2.3.6 (HL)—Equilibrium calculations
- Syllabus
- First assessment 2025
- Objective
- 2.3.6
- Level
- HL
Write the balanced reaction, record initial concentrations, express changes as coefficient multiples of x, and substitute the equilibrium row into Kc. Use a small-K approximation when justified; quadratic equations are not expected here.
Equilibrium reactions do not use the limiting-reactant idea: both directions remain possible, so calculate the equilibrium composition instead.
After using an approximation such as C₀ − x ≈ C₀, validate it by checking that x/C₀ is small, commonly below 5% for the stated course method. If the check fails, the approximation is not justified; revise the setup rather than treating equilibrium as a limiting-reactant completion.
Worked equilibrium example: for 2SOX2(g)+OX2(g)2SOX3(g), K=3.0, [SOX2]eq=0.12 and [SOX3]eq=0.18moldm−3. From 3.0=(0.18)2/[x(0.12)2], x=[OX2]eq=0.75moldm−3. Forming 0.18moldm−3 of SOX3 consumes 0.18 of SOX2 and 0.090 of OX2, so their initial concentrations were 0.30 and 0.84moldm−3, respectively.
Representative question
The equilibrium constant, Kc, for the reaction
was found to be 10.0 at 420∘C.
1.00 mol of CO(g) and 1.00 mol of H2O(g) are mixed in a 1.00dm3 container at 420∘C. Calculate the equilibrium concentration of each component in the mixture, showing your working.
CO(g)+H2O(g)⇌H2( g)+CO2( g)(1.00−x)(1.00−x)xxKc=10.0=(1.00−x)2x2/10.0=(1.00−x)x;
x=0.760 /(1.00-x)=0.240;
[CO]=0.240(moldm−3) and [H2O]=0.240(moldm−3) and [H2]=0.760(moldm−3)
and [CO2]=0.760( moldm−3);
Retrieve the route: define dynamic equilibrium, write K, interpret its magnitude, predict Le Châtelier shifts, compare Q with K, solve a RICE table, and connect K with ΔG.
Check closed-system and equal-rate language, exponents and direction, whether a change affects K, current versus equilibrium concentrations, stoichiometric x changes, and kelvin/unit consistency in ΔG calculations.