IB Economics SL 4.10.5 Institutional change Question Bank
Practise IB Economics SL/HL 4.10.5 by applying institutional change concepts to exam-style questions.
- Syllabus
- First assessment 2022
- Course
- Economics SL
- Level
- SL
Practise IB Economics SL/HL 4.10.5 by applying institutional change concepts to exam-style questions.
Study the extract below and answer the questions that follow.
Micro-credit conflict of interest
(1) The idea of giving small loans to poor people, especially women, was hailed as the key to achieving economic development for even the poorest citizens. Muhammad Yunus, the economist who pioneered the practice by lending small amounts to basket weavers in Bangladesh, won a Nobel Peace Prize in 2006.
(2) The practice has grown so popular, helping establish small businesses such as tailors and hairdressers, that some are now concerned over the direction it has taken. Attracted by the prospect of profits from even the smallest of loans, some banks now dominate micro-credit, with some charging interest rates of over 100 %.
(3) The key question facing the industry remains how much money investors should make from lending to poor people, mostly women, often at hidden interest rates. "Micro-credit should be seen as an opportunity to help people out of poverty, not as an opportunity to make money out of poor people," Yunus said. "Interest rates should be 10 to 15 % above the cost of raising the money and anything beyond that is exploitation. Most micro-credit lenders would fail this test."
(4) How much interest and profit are acceptable and what constitutes exploitation? The interest rates that draw the most concern include those in Nigeria and Mexico, where the demand for small loans from a large population cannot be met by existing lenders. One Mexican lender charges an annual rate of 125 %. The average in Mexico is about 70 %, compared with a global average of about 37 % in interest and fees.
5 There is debate over whether micro-credit loans actually lift people out of poverty. Some researchers conclude that not every poor person is an entrepreneur in waiting but the loans do help relieve some of the worst aspects of poverty.
(6) The micro-credit industry has outgrown its charitable beginning. Despite a promise to put the money back into development, analysts say the high interest rates and healthy profits of the largest micro-credit institutions pushed up interest rates across Mexico.
Using information from the text/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate micro-finance as a means of promoting economic development.
Responses may include:
Possible advantages:
- allows even those in poverty to borrow funds (paragraph (1))
- has allowed many women to borrow funds (paragraph 1 and (3)
- allows individuals to establish businesses such as tailors and hairdressers (paragraph 2)
- allows more people to be employed
- allows higher incomes
- allows more savings to occur - fills the savings gap and breaks the cycle
- increased incomes allow the purchase of more goods and services and hence improved standards of living
- releases potential entrepreneurship.
Possible disadvantages:
- some lenders are very focused on making profits for themselves (paragraph 2)
- some large firms have moved into the business of micro-finance
- small loans may not assist some to escape poverty as some do not have the necessary entrepreneurial skills (paragraph 5)
- in some cases high rates of interest of up to 125 % (paragraph (4)) are charged
- some loans involve exploitation of borrowers (paragraph (3)
- some of the loan costs are hidden from borrowers
- increasing micro-finance rates has pushed up interest rates across Mexico (paragraph 6)
- micro-finance banks are not putting their profits into development, which is restricting the process of economic development (paragraph 6)
- micro-finance on its own may not be sufficient as a means to promote economic development - other policies will also be needed.
Effective evaluation may be to:
- consider short-term versus long-term consequences
- examine the impact on different stakeholders
- discuss advantages and disadvantages
- prioritize the arguments.
Examiners should be aware that candidates may take a different approach which if appropriate, should be rewarded.
If there is no direct reference to the text/data, then candidates may not be rewarded beyond level 2 .
Level
0 No valid discussion. ..... 0
1 Few relevant concepts recognized. Little discussion or only basic understanding. ..... 1-2
2 Relevant concepts recognized and developed in reasonable depth. Some attempt at application and analysis. ..... 3-5
3 Relevant concepts developed in reasonable depth, demonstrating effective evaluation, supported by appropriate evidence or theory. ..... 6-8