IB ESS HL 3.2 Human Impacts on Biodiversity Question Bank
Practise IB ESS HL 3.2 by evaluating threat evidence, invasive-species control, hotspot conservation and biosphere-integrity risks.
- Syllabus
- First assessment 2026
- Course
- ESS HL
- Level
- HL
Practise IB ESS HL 3.2 by evaluating threat evidence, invasive-species control, hotspot conservation and biosphere-integrity risks.

Figure:Global biodiversity extinction-risk categories

Figure:Changes in species extinction risk from 1980 to 2015
State the category with the lowest approximate percentage of threatened species in the extinction-risk chart shown above.
bony fishes;
Outline two reasons why amphibians have the highest approximate percentage of threatened species, as shown in the extinction-risk chart shown above.
a. They require both aquatic and terrestrial habitats/specialised niches so more likely to be affected by habitat loss/limitations;
b. They have permeable/soft skin more vulnerable to disease/UV/pollution;
c. Few amphibians have great public/charismatic appeal attracting protection/conservation efforts;
d. They generally have very limited parental care so offspring more vulnerable / high mortality rate in offspring;
e. They often depend on small bodies of water that are particularly vulnerable to drought/global warming/human development of wetlands
Note: Only credit marks that are explicitly related to the vulnerability of amphibians. General factors such as habitat destruction, hunting or climate change alone are TV.
Using the extinction-risk chart shown above, state the approximate percentage of sharks and rays that are threatened.
Accept any percentage in the range 31-34;
Outline three reasons why the trend for corals is different to the other categories shown in the species-extinction trend chart shown above.
corals ...
a. are sedentary/cannot migrate (to avoid pollution or other risks);
b. are r-selected species so high mortality rates (in planktonic phase);
c. (have delicate symbiotic relationship) highly sensitive to small changes in abiotic conditions;
d. are impacted worldwide through ocean acidification (causing bleaching);
e. are impacted worldwide by global warming/climate change /warmer waters (causing bleaching);
f. inhabit areas with high human polluting activity such as urban waste/agricultural run-off/oil spills/aquaculture;
g. have value as souvenirs/trophy/collectors' items;
h. are fragile/easily damaged unintentionally (by boats/nets/storms etc);
i. have very slow growth rates (in sedentary phase); j. have limited ranges/ocean depths/habitats where they can live;
Credit any response that is consistent with the increasing trend of extinction in corals.
Do not credit "pollution" alone there must be reference to a relevant source of pollutant as in MPf
The introduction of a species into an ecosystem could be considered a form of pollution. Discuss this statement.
The following guide for using the markbands suggests certain features that may be offered in responses. The five headings coincide with the criteria in each of the markbands (although ESS terminology has been conflated with 'understanding concepts'). This guide simply provides some possible inclusions and should not be seen as requisite or comprehensive. It outlines the kind of elements to look for when deciding on the appropriate mark band and the specific mark within that band.
Answers may demonstrate:
- understanding concepts terminology: definition of pollution; chemical/thermal/biotic pollution; anthropogenic; toxicity; environmental impacts; alien/invasive/native species; competition; competitive exclusion; predation; disease; disruption; biodiversity; genetic diversity; pest control; steady state equilibrium; resilience; adaptability; habitat degradation,
- breadth in addressing and linking a range of advantageous and disadvantageous aspects of various introduced species with characteristic features of environmental pollution
- examples of a number of introduced species and a range of their characteristic negative and positive impacts on the equilibrium of ecosystems.
- balanced analysis evaluating the extent to which introduced species may, or may not, validly be identified as a form of pollution, acknowledging both similarities and differences from other forms of pollution, and advantages and disadvantages to natural ecosystems.
- a conclusion that is consistent with, and supported by, analysis and examples given e.g. While it is important to recognise that alien species may have potential benefits on ecosystems and human societies, a number of factors indicate that alien species being classified as pollutants as they are anthropogenic in origin and have detrimental effects on the equilibrium of native ecosystems and biodiversity.
Please see markbands on page 19.

Figure:Conservation status of indigenous species groups in New Zealand
With reference to Figure: Conservation status of indigenous species groups in New Zealand, identify the group of species most 'at risk of becoming threatened'.
Reptiles;
Only mark the first response if more than one answer is given.