Indicative content guidance
Answers must be credited by using the level descriptors (below) in line with the
general marking guidance. The indicative content below exemplifies some of
the points that candidates may make but this does not imply that any of these
must be included. Other relevant points must also be credited.
Quantitative skills assessed
QS1: calculate, use and understand ratios, averages and fractions
QS2: calculate, use and understand percentages and percentage changes
QS9: interpret, apply and analyse information in written, graphical and
numerical forms.
Knowledge, Application, Analysis, Evaluation - indicative content
- Extract A states that it has 3 main strategies including being the best for
breakfast and to be a global provider of snacks and these figures help to
support these aims
- These results would enable Kellogg's to pursue its strategy of funding
new acquisitions and launching new products outlined in Extract A
- However, these are just for one year and historical data is needed to
look at the long-term development/trends of Kellogg's to see if there
have been any changes or improvements since 2016
- To gain a fuller financial picture, the statement of financial position
would have also been useful to determine Kellogg's liquidity and ROCE
- It would be useful to compare these figures with other rivals, such as
Nestle, to see if they have had a similar financial performance in 2017
- Both qualitative and quantitate information is needed if a true financial
assessment is to be made of Kellogg's in terms of its financial
performance
Level
Mark
Descriptor
0
No rewardable material.
Level 1
1-2
Isolated elements of knowledge and understanding - recall based.
Weak or no relevant application to business examples.
Generic assertions may be presented.
Level 2
3-4
Elements of knowledge and understanding, which are applied to the business example.
Chains of reasoning are presented, but may be assertions or incomplete. A generic or superficial assessment is presented.
Level 3
5-8
Accurate and thorough knowledge and understanding, supported throughout by relevant and effective use of the business behaviour/context.
Analytical perspectives are presented, with developed chains of reasoning, showing cause(s) and/or effect(s).
An attempt at an assessment is presented, using quantitative and/or qualitative information though unlikely to show the significance of competing arguments.
Level 4
9-12
Accurate and thorough knowledge and understanding, supported throughout by relevant and effective use of the business behaviour/context.
A coherent and logical chain of reasoning, showing cause(s) and/or effect(s).
Assessment is balanced, wide ranging and well contextualised, using quantitative and/or qualitative information and shows an awareness of competing arguments/factors leading to a supported judgement.
Question
Number
Indicative content