Marks
Level descriptor
0
- The work does not meet a standard described by the descriptors below.
1-3
- The response indicates little understanding of the specific demands of the question.
- Economic theory is stated but it is not relevant.
- Economic terms are stated but they are not relevant or are used incorrectly.
- The response contains no evidence of synthesis or evaluation.
- The response contains no use of text/data or it is merely copied.
4-6
- The response indicates some understanding of the specific demands of the question.
- Relevant economic theory is described.
- Some relevant economic terms are included.
- The response contains evidence of relevant but superficial synthesis or evaluation.
- The response contains limited use of text/data.
7-9
- The response indicates understanding of the specific demands of the question, but these demands are only partially addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is partly explained.
- Some relevant economic terms are used appropriately.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included.
- The response contains evidence of appropriate synthesis or evaluation but lacks balance.
- The response includes some relevant information from the text/data.
10-12
- The specific demands of the question are understood and addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is explained.
- Relevant economic terms are used appropriately.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included and explained.
- The response contains evidence of appropriate synthesis or evaluation that is mostly balanced.
- The use of information from the text/data is generally appropriate, relevant, and applied correctly.
13-15
- The specific demands of the question are thoroughly understood and addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is fully explained.
- Relevant economic terms are used appropriately throughout the response.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included and fully explained.
- The response contains evidence of effective and balanced synthesis or evaluation.
- The use of information from the text/data is appropriate, relevant, and is used to formulate a reasoned argument supported by analysis/evaluation.
\footnotetext{
Command term
"Discuss" requires candidates to offer a considered and balanced review that includes a range of arguments, factors or hypotheses. Opinions or conclusions should be presented clearly and supported by appropriate evidence.
}
Terminology may include:
- growth
- sustainability
- equity
- economic well-being
- development
- externalities
- opportunity costs/choice
- absolute/relative poverty
- nominal/real GDP
Economic models to support analysis may include:
- an externalities diagram
- a labour market diagram
- a PPC diagram
- an AD/AS diagram
- a Lorenz curve diagram
N.B. It should be noted that diagrams that have already been given in answers to parts (b), (c), (d), (e) or (f), and then referred to in part (g), should be rewarded.
Candidates are not expected to cover every possible consequence of growth in order to achieve high marks.
Responses may include:
Variable
impacted
Benefits of growth
Costs of growth/sectors not benefiting
Living
standards
Rising because both per capita real
GDP and HDI rising (Text A, paragraph 1;
Table 2) and absolute poverty falling which can ameliorate the poverty cycle (Text B, paragraph
1).
Rural poverty continues (Text B, paragraph 1).
Structure of
GDP
The economy is diversifying with
increases in manufacturing, tourism, etc (Text A, paragraph 1).
But increases in manufacturing etc
may mean that agricultural output is neglected, leading to food prices rising, food insecurity, and continuing
low productivity (Text A, paragraphs 2 & 3;
Text B, paragraph 1).
Inflation
Economy is growing without hyperinflation (Table 2).
High growth could be causing demand- pull inflation, though the main cause seems to be cost-push (Text A, paragraph 3). However, the
depreciation (to promote exports) is probably adding to inflation (Text A, paragraph 5).
Distribution of
income
Gini coefficient decreasing and therefore less inequality (Text B, paragraph 1;
Table 3).
Could be causing more inequality between sectors, because some benefit
more from growth (e.g. tourism, urban areas) (Text B, paragraph 1).
Employment
Employment opportunities increasing for certain sectors (Text A, paragraph 1).
Youth unemployment continues and a
lot of employment is in the informal sector (which has not fallen). Possibly
causing structural unemployment (Text
A, paragraph 1;
Text B, paragraph 1, Table 3).
Government
budget
Higher tax revenues and therefore a
lower budget deficit (Text A, paragraph 4).
Government
spending
More government spending possible on transfer payments or
infrastructure or education or the Hustler fund, which could eventually
improve human capital (raising potential GDP) and the distribution of
income (Text A, paragraph 4;
Text
B, paragraph 2).
International trade/
financial
flows
Growth of secondary and tertiary sectors means that export revenues are more predictable than when
most exports are primary goods
(Text A, paragraph 5).
Growth may eventually lead to less foreign aid and support (e.g. from World
Bank) if Kenya becomes a high-income
country (Text A, paragraph 4;
Text C, paragraph 4).
The
environment
Growth which is based on climate- related projects will improve the environment (Text C, paragraphs 2
& 4)
Kenya is taking measures to reduce environmental problems and perhaps can afford to do so (with public-private partnerships) because
it is growing (Text C, paragraph 1 &
2).
Growth leads to more carbon emissions and deforestation, etc. (Text C, paragraph 1)
Growth leads to more urbanization and more need for transport, which can have negative externalities (Text C, paragraph 3).
Examiners should be aware that candidates may take a different approach which, if appropriate, should be rewarded.