Martin and Susan had similarities: they were the same age, had similar university educations, and neither fitted perfectly well in Kenyan society. They had, however, an important difference: their leadership style. Susan, though efficient, hard-working and committed, was very task-oriented. She liked bureaucracy, formal accountability, and a clear chain of command. She had a scientific approach to decision-making. Her staff found her cold, official and impersonal. Martin, on the other hand, had a much more laissez-faire style. He believed in empowerment and delegation. Though he felt anxious when he saw there were minor problems that he knew he could fix quickly, he was always careful to let supervisors resolve problems. He was also warm, friendly and outgoing. Susan liked The Imperial very much; however, she still resented the fact that Martin had been appointed manager instead of her. As a result, she wanted others to think that GP had made a mistake in selecting Martin instead of her. She focused harder than ever on her job. She demanded more of the employees and was intolerant of even minor mistakes. The hotel, she was determined, should always be absolutely spotless and shining. However, as she became more demanding, the employees perceived her as too autocratic. They began to complain amongst themselves. The networks of informal communication amongst the employees enabled gossip and messages to move quickly through the hotel, such as stories and anecdotes of Susan acting overly autocratic. Fearing that the situation would soon become a major problem, Martin suggested that she should soften her leadership style. However, in every appraisal meeting, she resisted any discussion about how she managed staff. Martin did not want to dismiss her; he highly regarded her as a valuable member of staff, whose role in the Housekeeping Department was essential. A French travel journalist who had recently stayed at The Imperial had written an article praising the high quality of its housekeeping: “We reach here the top of the highest international standards”, he wrote, “in terms of benchmarking, The Imperial is très magnifique”. Martin fully appreciated the professional importance of Susan. However he believed that, professionally, she needed leadership training. In November 2013, a particular situation brought these tensions to the surface. One employee in the Housekeeping Department, Guthoni, was frequently calling in sick and did not come to work. Rather than enquiring about the reason, Susan dismissed Guthoni for repeated absenteeism. What Susan did not know is that Guthoni had been diagnosed with a terminal illness and required frequent medical treatment. Upon news of her dismissal, the other employees were outraged. They decided to go on strike in December, one of the busiest months of the year for The Imperial. When Martin heard of the planned strike, he was very worried. If it occurred in December, The Imperial would not be able to reach its annual target profits. He started negotiations with employee representatives. He realized that the collective action was giving the employees a sense of solidarity that they previously never displayed. He also noticed that many other frustrations were coming out into the open – and he ironically saw the threat of strike action as empowering for the employees. They seemed to be taking responsibility for the operations of the hotel to a far greater degree than before. Martin wanted to channel their frustrations toward constructive ends. He believed that The Imperial would emerge stronger from the conflict. He knew that he needed the full commitment and support of all the employees because big changes were on the horizon.