S1.1 Experimental techniques

Syllabus
First assessment 2025
Topic
S1.1
Level
SL

Address Safety, Ethics and Environment

Move from hazard to control

Identify the specific hazard, who or what could be harmed, and how exposure could occur. Then choose a control that removes the hazard or reduces probability or severity—for example shielding and distance for ionizing radiation, insulation for hot equipment, or containment for pollutants.

Protect self, others and the environment

Check the investigator, nearby people, organisms, equipment and surroundings. After applying controls, state any residual risk and whether the investigation should proceed, be redesigned or not be performed.

Frame an ethical choice

Compare benefits and harms for the affected people. For a medical isotope, balance possible treatment benefit against side effects and the consequence of not treating; do not present a medical choice as risk-free.

Discuss rather than list

A discussion needs more than one perspective or consequence and a reasoned comparison. For environmental questions, consider extraction, use, disposal and long-term effects.

Common trap

Do not write a vague claim such as “it is dangerous.” Name the mechanism and the consequence, then connect it to the decision.

S1.1.1 Exam Analysis

Assessment in practice

1–3 marks
How it is assessed

Questions discuss environmental impacts of technology or outline an ethical implication of a medical treatment choice.

Command terms

Discuss / Outline

What earns marks

Name a specific consequence and explain its relevance; for discuss prompts, cover more than one side rather than listing a generic risk.

Watch for

Giving a generic “dangerous” statement without a mechanism or consequence.

Measure with Suitable Precision

Choose and prepare the instrument

Match range and resolution to the expected value and required precision. Check calibration, zero, units and viewing geometry before measuring mass, time, length, volume, temperature, force, current, potential difference, angle, sound intensity or light intensity.

Variable Suitable instrument or method Precision check
Mass; time Balance; timer or data logger Resolution is small enough for the expected change
Length; volume Ruler/caliper/micrometer; measuring cylinder/burette Avoid parallax and use the correct meniscus/zero
Temperature; force Thermometer/probe; force meter Use a suitable range and allow the reading to stabilize
Current; potential difference Ammeter; voltmeter Connect correctly and select a safe range
Angle; sound/light intensity Protractor; calibrated sensor Align the reference and control position/orientation

Read the value

Record enough digits to reflect the instrument’s resolution and include the unit. For a corrected reading, apply the zero offset with the correct sign; a displayed value is not automatically the true value.

Worked example — signed zero correction

A caliper shows 20.60mm20.60\,\mathrm{mm} around a sphere but reads 0.30mm-0.30\,\mathrm{mm} when closed. True diameter =20.60(0.30)=20.90mm=20.60-(-0.30)=20.90\,\mathrm{mm}. Subtract the zero reading algebraically; do not guess the correction direction.

Improve reliability

Repeat measurements, average them, and measure at different positions or orientations when geometry permits. This reveals random variation and reduces its effect on the mean.

Common trap

Do not increase precision by writing extra decimal places that the instrument cannot resolve, and do not correct a zero error in the wrong direction.

S1.1.2 Exam Analysis

Assessment in practice

1 marks
How it is assessed

Questions calculate a corrected caliper diameter or suggest an improvement using the same instrument.

Command terms

Calculate / State

What earns marks

Subtract the signed zero error correctly, or propose repeated measurements/averaging or measurements across different diameters.

Watch for

Adding rather than subtracting a negative zero error or proposing a new object instead of improving measurements with the same caliper.

Retrieve Experimental Practice

Evaluate responsibly

Name the physical hazard or ethical trade-off and connect it to consequences and benefits.

Measure honestly

Check zero, units and resolution; repeat suitable measurements, average them and report only justified precision.