropriate, should be rewarded.