Accept other relevant options.
Candidates should discuss at least one of the options above in some depth or discuss two in lesser depth. To receive more than [3], candidates must show balance. In this context, balance means the strengths and limitations of the approach adopted.
Though, in practice, most global companies are going to rely on some combination of all of the approaches, some companies try very hard to be known in the market for certain types of human resources.
- For most of its history NationsBank (now Bank of America) was famous for recruiting internally for mid-level and senior positions. As a result, many talented people wanted to work there because they knew they would have opportunities to be promoted, gain more responsibility, and make more money. A drawback to this approach is that sometimes promoted employees could not perform in their new roles, whereas an externally recruited senior person might have fared better.
- Qatar Airways very consciously recruits externally and globally. The airline is trying to be a global company, and wants its employees to be from around the world. A drawback to this approach is that it is expensive, many problems of language and communication can occur, and diverse workforces sometimes can have conflicts based upon cultural differences.
- Very large companies with huge workforces, like ExxonMobil, Walmart, and large auto manufacturers often forecast demand for future employees using all of the techniques noted above. Because they have such huge numbers of employees, statistical modelling and quantitative analysis can work with a high degree of reliability. However, no company can know the future, and all of the methods used for forecasting future employees can fail because of changes in the company's fortunes, unexpected political factors, and changing technologies.
Accept any other relevant analysis.
Marks should be allocated according to the markbands on page 3.