IB ESS SL 2.4 Climate and Biomes Questions
Interpret climate and biome data, compare environmental evidence and explain how climate change alters ecosystem distribution.
- Syllabus
- First assessment 2026
- Course
- ESS SL
- Level
- SL
Interpret climate and biome data, compare environmental evidence and explain how climate change alters ecosystem distribution.
Figures:Fact file on Hokkaido and Climate graph for Sapporo, Hokkaido
Using the climate graph for Sapporo, state the annual temperature range for Sapporo.
27∘C/ from -4 to (+)23∘C;
Marking guidance:
Accept use of dash to indicate 'to'. Units are not required for credit.
Figure:World map showing location of Japan
Figures:Fact file on Hokkaido and Climate graph for Sapporo, Hokkaido
Figure:Elevation map of Hokkaido
Using Figures: World map showing location of Japan, Climate graph for Sapporo, Hokkaido and Elevation map of Hokkaido, identify one terrestrial biome found on Hokkaido.
temperate forest / (temperate) deciduous forest/ (temperate) coniferous forest / montane forest / boreal forest / taiga / alpine (meadow) / grasslands / wetland;
Marking guidance:
Do not accept only 'forest'.
Only mark the first answer if more than one biome is given.
Define the term biome.
set of similar ecosystems with the same climatic conditions that determine the climax vegetation that can grow there;
OWTTE
Table:Climate data for Norilsk and Novosibirsk within the tundra and taiga biome respectively
Table: Climate data for Norilsk and Novosibirsk within the tundra and taiga biome respectively climate comparison
• Norilsk (tundra): colder annual temperatures and fewer sunshine hours, especially during the growing season.
• Novosibirsk (taiga): warmer temperatures and generally more sunshine hours during the growing season.
• Precipitation is broadly comparable, so temperature and sunshine are the relevant contrasts for primary productivity.
With reference to Table: Climate data for Norilsk and Novosibirsk within the tundra and taiga biome respectively, suggest two reasons why primary productivity is greater in the taiga than in the tundra.
higher temperatures in taiga which contribute to more plant growth/photosynthesis / lower temperatures in tundra which restrict photosynthesis/plant growth;
more sunlight in taiga contributes to more plant growth/photosynthesis/longer growing season / fewer hours of sunlight in tundra which restricts photosynthesis/plant growth/contributes to shorter growing season in tundra;
Marking guidance:
Do not accept only 'more precipitation/higher temperatures/more sunlight in taiga results in greater productivity/biomass'.
Do not accept 'low temperatures in tundra make it more difficult for plants to survive / plants are adapted to warmer conditions'.
Do not accept more sunlight/rainfall increases nutrients for plant productivity.
Do not accept 'growth of organisms/species' instead of 'growth of plants'.