A SWOT analysis has several advantages:
- the acronym is well-known (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats)
- the framework is easy to understand (positive aspects: strengths and opportunities;
negative aspects: weaknesses and threats)
- it is an expected element of the study of any organization
- a key advantage of the model is that it covers both internal and external aspects.
This is good for G P, as it provides a simple and yet comprehensive overview of internal aspects (such as the internal tensions and conflicts around Susan's leadership style, as a weakness) and external ones (such as the increasing competition from other high-quality local hotels, as one of the threats).
A SWOT analysis however has several disadvantages:
- it would only give a snapshot of The Imperial at a particular time (for example, the liquidity problems, as a weakness, are only relevant during certain months of the year)
- it would also need to be revised regularly, following changes in the internal environment (for example, if the quality of the hotel was deteriorating, as a new weakness) or in the external environment (for example, if tourism to Mombasa was suddenly decreasing or stopping, following an outburst of terrorist activity)
- it produces many ideas, but without any sense of priority nor solution or decision
- it is also likely to be based on opinions and therefore subject to bias.
Accept any other relevant advantage and disadvantage with relevant analysis.
N.B. candidates are not asked to do a SWOT analysis. The question is about the advantages and disadvantages of using the model. If an answer only consists of a SWOT analysis, award a maximum of [2 marks].
If an answer is one-sided award a maximum of [5 marks].
If an answer has no context award a maximum of [3 marks].
Marks should be allocated according to the markbands on page 3.