Refer to the paper 1 section A markbands below when awarding marks.
The command term "outline" requires candidates to give a brief account of social identity theory, referring to one relevant study.
Responses should present the key concepts of the social identity theory such as social categorization (ingroup/outgroup), social comparison, and positive ingroup distinctiveness, with reference to one relevant study.
Relevant studies may include, but are not limited to:
- Tajfel's studies on social groups and identities
- Sherif et al.'s Robber's Cave study (1961)
- Cialdini et al.'s Basking in Reflected Glory study (1976)
- Abrams's study of the role of social identity theory on levels of conformity (1990)
- Maass's study on the role of social identity theory on violence (2003).
If a candidate refers to more than one study, credit should be given only to the first study.
If a candidate outlines the theory without making reference to a study, up to a maximum of [4] should be awarded.
If a candidate only describes an appropriate study, without making reference to social identity theory, up to a maximum of [3] should be awarded.
Section A markbands
Marks Level descriptor 0 The answer does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below. 1 to 3 There is an attempt to answer the question, but knowledge and understanding is limited, often inaccurate, or of marginal relevance to the question. 4 to 6 The question is partially answered. Knowledge and understanding is accurate but limited. Either the command term is not effectively addressed or the response is not sufficiently explicit in answering the question. 7 to 8 The question is answered in a focused and effective manner and meets the demands of the command term. The response is supported by appropriate and accurate knowledge and understanding of research.