IB Economics SL 3.3 Macroeconomic Objectives Question Bank
Compare macroeconomic objectives and explain the trade-offs among growth, employment, price stability and equity.
- Syllabus
- First assessment 2022
- Course
- Economics SL
- Level
- SL
Compare macroeconomic objectives and explain the trade-offs among growth, employment, price stability and equity.
Study the following extract and answer the questions that follow.
Japan-European Union Economic Partnership Agreement (JEEPA)
(1) In July 2017, the Japan-European Union Economic Partnership Agreement (JEEPA) was announced and it may come into force in 2019. Jointly, Japan and the European Union (EU) currently account for 28 % of global gross domestic product (GDP). The trade agreement could raise the EU's exports to Japan by 34 % and Japan's exports to the EU by 29 %. Economists say that this trade agreement marks a determined effort to combat rising protectionism and sends a powerful signal that cooperation, not trade protection, is the way to tackle global challenges.
(2) The largest benefit to Japan will be for Japanese car manufacturers, as Europe will gradually lower tariffs from 10 % on Japanese cars. Car tariffs are a big concern for Japanese car manufacturers, who struggle to compete with South Korean car manufacturers. South Korean cars are sold to the EU tariff-free thanks to a free trade agreement signed in 2011. Within Europe, car manufacturers are one of the largest sources of jobs. Car manufacturers in the EU are concerned that cutting tariffs on car imports from Japan may lead to a large increase of Japanese cars into the European market.
(3) The trade agreement will also resolve non-tariff barriers, such as technical requirements and regulations. More importantly, however, the EU and Japan will make their environmental and safety standards on cars the same, which will make trade easier.
(4) Japanese politicians have been defending their relatively inefficient farmers for a long time. Now, Japan will lower tariffs on European meat, dairy products and wine, cutting 85 % of the tariffs on food products coming into Japan. This includes removing the current 30 % tariff on some European cheeses, such as cheddar and gouda cheese. However, imported camembert cheese will face a quota. This may be because Japan produces some camembert cheese.
(5) JEEPA is particularly alarming for United States (US) beef and pork farmers because Japan has been the biggest export market for US beef and the second biggest export market for US pork. Any preferential tariff that EU farmers receive will make it much tougher for American farmers to sell meat in Japan.
(6) With this trade agreement, the EU and Japan are trying to promote the values of economic cooperation and environmental conservation, which are both important for long-term economic growth and sustainability. However, JEEPA faces significant challenges because it will have to be passed by the Japanese Parliament, the European Parliament and European national governments. There is no guarantee that all governments will agree to the economic partnership. 15 July 2017; Japan-EU trade agreement may hurt U.S. meat producers, by Katherine Hyunjung Lee, Jul 12, 2017, Medill News Service, https://dc.medill.northwestern.edu; and A new trade deal between the EU and Japan, The Economist (London, England), Jul 8th 2017, https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2017/07/08/a-new-trade-deal-between-the-eu-and
japan. © The Economist Newspaper Limited, London, July 8th 2017]
}
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain the impact of the trade agreement between Japan and the EU (JEEPA) on Japan's economic growth (paragraph (1)).
Level
Marks
0
The work does not meet a standard described by the descriptors below.
1
There is a correct diagram OR an accurate written response.
1-2
For drawing an accurate, labelled AD/AS diagram showing a shift of the AD curve to the right and an increase in the price level and real GDP OR for an explanation that the trade deal could raise Japan's exports by 29 %, increasing Japan's export revenue, a component of AD. This may increase Japan's real GDP, thus leading to economic growth.
OR
For drawing an accurate, labelled AD/AS diagram showing a shift of the AD curve to the left and a decrease in the price level and real GDP OR for an explanation that the trade deal could raise Japan's exports by 29 % but also increase EU imports by 34 %, decreasing Japan's net exports, a component of AD. This may decrease Japan's real GDP, thus negatively affecting economic growth.
2
There is a correct diagram AND an accurate written response.
3-4
For drawing an accurate, labelled AD/AS diagram showing a shift of the AD curve to the right and an increase in the price level and real GDP AND for an explanation that the trade deal could raise Japan's exports by 29 %, increasing Japan's export revenue, a component of AD. This may increase Japan's real GDP, thus leading to economic growth.
OR
For drawing an accurate, labelled AD/AS diagram showing a shift of the AD curve to the left and a decrease in the price level and real GDP AND for an explanation that the trade deal could raise Japan's exports by 29\% but also increase EU imports by 34 %, decreasing Japan's net exports, a component of AD. This may decrease Japan's real GDP, thus negatively affecting economic growth.


Candidates who incorrectly label diagrams can be awarded a maximum of [3].
For AD/AS, the vertical axis may be "price level" or any similar terms such as "average (general) price level". For the horizontal axis, "real (national) output/income" or "real GDP". Any relevant abbreviations are acceptable.
A title is not necessary.
Discuss the view that economic growth always raises living standards in a country.
Answers may include:
- definitions of economic growth and living standards
- explanation that economic growth may lead to a rise in living standards through: increasing incomes; a fall in unemployment; more tax revenue to improve public services and provide merit goods
- diagram to show economic growth increasing incomes and employment
- examples of economic growth increasing living standards
- synthesis or evaluation (discuss).
Discussion may include: economic growth increasing living standards in terms of the: income benefits of economic growth going to the richest people and widening the income disparity; economic growth leading to negative externalities; not being sustainable; impact growth has on inflation.
Examiners should be aware that candidates may take a different approach which, if appropriate, should be rewarded.
Opinions or conclusions should be presented clearly and should be supported by appropriate examples.
N.B. Diagrams are not essential in part (b) for this question to access level 3 and 4.
Assessment Criteria
Part (b) 15 marks
Level 0 (0 marks): The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
Level 1 (1-5 marks): There is little understanding of the specific demands of the question. Relevant economic terms are not defined. There is very little knowledge of relevant economic theory. There are significant errors.
Level 2 (6-9 marks): There is some understanding of the specific demands of the question. Some relevant economic terms are defined. There is some knowledge of relevant economic theory. There are some errors.
Level 3 (10-12 marks): There is understanding of the specific demands of the question. Relevant economic terms are defined. Relevant economic theory is explained and applied. Where appropriate, diagrams are included and applied. Where appropriate, examples are used. There is an attempt at synthesis or evaluation. There are few errors.
Level 4 (13-15 marks): There is clear understanding of the specific demands of the question. Relevant economic terms are clearly defined. Relevant economic theory is clearly explained and applied. Where appropriate, diagrams are included and applied effectively. Where appropriate, examples are used effectively. There is evidence of appropriate synthesis or evaluation. There are no significant errors.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Text A — Overview of North Macedonia
(1) North Macedonia is a small, landlocked nation that shares borders with five countries, including Bulgaria and Greece. Bulgaria and Greece are members of the European Union (EU) common market, which North Macedonia hopes to join soon. Since the country began negotiating for EU membership, trade with the EU has increased rapidly and now accounts for 75 % of North Macedonia's exports and 62 % of its imports.
(2) Despite its small market, with a population of approximately 2 million, North Macedonia's proximity to the EU, low wages and expected entry into the common market have attracted foreign investors. Greece, its richest neighbour, was its third highest source of foreign investment in 2019. The lower cost of living also appeals to Greek tourists.
(3) EU companies have invested in the financial, telecommunication, energy and food processing industries in North Macedonia. Many of the most profitable companies are from the EU. If EU membership is granted, foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows may increase as firms located in North Macedonia will be allowed to bypass all custom checks and enjoy tariff-free trade within the common market. One particular challenge for North Macedonia, however, is that most of the profits of foreign companies are likely to be repatriated (sent back to the companies' home countries).
(4) In 2018, North Macedonia's export revenue was US $7.57 billion and its import expenditure was US$9.56 billion. The country's main exports are iron and steel, clothing and accessories, and food products. Food, livestock and consumer goods account for 33 % of imports while the remainder are machinery, petroleum and other materials needed for the industrial production process.
(5) The manufacturing sector, which now employs 31 % of the labour force, has gained more importance. The agricultural sector remains strong, contributes over 10 % of North Macedonia's gross domestic product (GDP) and employs about 16 % of the country's workforce.
(6) The unemployment rate decreased from over 30 % in 2010 to 17.3 % in 2019. However, youth unemployment is almost 40 %. Over 20 % of the population lives below the poverty line. Unemployment and poverty contribute to high rates of emigration. More than 20 % of the North Macedonian population have emigrated since 1994, mostly to the EU. As a member of the EU, North Macedonia will enjoy free movement of labour which will make it easy for its citizens to live and work in other EU countries.
Text B - North Macedonia's economic reforms
(1) To be considered for EU membership, North Macedonia implemented a series of supply-side policies to reform its economy. The EU imposes strict requirements for membership but provides financial assistance to countries preparing for membership. North Macedonia has received 633 million euros (the currency of the EU) to help with the reforms.
(2) Most of the supply-side policies seek to improve the international competitiveness of North Macedonia's industries. The authorities are increasing access to education and training for workers. The expansion of the transport network and other infrastructure is also expected to increase efficiency.
(3) Protection of the environment is also on the list of requirements for EU membership. North Macedonia aims to reduce its dependence on coal and to instead promote the use of solar, wind and hydropower technologies. These low-carbon energy sources would help decrease its air pollution, which is among the worst in Europe.
(4) The reforms, which started in 2014, have shown progress. Exports and manufacturing output are more diversified and more concentrated on high-value products. To attract FDI, North Macedonia maintains one of the lowest tax rates on corporate income in the region. The central bank also prevents the denar (North Macedonia's currency) from appreciating against the euro through managing foreign reserves. However, skill shortages and a mismatch of skills with those required by companies discourage foreign firms from investing. Important investment gaps in public infrastructure also remain.
Text C - North Macedonia's trade agreements
North Macedonia participates in five free trade agreements (FTAs), that together cover 95 % of its exports and 78 % of its imports. Most of its trade with the EU is already free but imports of wine, beef and fish products are still subject to quotas. North Macedonia is currently a net importer of agricultural and food products. All protectionist measures on EU products would be removed upon entry into the common market.

Table 1: Consumer Price Index (CPI) for North Macedonia (base year = 2010)

Table 2: Economic data for North Macedonia
Define the term unemployment rate indicated in bold in the text (Text A, paragraph 6).
Level
Marks
0
The work does not meet a standard described by the descriptors below.
1
Vague definition.
The idea that it includes/refers to people without a job.
2
Accurate definition.
An understanding that it is the proportion/percentage of the labour force which does not hold a job (is unemployed).
A formula for the unemployment rate is sufficient for L 2. eg
unemployment rate =( labour force number of unemployed )x100(%)
Using information from Table 1, calculate North Macedonia's annual rates of inflation between 2016 and 2019.
Inflation in 2017:
[(110.9−109.4)/109.4]×100=1.37%
Inflation in 2018:
[(112.5−110.9)/110.9]×100=1.44%
Inflation in 2019:
[(113.4−112.5)/112.5]×100=0.8%
Marking guidance:
Award [1] for any valid working but incorrect inflation rates calculated or for figures rounded to less than 2 dp or figures without the \% sign.
Award [2] for correct inflation rates (with or without workings).
Using your answer to part (b)(i), identify the year disinflation set in.
Using your answer to part (b)(i), identify the year disinflation sets in.
Marking guidance:
Award [1] for identifying 2019 as the year disinflation sets in ("after 2018" or "between 2018 and 2019" are also valid answers).
OFR applies.