Marks
Level descriptor
0
- The work does not meet a standard described by the descriptors below.
1-3
- The response indicates little understanding of the specific demands of the question.
- Economic theory is stated but it is not relevant.
- Economic terms are stated but they are not relevant or are used incorrectly.
- The response contains no evidence of synthesis or evaluation.
- The response contains no use of text/data or it is merely copied.
4-6
- The response indicates some understanding of the specific demands of the question.
- Relevant economic theory is described.
- Some relevant economic terms are included.
- The response contains evidence of relevant but superficial synthesis or evaluation.
- The response contains limited use of text/data.
7-9
- The response indicates understanding of the specific demands of the question, but these demands are only partially addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is partly explained.
- Some relevant economic terms are used appropriately.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included.
- The response contains evidence of appropriate synthesis or evaluation but lacks balance.
- The response includes some relevant information from the text/data.
10-12
- The specific demands of the question are understood and addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is explained.
- Relevant economic terms are used appropriately.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included and explained.
- The response contains evidence of appropriate synthesis or evaluation that is mostly balanced.
- The use of information from the text/data is generally appropriate, relevant, and applied correctly.
13-15
- The specific demands of the question are thoroughly understood and addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is fully explained.
- Relevant economic terms are used appropriately throughout the response.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included and fully explained.
- The response contains evidence of effective and balanced synthesis or evaluation.
- The use of information from the text/data is appropriate, relevant, and is used to formulate a reasoned argument supported by analysis/evaluation.
Command term
"Evaluate" requires candidates to make an appraisal by weighing up the strengths and limitations. Opinions and conclusions should be presented clearly and supported with appropriate evidence and sound argument.
Answers may include:
- terminology: poverty, inequality
- a poverty cycle diagram
- a Lorenz curve diagram
- a minimum wage/price diagram
- an indirect tax/externalities/subsidies diagram
N.B. diagrams that have already been given in answers to parts (c), (d), (e) or (f), and then referred to in part (g), should be rewarded.
Policies that are being used:
- encouraging workers to shift from agriculture, fishing and the informal sector to other growth sectors (Text D, paragraphs 3 and/or 2)
Strengths
Limitations
- higher wages and productivity which
could help break the poverty cycle
- may increase urbanisation which
depletes rural areas and leads to more
congestion/pollution in towns
- may reduce over-fishing and
deforestation which, if unchecked, would result in loss of income for workers in these industries in the future
- may reduce food supplies, which may result in higher prices for necessities
- may result in loss of income for workers in these industries in the short run
- employment and wages will be less
influenced by natural disasters and thus result in a reduction in poverty
- growth sectors (such as tourism and
insurance) may not be suitable for many
workers
- increased government spending due to expansionary fiscal policies (Text D, paragraphs 4 and 5)
Strengths
Limitations
- more spending on education and health
care
- health and education services still
inadequate in many areas
- government spending will add to AD
leading to higher growth and incomes
- budget deficit will require borrowing
- high population growth (over 14 % in less
than 10 years) means that government spending will have to increase even faster to maintain current living standards (Table 4)
- removal of quota on pork imports and other free trade measures due to membership of ASEAN (Text D, paragraphs 4 and 6)
Strengths
Limitations
∙ lowers food prices for consumers,
especially for the poor who spend
proportionately more on food
- reduces demand for domestic farm
products and therefore may reduce
farmers' incomes
- tariffs on rice imports (Text D, paragraph 7)
Strengths
Limitations
- higher prices and output for rice farmers
leading to higher incomes
- regressive impact of higher food prices on low-income households
- tariff revenues used to subsidise farm equipment etc will increase productivity and will increase rural incomes
- may strain trade relations with other economies leading to a trade war
- more spending on the public health care system, financed by indirect taxes on tobacco etc (Text E, paragraph 1)
Strengths
Limitations
- can improve health and other indicators, especially in rural areas (Text D, paragraph 4)
- indirect taxes (especially on smoking and alcohol) are regressive
- can raise the HDI (through increased life expectancy), which is relatively low
(Table 4)
- population is increasing fast and therefore the extra spending unlikely to be enough (Table 4)
- increased conditional cash payments (Text E, paragraph 2)
Strengths
Limitations
- can directly decrease level of inequality and raise incomes above the poverty line, potentially decreasing the level of inequality
- will raise government expenditure and therefore probably the budget deficit
- conditions will encourage schooling,
improving human capital and future earning
potential
- because consumption spending is a
high proportion (over 70\%) of GDP,
these payments and all extra government spending will have a strong expansionary effect on GDP which may be inflationary (Text D, paragraph 1 and Table 3)
- can help regions/households escape the poverty trap
- higher incomes for lower income earners
could reduce Gini coefficient which is relatively high and shift Lorenz curve
inwards (Table 4)
- subsidies for farmers (Text D, paragraph 7) and private bus drivers (Text E, paragraph 3)
Strengths
Limitations
- encourages public transport and food
production
- reduces government funds for other purposes, leading to opportunity costs and/or wider budget deficit
- may counteract the rising food and fuel prices (Text D, paragraph 4)
- may encourage inefficiency and more fuel consumption, leading to pollution
- rise in minimum prices charged by private bus drivers (Text E, paragraph 3)
Strengths
Limitations
- raises their wages
- increases welfare loss
- may not increase incomes if demand is relatively elastic
- regressive, since the poor more likely to use buses
- increased spending on infrastructure (Text F)
Strengths
Limitations
- will reduce the unemployment rate, raise productivity and connect the poor to more opportunities
- requires more government spending,
leading to opportunity costs and/or wider budget deficit
- can diversify the economy, making it less susceptible to supply shocks and possibly will also increase exports
- may require more imports of capital in the short run and/or more FDI, leading to widening deficit on the current account
- increased use of grants and loans received through ODA (Text F;
Figure 2)
Strengths
Limitations
- grants and loans can effectively break the poverty cycle
- loans must be paid back
- training will raise productivity
- may lead to dependency
- disadvantaged groups, such as women, and growth areas, such as tourism, are targeted
Overall:
- poverty rates and the Gini coefficient have been reduced, while the HDI index has improved (Table 4), implying that measures have had some success
- pace of poverty reduction still low and many workers still in informal economy (Text D, paragraph 3)
- rising food and fuel prices will further widen the distribution of real incomes (Text D, paragraph 4).
Examiners should be aware that candidates may take a different approach or consider other policies which, if appropriate, should be rewarded.