1.3.5 - Entrepreneurs and leaders
- Syllabus
- 2017
- Topic
- 1.3.5
- Level
- AS
An entrepreneur is a person who identifies or develops an idea, takes the risk of setting up a business and organises resources to make the offer available. Creation is a sequence of decisions, not only the act of registration.
| Creation task | Entrepreneurial decision |
|---|---|
| identify an opportunity | which customer problem or unmet need is worth addressing? |
| shape the offer | what product or service will create value and how is it different? |
| test demand | what evidence reduces uncertainty before full commitment? |
| assemble resources | which people, finance, premises, suppliers and technology are required? |
| launch | how will customers buy and how will operations deliver reliably? |
The entrepreneur commits time, income or capital before the result is certain. Market research and testing can reduce avoidable risk, but cannot remove it. The role also involves choosing objectives and ownership arrangements within the available resources.
Having an idea alone does not establish entrepreneurship. The entrepreneur acts to create or run the business and accepts consequences; success and profit are possible outcomes, not part of the definition.
After launch, the entrepreneur must keep the business operating while deciding how it should improve, expand or adapt. Running protects current delivery; development builds future capability.
| Running the business | Expanding or developing it |
|---|---|
| manage cash, people, suppliers and customer service | add capacity, products, locations or markets |
| monitor cost, quality and demand | invest in innovation, skills and systems |
| solve immediate operating problems | choose finance and structure for a larger scale |
| preserve reliability and reputation | delegate decisions and manage greater complexity |
Growth can create revenue and scale economies, but it also requires finance, working capital, recruitment and control. The entrepreneur must compare demand evidence and capability with the extra risk, rather than treating expansion as automatic success.
Development need not mean becoming physically larger. Improving a process, product or customer proposition can develop the business, while uncontrolled sales growth can damage cash flow or service.
Intrapreneurship is entrepreneurial behaviour by an employee within an established organisation. The employee identifies and develops an innovation while the business supplies much of the finance, assets, brand and operating platform.
| Feature | Entrepreneur | Intrapreneur |
|---|---|---|
| setting | creates or owns a venture | works inside an existing business |
| resource access | must assemble resources | can use organisational resources and knowledge |
| personal financial risk | usually greater | usually lower, though career and reputation remain at risk |
| value created | new business and offer | innovation or improvement for the employer |
Autonomy, time, recognition and access to decision-makers can turn employee ideas into new products or processes. This may diversify revenue and strengthen competitiveness, while the business retains experienced people who want to innovate.
Innovation is not automatically intrapreneurship. The employee must exercise initiative to develop change inside the organisation; routine implementation of a manager's instruction is different.
A barrier to entrepreneurship is a condition that makes starting a business harder or less likely. Pearson highlights entrepreneurial capacity, access to finance, lack of training or know-how, and fear of failure or low confidence.
| Barrier | How it constrains the start-up | Possible response |
|---|---|---|
| limited capacity | insufficient time, networks or ability to organise resources | partner, prioritise or start at smaller scale |
| access to finance | cannot fund equipment, stock or early cash needs | strengthen evidence, reduce scope or seek suitable finance |
| lack of know-how | weak marketing, finance or operational decisions | training, advice or complementary expertise |
| fear of failure | delays commitment or avoids necessary risk | test assumptions and define affordable downside |
Competition and brand-building cost can intensify these barriers, but the exact constraint depends on the person, idea and market. A partner may supply missing skill while also sharing control and reward.
A barrier is not proof that the idea should proceed or stop. Removing finance or confidence constraints cannot create demand, and passion cannot replace required capability.
Risk exists when possible outcomes and their probabilities can be known, estimated or consciously considered. Uncertainty arises when unexpected external change makes the alternatives or probabilities unreliable.
| Feature | Risk | Uncertainty |
|---|---|---|
| knowledge | outcomes and likelihoods can be estimated | likelihoods or even outcomes are not known reliably |
| response | research, forecast, insure, diversify or limit exposure | build resilience, scenarios, flexibility and contingency |
| entrepreneurial example | investing savings when demand may be lower than forecast | an unforeseen political, health or technology shock |
An entrepreneur identifies what is exposed—income, savings, assets, time or reputation—then tests assumptions and limits a failure's impact. Scenario planning can prepare responses to uncertainty even when it cannot assign a dependable probability.
Risk is not the same as a bad outcome, and planning cannot turn all uncertainty into measurable risk. Higher risk may offer higher potential reward but does not guarantee it.
Characteristics are personal qualities that influence how an entrepreneur responds; skills are learned abilities used to perform tasks. Both can support success, but neither works independently of the idea, resources and market.
| Characteristics | Behaviour supported | Skills | Task enabled |
|---|---|---|---|
| creativity | imagines a different solution | problem-solving | evaluates and resolves obstacles |
| resilience/hard work | persists through setbacks | organisation | coordinates time and resources |
| initiative | acts without waiting for direction | communication/teamwork | persuades and works with stakeholders |
| self-confidence | commits and presents the idea | numeracy/IT | handles data, finance and digital operations |
| risk taking | accepts a considered exposure | research and planning | tests assumptions before commitment |
Evidence should connect the quality or skill to a decision and then to an outcome—for example, creativity produces a differentiated offer only if execution and customer demand support it.
Traits are not fixed guarantees. Resilience can become persistence with a weak idea, confidence can become overconfidence, and missing skills can sometimes be learned or supplied by a team.
An entrepreneurial motive is a reason for setting up a business. Financial motives concern income or profit; non-financial motives concern the way the entrepreneur wants to work or the change they want to create.
| Motive | Meaning |
|---|---|
| profit maximisation | pursue the greatest feasible gap between revenue and total cost |
| profit satisficing | accept enough profit to meet chosen needs while pursuing other aims |
| ethical stance | operate according to moral principles |
| social entrepreneurship | use enterprise to address a social or environmental purpose |
| independence | control decisions and direction |
| home working | gain location or work-life flexibility |
Motives can reinforce or conflict. An ethical proposition may differentiate the business and increase demand, or raise cost and reduce margin. Independence may be valuable but also places responsibility and risk on the owner.
A non-financial motive does not mean profit is irrelevant: a social enterprise needs sufficient revenue and cash to continue. Profit satisficing is a deliberate threshold, not accidental low profit.
Survival is the objective of continuing to operate and meet obligations. It is often the immediate priority for a start-up, a business facing weak demand or a period of cash-flow pressure.
| Survival decision | Why it may help | Possible sacrifice |
|---|---|---|
| conserve cash | preserves ability to pay near-term obligations | delays investment or owner drawings |
| protect core customers | maintains dependable revenue | less attention to expansion |
| control avoidable cost | extends available resources | excessive cuts can weaken quality or capability |
| secure suitable finance | bridges a temporary gap | interest, repayment or shared control |
Survival can take priority over profit maximisation in the short run because a profitable-looking business can fail if cash arrives after payments are due. Once secure, the business may shift towards growth, welfare or social objectives.
Survival is not the same as refusing all risk or making a profit in every period. Continual survival mode can prevent necessary investment, while sales alone do not prove that obligations can be paid.
Profit maximisation is the objective of achieving the greatest feasible profit, not merely earning a positive profit or increasing revenue.
profit=totalrevenue−totalcost
The business can pursue the objective by changing price and volume to raise revenue, improving the mix of products, or reducing costs without damaging the value that sustains demand. Profit can finance replacement, innovation, expansion and returns to owners.
| Evidence | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| price and quantity response | a price rise may reduce sales volume |
| direct and indirect cost | cost cuts may create quality or service loss |
| time horizon | investment can reduce current profit but raise future profit |
| other objectives | social purpose or customer access may justify lower maximum profit |
Revenue maximisation and cost minimisation do not automatically maximise profit. The largest gap may require spending more where that spending creates still greater revenue or future capability.
Beyond survival and profit maximisation, the specification requires six objectives. Each directs attention to a different outcome and can support or conflict with the others.
| Objective | Intended outcome | Important tension |
|---|---|---|
| sales maximisation | sell the greatest feasible volume | high sales can have low margin |
| market share | increase the business's proportion of market sales | price or promotion cost may reduce profit |
| cost efficiency | minimise waste and cost for required output | cuts can damage quality or capability |
| employee welfare | improve employee well-being and conditions | benefits cost money but may aid retention and service |
| customer satisfaction | meet or exceed customer expectations | higher service cost must create value |
| social objectives | benefit society or environment | commitment can raise cost or strengthen differentiation |
Priorities depend on ownership, stage, finances, stakeholder values and market conditions. Objectives may form a chain: welfare can improve service, satisfaction and repeat demand; cost efficiency can fund competitive prices.
Objectives are not labels proven by publicity. Use measurable behaviour and outcomes, and do not assume a social or welfare objective always conflicts with profit.
Opportunity cost is the value of the next-best alternative given up when a choice is made. Scarce time, finance or capacity creates it even when no cash payment occurs.
| Choice made | Possible next-best alternative | Opportunity cost |
|---|---|---|
| owner spends evenings launching | study for a qualification | value of the qualification progress forgone |
| savings fund equipment | safer investment | return and security of that investment |
| factory makes product A | make product B | contribution or objective benefit from B |
Opportunity cost is subjective to the relevant objective and information. It is not always monetary, and it is not the sum of all alternatives or the accounting cost of the chosen option.
A trade-off occurs when two outcomes cannot both be fully achieved with the available resources or conditions. Choosing more of one requires accepting less of another or a different disadvantage.
| Decision | Gain | Sacrifice or pressure |
|---|---|---|
| premium quality materials | differentiation and satisfaction | higher cost or price |
| low penetration price | trial and possible market share | lower contribution per unit |
| ethical sourcing | social impact and reputation | potentially higher input cost |
| employee welfare investment | retention and motivation | short-run expenditure |
| rapid expansion | reach and revenue opportunity | cash, control and service risk |
A real trade-off requires a mechanism. Higher ethical cost may reduce profit if customers will not pay more, but differentiation may raise demand so that both social impact and profit improve. State the conditions and time horizon before deciding severity.
Trade-off does not mean two objectives always conflict or that compromise is exactly equal. Innovation, spare capacity or changed demand can weaken or remove the constraint.