Practise IB Psychology SL 2.3.7 by explaining research methods and evaluating how evidence supports conclusions about biological processes and behaviour.
Describe the "etic" concept, making reference to one example.
Refer to the paper 1 section A markbands below when awarding marks.
"Etic" refers to an approach to studying the role of culture on behaviour. This approach describes or explains behaviours across cultures to find out what could be universal in human behaviour. Studies may be focused on psychological issues related to universal human behaviour or finding similarities/differences across cultures.
A description of the "etic" concept may include, but is not limited to:
- a deductive approach based on established theory
- often uses an ethnocentric approach
- use of standardized materials that have established reliability
- the goal is generalization to the human population
- use of "experts" trained in psychology.
Examples of "etic" research may include, but are not limited to:
- Cole and Scribner (1974) - research in cultural differences in memory strategies
- Kashima and Triandis (1986) on cultural differences in attributional styles
- Berry (1967) - variation of Asch's conformity study
- Kleinman (1982) on cultural differences in expression of depression.
Candidates may describe the etic approach making reference to an example that is not a research study (eg studying mental health). As long as they describe the example clearly and with detail they may receive full marks.
If a candidate describes the "etic" concept without making reference to one example from the sociocultural level of analysis, the response should be awarded up to a maximum of [4].
If a candidate only describes an appropriate example without describing the etic concept, the response should be awarded up to a maximum of [3].
Section A markbands
Marks Level descriptor
0 The answer does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1 to 3 There is an attempt to answer the question, but knowledge and understanding is limited, often inaccurate, or of marginal relevance to the question.
4 to 6 The question is partially answered. Knowledge and understanding is accurate but limited. Either the command term is not effectively addressed or the response is not sufficiently explicit in answering the question.
7 to 8 The question is answered in a focused and effective manner and meets the demands of the command term. The response is supported by appropriate and accurate knowledge and understanding of research.