Marks
Level descriptor
0
- The work does not meet a standard described by the descriptors below.
1-3
- The response indicates little understanding of the specific demands of the question.
- Economic theory is stated but it is not relevant.
- Economic terms are stated but they are not relevant or are used incorrectly.
- The response contains no evidence of synthesis or evaluation.
- The response contains no use of text/data or it is merely copied.
4-6
- The response indicates some understanding of the specific demands of the question.
- Relevant economic theory is described.
- Some relevant economic terms are included.
- The response contains evidence of relevant but superficial synthesis or evaluation.
- The response contains limited use of text/data.
7-9
- The response indicates understanding of the specific demands of the question, but these demands are only partially addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is partly explained.
- Some relevant economic terms are used appropriately.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included.
- The response contains evidence of appropriate synthesis or evaluation but lacks balance.
- The response includes some relevant information from the text/data.
10-12
- The specific demands of the question are understood and addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is explained.
- Relevant economic terms are used appropriately.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included and explained.
- The response contains evidence of appropriate synthesis or evaluation that is mostly balanced.
- The use of information from the text/data is generally appropriate, relevant, and applied correctly.
13-15
- The specific demands of the question are thoroughly understood and addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is fully explained.
- Relevant economic terms are used appropriately throughout the response.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included and fully explained.
- The response contains evidence of effective and balanced synthesis or evaluation.
- The use of information from the text/data is appropriate, relevant, and is used to formulate a reasoned argument supported by analysis/evaluation.
Command term
"Discuss" requires candidates to offer a considered and balanced review that includes a range of arguments, factors or hypotheses. Opinions or conclusions should be presented clearly and supported by appropriate evidence.
Terminology may include:
- growth
- sustainability
- economic well-being
- development
- externalities
- opportunity costs/choice
- nominal/real GDP.
Economic models to support analysis may include:
- an externalities diagram
- a PPC diagram
- an AD/AS diagram.
N.B. It should be noted that diagrams that have already been given in answers to parts (b), (c), (d), (e) or (f), and then referred to in part (g), should be rewarded.
Responses may include:
A discussion of the impact of economic growth on environmental sustainability
High economic growth
improves sustainability
High economic growth
damages sustainability
High economic growth may not impact sustainability
- Growth in the secondary and tertiary sectors, which may damage the environment less than agriculture (Text A, paragraph 1)
- Employment increasing due to economic growth may increase education which may lead to more understanding about environmental sustainability (Text A, paragraph 1) or
- More employment could lead to higher levels of income and allow for more environmentally sustainable living (Text A, paragraph 1).
- Low productivity and
limited access to technology in agriculture,
if neglected may lead to unsustainable practices or external costs of production
(Text B, paragraph 1).
Students may discuss that economic growth may have
little or no impact because of policies/practices in place to protect sustainability
including:
- Use of renewable
resources (Text C -paragraph 1)
- Ability to obtain finance and technology for climate- related projects (Text C, paragraph 4)
- Revenue from tradeable permits (Text C, para 2)
- Reforestation programmes
(Text C, paragraph 2)
- World Bank programme aimed at green energy
(Text A, paragraph 4)
- Use of carbon taxes as suggested by IMF (Text C,
- Hustler fund - promoting education (Text B, paragraph 2)
- Growth of Green goods (Text C, paragraph 2).
- Potential increases in tourism may encourage sustainability as tourists
make environmental
choices (Text A, paragraph 1 and paragraph 5).
- The growth of tourism (e.g. safaris) may damage the environment and culture (Text A, paragraph 1 and paragraph 5)
- Climate change could be from increased production (Text A, paragraph 1).
- Growth is allowing education levels to
improve → possibly more
consciousness about the environment (Text B, paragraph 2).
- Sale of SOEs/privatization
may mean that firms are
less concerned about possible environmental
damage (Text A, paragraph 4).
- Growth allowed for the government to help fund the (although partly funded by aid) Hustler fund may be used for small-scale, environmentally friendly
investments (e.g. solar power in villages) (Text B, paragraph 2).
- Growth through export revenues from primary goods is volatile due to
low PED and supply shocks → possibly more environmentally damaging agricultural practices
(Text A, paragraph 5).
- Growth may have allowed for 90% of electricity (100% by 2030) to be generated by renewables → fewer externalities (Text C, paragraph 1).
- Growth from export production does not use resources sustainably enough to meet EU standards (Text C, paragraph 2).
- Economic growth has
allowed for "green
markets" to expand and
reforestation is improving the environment and may enable Kenya to sell tradable permits (Text C, paragraph 2).
- Urbanization from rapid growth results in using fossil fuels too much for transport, which is growing. Needs more efficiency (Text C, paragraph 3).
- Economic growth has seen rapid urbanization and is encouraging more
- Growth leading to rapid urbanization → possibly
more pollution (Text C,
use of electric vehicles and use of public transport. Kenya is
incentivized to use energy
more efficiently etc, because fossil fuels are
imported (Text C, paragraph 3).
paragraph 3) and population growing fast →
more strain on resources
(Table 3).
- Economic growth is attracting climate-related projects. Foreign aid and public-private partnerships will help to promote sustainable growth (Text A, paragraph 4, Text C, paragraph 4).
- Economic growth causing sustainability issues may
lead to carbon taxes needed because the environment is being
damaged (Text C, paragraph 3).
- High tax revenue from economic growth could
Marking guidance: