IB Business Management SL Marketing Question Bank
Build your IB Business Management SL Marketing foundation through market evidence, customer decisions and the marketing mix.
- Syllabus
- First assessment 2024
- Course
- Business Management SL
- Level
- SL
Build your IB Business Management SL Marketing foundation through market evidence, customer decisions and the marketing mix.
KapTan
KapTan (K T), which manufactures rechargeable batteries for cordless consumer products like vacuum cleaners, began five years ago as a business with a product orientation. It sells business to business (B2B). Multinational companies dominate the rechargeable battery industry, and K T suffered from cash-flow problems in its first year of trading. Its profits are small and, in the last two years, have fallen.
K T has now developed an innovative battery that is small and lightweight. This battery is an emergency power source allowing electric cars to reach a charging station. However, the battery can only be used ten times before it runs out. K T has insufficient finance to create a battery that can be recharged an unlimited number of times.
Through market research, K T has discovered that:
- no other emergency batteries for electric cars exist
- owners of electric cars fear running out of power
- KT's new battery could be obsolete in five years.
K T has the capacity to produce 90000 of these new batteries each year. The average cost is $200 per unit. KT has insufficient funds to invest in additional capacity.
K T is considering two options:
Option 1: Market and sell directly to existing car owners through business to consumer (B2C) at a retail price of $400. K T will need to borrow significant capital to finance this option.
Option 2: Accept an offer of a five-year strategic alliance with a manufacturer of electric cars. K T would provide its product exclusively at $250 per unit. Sales are guaranteed.

Table 2: \(\boldsymbol{K
Define the term product orientation.
company following a production orientation chooses to ignore their customers' needs and to focus only on efficiently building a quality product. They do not undertake market research identifying customer reactions to their proposed product before commencing production. This type of company believes that if they can make the best product their customers will come.
Candidates are not expected to word their responses exactly as above.
If the candidate says something to the effect of "The company focuses on the product," award [1]. A second mark can be awarded if the candidate then offers a contradistinction such as "ignores the market," "does not do market research," "does not appeal to the market," etc.
Award [1] for identification of one characteristic of a product-orientated business. Award [2] for a full, clear description.
With reference to Option 1, for K T, explain the relationship between the product life cycle, investment, profit and cash flow.
Initial research and development costs plus the costs involved in launching a product usually means a product will be a loss maker in its early years. Cash flows may be negative. As sales grow and the product moves into the growth phase, profits are likely to be positive but the company will require additional working capital Not until the product reaches the maturity phases of the life cycle are cash flows and profits likely to be positive. In the decline phase, cash flows and profits are likely to remain positive. The cash flows especially should be solid with the contraction of necessary working capital. For K T, the investment in R\&D for the new battery will have had a negative effect on cash flow and profits. Once the product is launched, Option 1 forecasts see quite large sales and therefore large cash inflows. However, we do not know about the marketing costs, which will increase cash outflows. Sometime in year 2, further investment would be needed if sales targets in years 3 and 4 are to be fulfilled as projected sales exceed capacity. This investment would increase fixed costs and reduce profits.
If a candidate shows some understanding the relationship between the product life cycle, investment, profit and cash flow, but with no application to the stimulus, award [1].
If the candidate shows clear understanding of the relationship between the product life cycle, investment, profit and cash flow, but with no application to the stimulus, award [2].
If the candidate shows some understanding of the relationship between the product life cycle, investment, profit and cash flow and has some application to the stimulus, award [2].
If the candidate shows clear understanding of the relationship between the product life cycle, investment, profit and cash flow and has some application to the stimulus, award [3].
If the candidate shows clear understanding of the relationship between the product life cycle, investment, profit and cash flow and has detailed application to the stimulus, award [4].
If a candidate writes or draws some sort of table (such as exist in several of the textbooks IB students use) listing the stages of the product life cycle and showing the relationship between stages of the life cycle and their relationship to investment, cash flow and profit, accept and award [2] marks if well executed with no application to the stimulus and award [1] if poorly executed with no application to the stimulus.
If the candidate applies to the stimulus, either by making inserts into the table or with commentary before or after it, award an additional [1 to 2] according to the depth and quality of the application.
Office Supplies (OS)
Office Supplies (OS) is a family-owned private limited company that, for 40 years, has operated three retail office supply stores in a small city. OS offers a wide range of office products (such as computer paper and stationery) and office machinery (such as computers and printers). When each store opened, OS purchased the buildings using long-term loan capital. OS's objective is to have enough profit to finance the company's working capital and pay annual dividends.
OS has no clear marketing strategy. Traditionally, OS competed with several other office supply stores operating in the same city. The market was not competitive, however, and most customers went to the nearest office supply store. OS's prices were comparable to those of other retail office supply stores, and the company did little promotion.
Nationally, the retail office supply store industry is declining. Many retail office supply stores have had to close, and new competitors have entered the market, many of which benefit from some or all of the following:
- Specialization in particular office products
- Economies of scale leading to more competitive prices
- Greater convenience, including e-commerce with door-to-door delivery
Like other physical retail stores, OS has seen its sales decline. Gross and net profit margins have fallen. Last year, to ensure enough funds for capital expenditure and revenue expenditure, OS's board of directors chose not to pay dividends. OS also anticipates the need for additional finance next year. OS's board is considering changes to the company's marketing mix in response to new competitors.
State two marketing objectives that a company might have.
Marketing objectives include
- attract new customers
- enter new market
- improve brand loyalty
- increase awareness
- increase market share
- increase profit
- increase revenue
- increase sales
- retain existing customers
Accept any other valid marketing objective.
Award [1] for each objective identified up to a maximum award of [2].
Discuss possible changes to any two elements of OS's marketing mix.
Ways that O S could modify its marketing mix to match and compete with the new competitors.
- Product: Changing its product range (either contracting or expanding its product range).
- Price: Adopting a different pricing strategy.
- Place: Modifying its distribution strategy to include e-commerce.
- Promotion: Initiate a more aggressive promotion strategy.
For each of the four Ps, OS could make modifications. Modifying each has advantages and disadvantages. For example, contracting its product range could give the organization more focus and require lesser investment in stock. On the other hand, assuming that O S process its products properly, each inventory item makes some contribution to fixed costs. Further, any termination of a product line means that customers for that product, however few, will have to go to a competitor for that product.
OS could modify its prices, particularly try being more aggressive with its pricing. Whereas that may attract more customers (advantage), margins will be thinner.
An ecommerce shift with a door-to-door aspect will change OS′ supply chain considerably. Time and resources will need to be devoted to this task
There is a sense that O S is a traditional business and new aggressive forms of pricing and promotion will be required. Will they know how to do the latter? Do they need to introduce a social media campaign backed up with a membership or loyalty programme?
Candidates are expected to provide a conclusion with a substantiated judgment.
Grade according to the mark bands found on page 3.
For one relevant modification to the marketing mix that is one-sided, award a maximum of [3].
For two relevant modifications, but the discussion of both is one-sided, award a maximum of [4].
For two relevant modifications, one treated in a balanced way and another in an unbalanced way, award a maximum of [5].
For two relevant modifications, both treated in balanced ways, but no real conclusion, award a maximum of [6]. Conclusions must be more than nominal (for example, when a candidate opens a final paragraph with "In conclusion . . ." but then has no real conclusion), award a maximum of [6].
Pablo's Peanuts (PP)
Pablo recently emigrated from Argentina to Miami, Florida, which has a large Hispanic* population. However, he could not find caramelized peanuts - known as garrapiñada -at any of the Latin American markets in Miami. These tasty sweet snacks, sold by street vendors, are very popular in Latin American countries. Pablo began testing different recipes to make the snack himself. Once convinced he had the perfect product, he conducted primary market research in several Hispanic neighbourhoods. He was overwhelmed by the positive response.
As a result, Pablo set up Pablo's Peanuts ( P P ) as a private limited company. He then purchased a food truck (a large vehicle equipped to cook and sell food). From Tuesday to Sunday, he drove to different Latin American markets in the Miami area to cook and sell his product. PP soon became profitable, but meeting demand was difficult.
Pablo wants PP to grow. To do this, he needs a second food truck and an employee. The second truck would require an investment of $100000. Pablo's break-even analysis shows that the expected increased output would more than double PP's profits if the cost of fuel for the food trucks remains constant.
Pablo is considering two options to finance the second truck:
- Option 1: A local Miami bank, clearly impressed by the break-even analysis data, is willing to lend Pablo $100000 with a 10 % interest rate.
- Option 2: A business angel, Ana Perez, with a strong portfolio of Latin American food products, has approached Pablo. She is offering $100000 for 35 % of shares in PP.

Table 4: Financial data related to both options
* Hispanic: relating to Spain or to Spanish-speaking countries, especially those of Central and South America
Explain two reasons why Pablo conducted primary market research.
Reasons include:
- To reduce the risk associated with launching a new product (garrapiñada) to the Latin American markets in Miami Florida.
- To predict future demand for garrapiñada, which appears very important as the market was overwhelmed with positive response.
- Pablo needs up-to-date and relevant data.
- Pablo can further define his target market. Is it only Argentine and Uruguayan consumers?
- Some types of primary market research are inexpensive to conduct, which is important for a start-up.
Award [1] for each relevant reason explained and [1] for appropriate application to PP to a maximum of [2].
Accord's Enrich brand is built around natural ingredients, ethical objectives, corporate social responsibility and customer loyalty, but sales have been below forecasts. New customers are confused about whether Enrich is fruit juice or an energy drink, think its health benefits are exaggerated and consider it too expensive. Enrich averages $3.00 per bottle compared with $2.20 for similar MNC products. The MNCs have stronger brands, larger promotional budgets and economies of scale. Aran favours expanding production to reduce unit costs, while Kayla is concerned about research, positioning and the brand. Kayla's snack-bar proposal uses Enrich flavours and recipes and would require $100000 investment with forecast net returns of $80000 for four years. The healthy snack-bar market is highly competitive, dominated by large companies with substantial advertising budgets, but it is growing by an estimated 34% per year and small businesses have entered successfully on a small scale.
Aran and Kayla decided to launch Detox using batch production. It has now been on the market for six months. Detox is showing strong growth, although sales for the first six months were less than a quarter of Kayla's target of 160000 bottles for the first year. The price of Detox is $2.50 per bottle. The cost of goods sold is $160000and the operating costs before interest and tax are $20000per year.
Enrich sales have not grown much and Aran is very disappointed. Customers, mainly athletes, do not use the product frequently and it is difficult to find new customers. However, research into customer perceptions indicates a very strong brand, resulting largely from Accord's corporate social responsibility (CSR) and strong customer loyalty.
Aran does not like the way the business is organized by product and wants to change it so that it is organized by function instead.
Following the success of Detox, Kayla wants to produce a range of snack bars based on Enrich flavours and recipes. Accord would use the Enrich brand name for the snack bars. The market for healthy snack bars is very competitive and dominated by a few large companies who spend large amounts of money on advertising. The market is growing rapidly - some market researchers estimate by 34 % per annum. There are many examples of small businesses entering the market successfully on a small scale. Kayla estimates the proposal would involve an investment of $100000, with forecast net returns of $80000for four years. Aran thinks that the money could be better spent on marketing Enrich drinks.
Discuss Kayla's plan to produce a range of snack bars.
Arguments for:
- There are problems with Enrich, so maybe diversify.
- Good profits.
- Massive growth (34 \%).
- Returns seem good (candidates may do payback, ARR).
- Small businesses have successfully entered the market.
Arguments against:
- Aran does not like idea.
- Very competitive.
- Dominated by large companies.
- May not match large advertising spending.
- Would be better to spend money advertising Enrich?
Recommendation not needed, but rewardable if supported by analysis.
Accept reasonable alternative answers.
Marks should be allocated according to the mark bands on page 4.
Award a maximum of [4] for a purely theoretical answer, or with no effective use of case (eg, only repeating case material without development).
Award a maximum of [6] if culture change is considered but there is limited use of data, or if there is good analysis of data with limited consideration of culture change.
Award a maximum of [8] if culture changes are considered and there is good use of data but there are no significant judgements.