Juliet is a sociologist who wants to investigate if income affects happiness amongst doctors. This question asks you to review Juliet's methods and conclusions.
Juliet obtained a list of email addresses of doctors who work in her city. She contacted them and asked them to fill in an anonymous questionnaire. Participants were asked to state their annual income and to respond to a set of questions. The responses were used to determine a happiness score out of 100 . Of the 415 doctors on the list, 11 replied.
Describe one criticism that can be made about the validity of Juliet's investigation.
Juliet's results are summarized in the following table.

Juliet wants to create a model to predict how changing annual income might affect happiness scores. To do this, she assumes that annual income in dollars, X, is the independent variable and the happiness score, Y, is the dependent variable.
She first considers a linear model of the form
Find the value of c, of d and of e.
Find the coefficient of determination for each of the two models she considers.
Hence compare the two models.
Juliet decides to use the coefficient of determination to choose between these two models.
Comment on the validity of her decision.
After presenting the results of her investigation, a colleague questions whether Juliet's sample is representative of all doctors in the city.
A report states that the mean annual income of doctors in the city is $ 80000. Juliet decides to carry out a test to determine whether her sample could realistically be taken from a population with a mean of $ 80000.











