IB Economics SL 3.7 Supply Side Policies Questions
Explain how supply-side policies affect productive capacity, productivity, employment, growth, inflation and equity.
- Syllabus
- First assessment 2022
- Course
- Economics SL
- Level
- SL
Explain how supply-side policies affect productive capacity, productivity, employment, growth, inflation and equity.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Text A - Overview of Uruguay
(1) With a population of only 3.5 million, Uruguay is one of the smallest nations in South America. Its membership of the MERCOSUR common market allows Uruguayan producers tariff-free access to 290 million consumers in Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay.
(2) Agriculture accounts for 8 % of Uruguay's gross domestic product (GDP) and 65 % of its export revenue. Exports have increased since the early 2000s, partly due to China's rising demand for commodities. In particular, Uruguay's soybean producers benefitted from significantly higher prices during the commodity boom. China is now Uruguay's most important export destination, with soybeans accounting for over 50 % of its exports to China.
(3) Uruguay's real GDP increased by an average of 5.39 % per year from 2005 to 2014. However, the economy slowed considerably when the commodity boom ended in 2015. It slowed further because of decreased regional demand when the largest members of MERCOSUR, Argentina and Brazil, faced a recession in 2017. Uruguay's real GDP grew on average by 1.04 % per year from 2015 to 2018.
(4) With the increasing importance of China and the European Union (EU) as export markets, Uruguay has managed to reduce its dependency on MERCOSUR. However, attempts to diversify its exports away from agriculture have not been successful. The end of the commodity boom contributed to a fall in export revenue and the depreciation of the peso (Uruguay's currency). The currency has lost over 25% of its value since 2015.
(5) Inflation stayed at a relatively high rate of 8 % in 2018 due to the weaker currency. The unemployment rate also increased to 7.9 % as a result of the economic slowdown. The higher cost of living and the lower rates of employment could inhibit efforts to reduce inequality and poverty levels.
(6) Despite rising inflation and unemployment, Uruguay's minimal corruption, abundant natural resources and access to a large common market continue to attract foreign direct investment (FDI). Investments in the paper and wood industries have made forestry one of the country's fastest growing industries. Increased FDI inflows have also prevented the peso from depreciating further.
Text B - The EU-MERCOSUR free trade agreement
(1) The EU and MERCOSUR are finalizing the terms of a free trade agreement, which would enable Uruguay to increase its exports to the 27 EU member states. The EU currently buys 11 % of all Uruguayan exports, mostly animal products, paper, vegetables and wood.
(2) Once the free trade agreement comes into effect, almost all agricultural and industrial tariffs between the EU and MERCOSUR will be removed. The imports of beef, poultry and sugar will not be included in the list of tariff-free products but will be subject to very large quotas. This will allow increased exports of these products to EU countries.
(3) The free trade agreement may cause bankruptcies in the manufacturing sector and higher structural unemployment in Uruguay. EU exports to Uruguay largely consist of manufactured goods, such as chemicals, machinery, transport equipment and plastics, which are in high demand despite the current tariffs of up to 35 %.
(4) One third of FDI into Uruguay comes from the EU. Anticipation of the free trade agreement has led to more EU investments in Uruguay's forestry sector. Environmental organizations have warned that the free trade agreement could be a threat to sustainability as South American forests are cleared to create land for cattle farming, paper and wood production. The deforestation might also disrupt water sources that supply rural villages, depriving the villagers of clean water.
Text C — Uruguay seeks trade agreements outside MERCOSUR
(1) Members of MERCOSUR have differing views on trade policies. Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay believe in trade liberalization and want to increase competition through a reduction of the common external tariff. On the other hand, Argentina wants to maintain the high external tariff to protect industries from cheap imports from China and to avoid prolonging its current recession.
(2) Uruguay has expressed its desire to seek trade agreements apart from MERCOSUR, which is prohibited by the common market's rules. If Uruguay pursues separate bilateral agreements, it is likely to lose its MERCOSUR membership and the benefits of any existing free trade agreement.
Table 1: Current account data for Uruguay (US\$ billion)
Table 2: Selected income data for Uruguay
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain the likely impact of the reduction of the common external tariff on Uruguay's potential (long-term) output (Text C, paragraph 1).
Level 0 (0 marks): The work does not meet a standard described by the descriptors below.
Level 1 (1-2 marks): There is a correct diagram OR an accurate written response. For an AD/AS diagram with a LRAS (no AD or SRAS required) shifting to the right and an increase in potential (long-term) output O R for explaining that reducing the common external tariff would increase efficiency (productivity) by increasing competition (between firms) (and/or increase the quantity/quality of resources) and hence lead to an increase in potential (longterm) output (or LRAS).
Level 2 (3-4 marks): There is a correct diagram AND an accurate written response. For an AD/AS diagram with a LRAS (no AD or SRAS required) shifting to the right and an increase in potential (long-term) output AND for explaining that reducing the common external tariff would increase efficiency (productivity) by increasing competition (between firms) (and/or increase the quantity/quality of resources) and hence lead to an increase in potential (longterm) output (or LRAS).
Candidates who label diagrams incorrectly can be awarded a maximum of [3].
For AD/AS, the vertical axis may be Average (General) Price Level, or Price Level. The horizontal axis may be real output, real national output, real income, real national income, real GDP or real Y. Any abbreviation of the previous terms is acceptable. Alternatively, a Keynesian AS may be drawn with the vertical portion shifting to the right. A title is not necessary.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Text A — Overview of North Macedonia
(1) North Macedonia is a small, landlocked nation that shares borders with five countries, including Bulgaria and Greece. Bulgaria and Greece are members of the European Union (EU) common market, which North Macedonia hopes to join soon. Since the country began negotiating for EU membership, trade with the EU has increased rapidly and now accounts for 75 % of North Macedonia's exports and 62 % of its imports.
(2) Despite its small market, with a population of approximately 2 million, North Macedonia's proximity to the EU, low wages and expected entry into the common market have attracted foreign investors. Greece, its richest neighbour, was its third highest source of foreign investment in 2019. The lower cost of living also appeals to Greek tourists.
(3) EU companies have invested in the financial, telecommunication, energy and food processing industries in North Macedonia. Many of the most profitable companies are from the EU. If EU membership is granted, foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows may increase as firms located in North Macedonia will be allowed to bypass all custom checks and enjoy tariff-free trade within the common market. One particular challenge for North Macedonia, however, is that most of the profits of foreign companies are likely to be repatriated (sent back to the companies' home countries).
(4) In 2018, North Macedonia's export revenue was US $7.57 billion and its import expenditure was US$9.56 billion. The country's main exports are iron and steel, clothing and accessories, and food products. Food, livestock and consumer goods account for 33 % of imports while the remainder are machinery, petroleum and other materials needed for the industrial production process.
(5) The manufacturing sector, which now employs 31 % of the labour force, has gained more importance. The agricultural sector remains strong, contributes over 10 % of North Macedonia's gross domestic product (GDP) and employs about 16 % of the country's workforce.
(6) The unemployment rate decreased from over 30 % in 2010 to 17.3 % in 2019. However, youth unemployment is almost 40 %. Over 20 % of the population lives below the poverty line. Unemployment and poverty contribute to high rates of emigration. More than 20 % of the North Macedonian population have emigrated since 1994, mostly to the EU. As a member of the EU, North Macedonia will enjoy free movement of labour which will make it easy for its citizens to live and work in other EU countries.
Text B - North Macedonia's economic reforms
(1) To be considered for EU membership, North Macedonia implemented a series of supply-side policies to reform its economy. The EU imposes strict requirements for membership but provides financial assistance to countries preparing for membership. North Macedonia has received 633 million euros (the currency of the EU) to help with the reforms.
(2) Most of the supply-side policies seek to improve the international competitiveness of North Macedonia's industries. The authorities are increasing access to education and training for workers. The expansion of the transport network and other infrastructure is also expected to increase efficiency.
(3) Protection of the environment is also on the list of requirements for EU membership. North Macedonia aims to reduce its dependence on coal and to instead promote the use of solar, wind and hydropower technologies. These low-carbon energy sources would help decrease its air pollution, which is among the worst in Europe.
(4) The reforms, which started in 2014, have shown progress. Exports and manufacturing output are more diversified and more concentrated on high-value products. To attract FDI, North Macedonia maintains one of the lowest tax rates on corporate income in the region. The central bank also prevents the denar (North Macedonia's currency) from appreciating against the euro through managing foreign reserves. However, skill shortages and a mismatch of skills with those required by companies discourage foreign firms from investing. Important investment gaps in public infrastructure also remain.
Text C - North Macedonia's trade agreements
North Macedonia participates in five free trade agreements (FTAs), that together cover 95 % of its exports and 78 % of its imports. Most of its trade with the EU is already free but imports of wine, beef and fish products are still subject to quotas. North Macedonia is currently a net importer of agricultural and food products. All protectionist measures on EU products would be removed upon entry into the common market.
Table 1: Consumer Price Index (CPI) for North Macedonia (base year = 2010)
Table 2: Economic data for North Macedonia
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain the likely impact of North Macedonia's supply-side policies on its full employment level of output (Text B, paragraph 2).
Level
Marks
0
The work does not meet a standard described by the descriptors below.
1
There is a correct diagram OR an accurate written response.
1-2
For an AD/AS diagram with a LRAS (no AD or SRAS required) shifting to the right and an increase in full employment level of output OR for explaining that North Macedonia's supply-side policies would lead to an increase in efficiency (productivity) and/or increase in the quantity/quality of resources/factors of production. This would lead to an increase in full employment level of output (potential output).
2
There is a correct diagram AND an accurate written response.
3-4
For an AD/AS diagram with a LRAS (no AD or SRAS required) shifting to the right and an increase in full employment level of output AND for explaining that North Macedonia's supply-side policies would lead to an increase in efficiency (productivity) and/or increase in the quantity/quality of resources/factors of production. This would lead to an increase in full employment level of output (potential output).
Candidates who label diagrams incorrectly can be awarded a maximum of [3].
For AD/AS, the vertical axis may be Average (General) Price Level, or Price Level. The horizontal axis may be real output, real national output, real income, real national income, real GDP or real Y. Any abbreviation of the previous terms is acceptable. A Keynesian AS is acceptable. A title is not necessary.
Explain how increased investment by the government in education and training can affect both aggregate demand and aggregate supply.
Answers may include:
- definition of investment, aggregate demand, aggregate supply
- diagrams to show aggregate demand (AD) shifting right and LRAS shifting right
- explanation of how increased investment by the government in education and training can increase AD in the short term by increasing the G component of C+I+G+X-M and increase LRAS in the long term as labour productivity increases
- examples of countries in which the government has increased investment in education and training.
Assessment Criteria
Part (a) 10 marks
Level 0 (0 marks): The work does not meet a standard described by the descriptors below.
Level 1 (1-3 marks): There is little understanding of the specific demands of the question. Relevant economic terms are not defined. There is very little knowledge of relevant economic theory. There are significant errors.
Level 2 (4-6 marks): There is some understanding of the specific demands of the question. Some relevant economic terms are defined. There is some knowledge of relevant economic theory. There are some errors.
Level 3 (7-8 marks): There is understanding of the specific demands of the question. Relevant economic terms are defined. Relevant economic theory is explained and applied. Where appropriate, diagrams are included and applied. Where appropriate, examples are used. There are few errors.
Level 4 (9-10 marks): There is clear understanding of the specific demands of the question. Relevant economic terms are clearly defined. Relevant economic theory is clearly explained and applied. Where appropriate, diagrams are included and applied effectively. Where appropriate, examples are used effectively. There are no significant errors.
Evaluate the view that inflationary pressures in an economy are best reduced using supply-side policies.
Answers may include:
- definition of inflation, inflationary pressures, supply-side policies
- diagram to show the impact of supply-side policies on inflation via the shift of long-run aggregate supply (LRAS) to the right
- explanation of how market based (eg deregulation, anti-monopoly policy, etc) and/or interventionist supply-side policies (eg price controls, subsidies, etc) may reduce inflationary pressures in an economy
- examples of situations where supply-side policies have helped to reduce inflationary pressures
- synthesis and evaluation.
Evaluation may include: the disadvantages of using particular supply-side policies, such as: the impact of market-based polices on equity, not as effective with demand-pull inflation, the impact of interventionist policies on the government budget and the time lags associated with supply-side policies. The advantages of supply-side policies, such as: increased real GDP, increased employment, more effective with cost-push inflation and possible improvement in economic efficiency. Consideration of deflationary monetary and fiscal policies as alternative policies to reduce inflation.
Assessment Criteria
Level 0 (0 marks): The work does not meet a standard described by the descriptors below.
Level 1 (1-5 marks): There is little understanding of the specific demands of the question. Relevant economic terms are not defined. There is very little knowledge of relevant economic theory. There are significant errors.
Level 2 (6-9 marks): There is some understanding of the specific demands of the question. Some relevant economic terms are defined. There is some knowledge of relevant economic theory. There are some errors.
Level 3 (10-12 marks): There is understanding of the specific demands of the question. Relevant economic terms are defined. Relevant economic theory is explained and applied. Where appropriate, diagrams are included and applied. Where appropriate, examples are used. There is an attempt at synthesis or evaluation. There are few errors.
Level 4 (13-15 marks): There is clear understanding of the specific demands of the question. Relevant economic terms are clearly defined. Relevant economic theory is clearly explained and applied. Where appropriate, diagrams are included and applied effectively. Where appropriate, examples are used effectively. There is evidence of appropriate synthesis or evaluation. There are no significant errors.
Explain how increased investment by the government in education and training can affect both aggregate demand and aggregate supply.
Answers may include:
- definition of investment, aggregate demand, aggregate supply
- diagrams to show aggregate demand (AD) shifting right and LRAS shifting right
- explanation of how increased investment by the government in education and training can increase AD in the short term by increasing the G component of C+I+G+X-M and increase LRAS in the long term as labour productivity increases
- examples of countries in which the government has increased investment in education and training.
Assessment Criteria
Part (a) 10 marks
Level 0 (0 marks): The work does not meet a standard described by the descriptors below.
Level 1 (1-3 marks): There is little understanding of the specific demands of the question. Relevant economic terms are not defined. There is very little knowledge of relevant economic theory. There are significant errors.
Level 2 (4-6 marks): There is some understanding of the specific demands of the question. Some relevant economic terms are defined. There is some knowledge of relevant economic theory. There are some errors.
Level 3 (7-8 marks): There is understanding of the specific demands of the question. Relevant economic terms are defined. Relevant economic theory is explained and applied. Where appropriate, diagrams are included and applied. Where appropriate, examples are used. There are few errors.
Level 4 (9-10 marks): There is clear understanding of the specific demands of the question. Relevant economic terms are clearly defined. Relevant economic theory is clearly explained and applied. Where appropriate, diagrams are included and applied effectively. Where appropriate, examples are used effectively. There are no significant errors.
Read the extracts and answer the questions that follow.
Text D - Macroeconomic policies in Uruguay
(1) Compared to many other Latin American countries, Uruguay has a high Human Development Index (HDI). This is due to its higher gross national income (GNI) per capita and wider access to health care and education.
(2) One aim of Uruguay's fiscal policy has been income redistribution. For example, in 2017 the tax rate applied to the highest income bracket was raised from 25 % to 36 %. Spending on social programmes, which are targeted towards the poor, has also increased. However, while expenditure on schools is benefitting all families, expenditure on higher education still tends to favour higher-income families, because there are relatively few students from low-income families in universities.
(3) Recently, concern about a growing budget deficit has led to new budget guidelines being implemented. These guidelines aim to reduce borrowing and the national debt by encouraging the government to increase tax revenue and/or reduce expenditures. The main policy goal of Uruguay's central bank is to keep a low rate of inflation. It has announced that it will reduce the inflation target to below 6% by September 2022.
(4) Several constraints to growth remain, which may limit progress towards sustainable development. Despite plans to upgrade road networks and construct a new central railway, investment in infrastructure needs to be increased further. Education and training could also be improved to meet the needs of new sectors, such as the information and communication technology (ICT) industry.
(5) State-owned enterprises, including railways and suppliers of fuel, water and electricity, are a significant part of the Uruguayan economy. The prices charged by these enterprises tend to be high relative to prices in other countries. As part of a strategy to eliminate excessive costs, the government has proposed measures to improve efficiency in state-owned enterprises and to gradually reduce prices.
(6) The International Monetary Fund (IMF) considers that more labour market flexibility is needed to make it easier for workers to change jobs and for firms in growing sectors such as ICT to hire workers. The government is, therefore, considering deregulation of the labour market.
(7) Overall, by boosting competitiveness and private investment through supply-side policies, the government aims to raise growth and employment.
Text E - Health care system in Uruguay
The public and private sectors that offer health care in Uruguay were combined into one system in 2007, with both overseen by the government and both eligible to receive subsidies. Most medical care is free for low-income patients. The first row of data in Table 3 shows that per capita demand for health care increased by 54.22 % from 2010 to 2018 . The advantages are seen in longer life expectancy figures, which imply an increase in productivity, and other benefits.
Table 3: Health care expenditure and GNI per capita for Uruguay
Text F - Trade and exchange rates
(1) Over 50 % of Uruguayan exports are forestry and agricultural goods, including soybeans, rice, and cattle meat. Increasing global demand and a significant rise in commodity prices from 2000 to 2012 encouraged investment in the agricultural sector. However, the price of soybeans has been declining since 2013, partly due to rising productivity in agriculture. Climate-related shocks, such as droughts in 2017 and 2020, and economic crises in the major export markets of Brazil and Argentina have also caused difficulties for producers.
(2) Therefore, Uruguay aims to diversify its export markets. For example, with the growth of the ICT sector, Montevideo (the capital city of Uruguay) has become a leading software development centre. In addition, Uruguay is broadening its markets towards Europe and Asia. Under a proposed trade agreement between the European Union (EU) and the South American trade bloc, Mercosur (Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Venezuela, and Uruguay), 93 % of all tariffs will gradually be eliminated. However, a quota will be imposed on cheese imports from the EU.
(3) To help the economy adjust to external shocks and to avoid large fluctuations in the exchange rate of the peso (Uruguay's currency), the central bank uses its plentiful reserve assets of foreign currencies. In 2019, the decline in agricultural export revenues put downward pressure on the peso exchange rate. However, the central bank was able to prevent a large depreciation by using its reserve assets in the foreign exchange market.
Table 4: Economic data for Uruguay
Table 5: Development data for Uruguay
Table 6: Balance of payments data for Uruguay in 2019
Using information from the text/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate the effectiveness of the government's macroeconomic policies in achieving economic growth and economic development in Uruguay.
Examiners should be aware that candidates may take a different approach which, if appropriate, should be rewarded.
Marks
Level descriptor
0
- The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1-3
- The response indicates little understanding of the specific demands of the question.
- Economic theory is stated but it is not relevant.
- Economic terms are stated but they are not relevant.
- The response contains no evidence of synthesis or evaluation.
- The response contains no use of text/data.
4-6
- The response indicates some understanding of the specific demands of the question.
- Relevant economic theory is described.
- Some relevant economic terms are included.
- The response contains evidence of superficial synthesis or evaluation.
- The response contains limited use of text/data.
7-9
- The response indicates understanding of the specific demands of the question, but these demands are only partially addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is partly explained.
- Some relevant economic terms are used appropriately.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included.
- The response contains evidence of appropriate synthesis or evaluation but lacks balance.
- The response includes some relevant information from the text/data.
10-12
- The specific demands of the question are understood and addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is explained.
- Relevant economic terms are used appropriately.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included and explained.
- The response contains evidence of appropriate synthesis or evaluation that is mostly balanced.
- The use of information from the text/data is generally appropriate, relevant, and applied correctly.
13-15
- The specific demands of the question are understood and addressed.
- Relevant economic theory is fully explained.
- Relevant economic terms are used appropriately throughout the response.
- Where appropriate, relevant diagram(s) are included and fully explained.
- The response contains evidence of effective and balanced synthesis or evaluation.
- The use of information from the text/data is appropriate, relevant, and is used to formulate a reasoned argument supported by analysis/evaluation.
A maximum of [9] should be awarded if only economic growth or only economic development is discussed.
Command term
"Evaluate" requires candidates to make an appraisal by weighing up the strengths and limitations. Opinions and conclusions should be presented clearly and supported with appropriate evidence and sound argument.
Answers may include:
- Definition of development
- Definition of growth
- An explanation of the links between growth and development
- Definition of supply-side policies
- Definition of fiscal policy
- Definition of monetary policy
- Diagram(s) (e.g. AD/AS, poverty cycle, PPC...).
Supply-side policies: strengths may include:
- Interventionist supply-side policies can be used to increase spending on infrastructure and on education (Text D, paragraph 4)
- Can increase competition and efficiency in state-owned enterprises (or maybe privatize them) to lower prices (Text D, paragraph 5)
- Can make the labour market more flexible and able to supply labour to new and growing sectors (Text D, paragraph 6)
- Can attract more FDI (Text D, paragraph 7)
- By promoting certain sectors, can diversify exports (Text F, paragraph 2)
- Surplus on trade balance has increased significantly maybe due to supply-side policies (Table 4)
Supply-side policies: limitations may include:
- Market-based policies (such as the abolition of the minimum wage and reductions in unemployment benefits) may increase inequality and poverty if labour market is deregulated (Text D, paragraph 6)
- Time lags before they are effective
- May damage the environment
Fiscal policies: strengths may include:
- Used to redistribute income by progressive taxes and transfer payments which promote equality, lowering the Gini coefficient (Text D, paragraph 2;
Table 5)
- Used to subsidise education and health care which has raised the HDI (Text D, paragraph 1;
Text E, Table 5)
Fiscal policies: limitations may include:
- Growth rate has fallen and unemployment has risen (despite growing budget deficits) (Table 4)
- Budget deficits mean that government has had to borrow funds, which raises debt (Text D, paragraph 3)
- New budget guidelines require the government to raise taxes and/or reduce spending which will have a negative impact on growth (Text D, paragraph 3)
- Some of the spending (for example on higher education) has benefitted the rich more than the poor (Text D, paragraph 2)
Synthesis: limited effectiveness on growth but can be targeted at development.
Monetary policies: strengths may include:
- Have kept inflation at a reasonably low level (Table 4)
- Have been able to set a target rate of inflation and plans to lower it (Text D, paragraph 3)
- Have been able to lower interest rates which should expand AD through increased investment/consumption (Table 4)
Monetary policies: limitations may include:
- The reduction in interest rates so far does not seem to have expanded growth, implying limited effects on investment (Table 4)
- Further reductions in interest rates, if expansionary policies are needed, will become more difficult as interest rates are now already relatively low (Table 4).
Trade policies: strengths may include:
- Increase in exports due to greater diversification (Text F. paragraph 2)
- Increase in exports due to greater market access based EU/Mercosur tariff reduction agreement (Text F, paragraph 2)
- Cheaper imports due to lower tariffs will reduce consumer prices (maybe aiding the poor) (Text F, paragraph 2)
- Central Bank exchange rate policies aimed at appreciation will make importing capital goods/technology cheaper (Text F, paragraph 3\}
- Rising surplus on balance of trade will add to growth through increasing AD (Table 4)
Trade policies: limitations may include:
- Increase in imports due to EU/Mercosur tariff reduction agreement, which could harm development in rural areas (Text F, paragraph 2)
- Central Bank exchange rate policies aimed at appreciation could harm export competitiveness (Text F, paragraph 3\}
- Over-reliance on the export of agricultural goods may lead to unpredictable growth outcomes (Text F, paragraph 1)