2.2 The covalent model
- Syllabus
- First assessment 2025
- Topic
- 2.2
- Level
- HL
A covalent bond is the electrostatic attraction between a shared electron pair and the nuclei of the bonded atoms. Lewis formulas show valence electrons and shared pairs.
Use the octet tendency to place shared and lone pairs, while remembering that the assessed Lewis scope allows up to four electron pairs around an atom.
Build a Lewis formula by counting all valence electrons, choosing a skeleton, completing outer octets and placing any remainder on the central atom. Then recount electrons and formal charge; a shared pair contributes to the attraction between both nuclei rather than belonging exclusively to either atom.
Charged-species check: NH₄⁺ has 5 + 4(1) − 1 = 8 valence electrons, so draw four N–H shared pairs, no lone pair on N, enclose the ion in brackets and write the overall + charge. A final audit must match the available electron total, complete the required outer-shell arrangements and reproduce the species charge; lone pairs, shared pairs and formal charges answer different parts of that audit.
Representative question
Draw the Lewis formula of the HCN molecule.
Hx˙CxxxxxN:N:
Accept any combination of dots or
crosses to represent electrons, or
lines to represent electron pairs.
| Bond | Shared pairs | Relative length and strength |
|---|---|---|
| Single | 1 | Longest and weakest of the three |
| Double | 2 | Shorter and stronger |
| Triple | 3 | Shortest and strongest |
More shared electron pairs increase electron density between nuclei, so the bond becomes shorter and stronger.
For the same pair of atoms, increasing bond order generally shortens and strengthens the bond because more electron density lies between the nuclei. Use that comparison locally: bond enthalpy also depends on the atoms and molecular environment, so any triple bond is not automatically stronger than every unrelated single bond.
Representative question
Compare, giving a reason, the length of the bond between the carbon atoms in ethyne with that in ethane, C2H6.
«ethyne» shorter AND a greater number of shared/bonding electrons OR
«ethyne» shorter AND stronger bond
In a coordination bond, both electrons in the shared pair come from the same atom. The bond can be represented by an arrow from the electron-pair donor to the acceptor.
Identify the donor atom or ligand and the acceptor, including coordination bonds in transition-element complexes at HL.
In NH₃→BF₃ the nitrogen lone pair supplies both bonding electrons, so the arrow starts at N and ends at B. The arrow records how the pair originated; after formation it is a shared covalent pair, and in a complex the same donor logic identifies each ligand–metal bond.
Representative question
State the precise type of bond formation between the cyanide ion and the iron ion.
bond
coordination
Marking guidance:
Accept dative/coordination
covalent.
VSEPR predicts molecular shape by arranging electron domains around a central atom to minimize repulsion. Lone pairs repel more strongly than bonding pairs and therefore alter common bond angles.
| Step | Decision |
|---|---|
| 1 | Count bonding and lone-pair electron domains |
| 2 | Assign electron-domain geometry |
| 3 | Ignore lone pairs when naming molecular geometry |
| 4 | Adjust expected bond angles for lone-pair repulsion |
NH₃ has four electron domains around N, so its electron-domain geometry is tetrahedral but its molecular shape is trigonal pyramidal; the lone pair compresses the H–N–H angle below 109.5°. Count a double bond as one domain and distinguish electron geometry from the shape named using atoms only.
Representative question
Deduce the electron domain geometry and molecular geometry of SO2.
Electron domain geometry:
Molecular domain geometry:
Electron domain geometry: trigonal planar
Molecular domain geometry: bent / V-shaped / angular
Apply ECF from Lewis formula.
A bond is polar when a difference in electronegativity gives unequal sharing of the bonding electrons. The more electronegative atom carries partial negative character.
Compare electronegativities, assign partial charges, and draw the bond-dipole arrow toward the more electronegative atom.
For H–Cl, chlorine is more electronegative, so label Hδ⁺–Clδ⁻ and point the dipole arrow toward Cl. Electronegativity difference predicts unequal sharing within that bond; it does not by itself decide the polarity of the whole molecule.
Representative question
Describe the nature of the bond between oxygen and phosphorus. Use sections 9 and 17 of the data booklet.
" 3.4−2.2=1.2,(3.4+2.2)/2=2.8 "
Electronegativity difference is 1.2 .
AND
Average electronegativity is 2.8
polar covalent
Molecular polarity depends on both the polarity of individual bonds and the three-dimensional geometry of the molecule or ion. Bond dipoles can cancel or produce a net dipole moment.
Draw or infer the geometry, place each bond dipole, and check whether the vector sum is zero. Do not decide molecular polarity from a single bond alone.
CO₂ contains polar C=O bonds, but their equal opposite dipoles cancel in a linear molecule. In bent H₂O they do not cancel, so the molecule has a net dipole. Always establish the three-dimensional geometry before adding dipoles as vectors.
Representative question
Explain the polarity of the SO2 molecule.
«both» bonds are polar / electronegativity difference «between O and S»
«bond» dipoles do not cancel each other / there is a net dipole «because bonds are at an angle less than 180∘ »
Marking guidance:
Accept unsymmetrical distribution of charge OR dipoles add to give a «partial» positive «charge» on S and a «partial» negative «charge» on the O atoms for M2.
Apply ECF from molecular geometry.
| Material | Structural evidence | Property or use explained |
|---|---|---|
| Diamond | each C covalently bonded in a rigid 3D network | very hard; high melting point; no mobile charge carriers |
| Graphite | strong covalent sheets with delocalized electrons; weak attractions between sheets | conducts along sheets; layers slide, so it is soft/lubricating |
| Graphene | one atom-thick covalent sheet with delocalized electrons | strong, light and electrically conducting |
| Fullerenes | finite carbon cages or tubes rather than an infinite 3D network | molecular shape and intermolecular contacts give properties distinct from diamond/graphite |
| Silicon | extended covalent structure with limited charge mobility | semiconductor behaviour; detailed doping is outside this card |
| Silicon dioxide | 3D Si–O covalent network, not discrete SiO₂ molecules | hard and high-melting because many strong covalent bonds must be overcome |
Decide conductivity by available mobile charges, not by the word covalent alone.
Explain a network material property by connecting the structure and bonding arrangement to the relevant mobility, strength, or dimensional feature.
Diamond is hard because each carbon is held in a three-dimensional covalent network, while graphite conducts along layers through delocalized electrons and its layers can slide. Silicon dioxide is also an extended network: describe network atoms, not discrete SiO₂ molecules, when explaining its high melting point.
Representative question
Identify three allotropes of carbon and describe their structures.
Allotropes:
diamond
graphite
fullerene
graphene;
Structures:
Diamond:
tetrahedral arrangement of (carbon) atoms/each carbon bonded to four others / sp3 and 3D/covalent network structure;
Graphite:
each carbon bonded to three others (in a trigonal planar arrangement) / sp2 and 2D / layers of (carbon) atoms;
Fullerene:
each (carbon) atom bonded to three others (in a trigonal arrangement) / sp2 and joined in a ball/cage/sphere/connected hexagons and pentagons;
Graphene:
each carbon bonded to three others (in a trigonal arrangement) / sp2 and 2D structure;
| Force | Evidence used to identify it |
|---|---|
| London dispersion | Present; increases with molecular size and electron count |
| Dipole-induced dipole | A permanent dipole induces a dipole in a neighbour |
| Dipole-dipole | Permanent dipoles attract |
| Hydrogen bonding | Hydrogen bonded to a strongly electronegative atom creates the required interaction |
Start with molecular size and polarity, then check for the structural requirement for hydrogen bonding. More than one IMF can be present.
All molecules have London dispersion forces. Add permanent dipole–dipole attraction when a net molecular dipole exists, and add hydrogen bonding only when the required H–N, H–O or H–F environment and an acceptor lone pair are present. Name every relevant force before deciding which dominates.
Representative question
Outline how a hydrogen bond is formed.
H that is «covalently» bonded to a «highly» electronegative atom
is attracted to the electronegative atom of neighbouring molecule
Marking guidance:
Accept a labelled diagram for both marks.
Accept "F, O or N" for "electronegative atom".
For the relative comparison in this topic, London dispersion forces are weaker than dipole-dipole forces, which are weaker than hydrogen bonding. Molecular size also affects dispersion strength.
Stronger intermolecular attractions generally reduce volatility. Explain conductivity and solubility by considering whether charged particles are available and whether solute–solvent attractions are favourable.
Compare like evidence: pentane has stronger dispersion forces and a higher boiling point than butane because its electron cloud is larger. The simple London < dipole–dipole < hydrogen-bond ordering is a guide for comparable molecules, not a rule that ignores molecular size and the number of interaction sites.
Representative question
Explain, in terms of the intermolecular forces present, the trend in the boiling points of the first four alkenes.
| Alkene | Boiling point / K |
|---|---|
| ethene | 169 |
| propene | 225 |
| but-1-ene | 267 |
| pent-1-ene | 303 |
London (dispersion) forces «only»
stronger forces of attraction with increasing chain length / larger electron cloud /molar mass
Marking guidance:
Accept dispersion forces/ instantaneous / transient / induced dipole attractions for M1. Do not accept van der Waals' forces for M1.
Accept "more electrons" for "larger electron cloud" in M2.
Accept increased surface area.
Chromatography separates components because they have different attractions to the stationary and mobile phases. A component that is more strongly attracted to the mobile phase travels farther.
Rf=distancetravelledbycomponent/distancetravelledbysolventfront
Rf is a dimensionless ratio of distances measured from the same origin under the same conditions. Because a component cannot pass the solvent front, a valid result lies from 0 to 1; a value above 1 signals a distance or origin error. Operational details beyond the separation principle are not assessed here.
If a spot moves 3.2 cm while the solvent front moves 8.0 cm, Rf = 0.40. A larger Rf means greater relative affinity for the mobile phase under those conditions, but values from different solvents, stationary phases or temperatures are not directly interchangeable.
Representative question
Explain how the separation of inks is achieved using paper chromatography.
«inks» have different attraction to mobile phase AND stationary phase OR
«inks» separated based on solubilities in/affinities to the two phases OR
separations based on polarities/polar attractions
continuous cycle of adsorption and desorption/dissolution
OR
ink/sample/solute moves when in solvent AND does not move when on paper
Marking guidance:
Allow answers in terms of an equilibrium/partitioning for M1.
Resonance structures represent alternative valid positions for multiple bonds while preserving the atom framework. The actual bonding is described using delocalized electrons, not a molecule switching between drawings.
Keep atom connectivity and total electrons consistent, draw each valid arrangement, and use delocalization to describe the shared bonding picture.
For CO₃²⁻, place the C=O bond in each of three valid positions while keeping atom positions and total charge fixed. The observed C–O bonds are equivalent because the π electrons are delocalized; the ion does not alternate among three localized structures.
Representative question
Predict, with a reason, the bond lengths of the nitrate ion. Use section 11 of the data booklet.
124 «x 10−12 m »
delocalized electrons / resonance structure
Accept any length between 115 « x10−12m » and 135 « 10−12m » for M1.
Accept 'intermediate between single and double', or 'bond order greater than 1 but less than 2' for M2.
Question
Answers
Notes
Total
Benzene is an important resonance example: alternative ring structures place the double bonds in different positions, while the actual π electrons are delocalized across the ring.
Use the resonance drawings as representations of one delocalized bonding system, not as separate rapidly changing molecular forms.
Benzene's six equal C–C bonds and greater stability than a localized triene support a delocalized π system above and below the ring. Use the two Kekulé drawings or a circle as representations of the same molecule, never as an equilibrium between two species.
Representative question
The Styrene molecule is a derivative of benzene.
State both a chemical and physical reason structure A is a better representation of benzene.
Chemical reason:
Physical reason:
Chemical reason: Any one of: does not «easily» undergo «electrophilic» addition.
OR undergoes electrophilic substitution reactions.
OR enthalpy of hydrogenation is not 3 x that of cyclohexene/ less exothermic than 3 x that of cyclohexene.
OR all «C-C» bond energies are the same.
Physical reason: Any one of: all bond lengths are the same.
OR
all bond angles are the same / molecule is planar.
Marking guidance:
Award [1 max] for each property.
Award [1 max] if properties are reversed.
Some HL species have five or six electron domains around a central atom. Draw the Lewis formula, count the domains, and apply VSEPR to assign the corresponding geometry.
For five domains, start from trigonal-bipyramidal electron geometry; lone pairs prefer equatorial positions because that reduces 90° interactions, producing common shapes such as seesaw and T-shaped. For six domains, start from octahedral geometry; removing one or two lone-pair positions gives common square-pyramidal or square-planar molecular shapes. Name molecular shape from atom positions after the electron-domain arrangement is fixed.
Five bonding domains give trigonal-bipyramidal PCl₅ and six give octahedral SF₆. If lone pairs are present, keep the electron-domain arrangement but remove lone-pair positions when naming molecular shape, choosing positions that minimize the strongest repulsions.
Representative question
Deduce the molecular geometry of PCl3 and PCl5.
PCl3:
PCl5 :
PCl3. trigonal pyramid PCl5. trigonal bipyramid
formalcharge=valenceelectrons−non−bondingelectrons−1/2(bondingelectrons)
Calculate formal charges for each valid Lewis structure, then compare the charge distribution when choosing a preferred representation. Preserve the total charge of the species.
After calculating every atom, verify that formal charges sum to the overall species charge. Prefer a valid structure that minimizes charge magnitude and separation, placing negative formal charge on the more electronegative atom when other evidence is comparable; formal charge is bookkeeping, not measured partial charge.
Representative question
Outline, in terms of formal charge, why Lewis formula 2 is preferred.
Lewis formula 1: O-1 AND P+1 «are the only formal charges»
Lewis formula 2: formal charges zero/closest to zero «and hence preferred»
Accept labelling for M1:
| Bond type | Orbital combination | Electron density |
|---|---|---|
| σ | Head-on overlap | Along the bond axis |
| π | Lateral p-orbital overlap | On opposite sides of the bond axis |
A multiple bond contains one sigma bond plus one or more pi bonds. Use the overlap and density location to distinguish the two.
Ethene contains five σ bonds—four C–H and one C–C—and one π bond; ethyne contains three σ and two π bonds. The σ framework fixes the bond axis, while sideways p-orbital overlap creates π density and restricts rotation about a double bond.
Representative question
Describe how sigma ( σ ) and pi ( π ) bonds are formed.
σ bonds:
π bonds:
σ bonds:
orbital overlap/high electron density along internuclear axis/between nuclei
OR
head-on/end-to-end overlap «of atomic/hybridized orbitals»
π bonds:
«orbital» overlap/high electron density above and below internuclear/bond axis
OR
sideways overlap «of parallel p orbitals»
Marking guidance:
Award [2 max] for appropriate
diagrams.
Hybridization analysis follows a chain: Lewis formula → electron domains → geometry → hybrid orbital description. It describes mixing atomic orbitals to form hybrid orbitals used in bonding.
Count the electron domains around the relevant atom, identify the geometry, then assign the corresponding hybridization description for the molecule or ion.
Treat each single, double or triple bond as one electron domain. Four domains map to sp³, three to sp² and two to sp; thus methane carbon is sp³, each ethene carbon sp² and each ethyne carbon sp. Hybridization follows the Lewis/VSEPR model rather than replacing it.
Representative question
Deduce the hybridization of the carbon atom and the number of sigma and pi bonds that it forms.
Hybridization:
Sigma bonds:
Pi bonds:
Hybridization: sp
Sigma bonds: 2 AND Pi bonds: 2
Retrieve the covalent pathway: shared pairs and bond order lead to geometry, polarity and molecular polarity; structure determines network properties, IMF behaviour and chromatography; HL representations extend to resonance, formal charge, sigma/pi bonds and hybridization.
Check the representation first, then count domains, apply geometry, identify polarity or forces, and connect the structure to the requested property or HL bonding description.