Arguments for being sustainable [4 max]:
a. aiming to reduce CO2/limit CO2 emissions (and therefore meet Paris Agreement/reducing impact of global warming) (environmental sustainability);
b. shift to renewables reduces contamination/release of greenhouse gases (environmental sustainability);
c. use of renewable energy (locally sourced hydro/geothermal/solar/wind) leads to more self-sufficiency/improved energy security;
d. falling birth rates/ageing population/ negative natural increase rate (NIR) will result in a drop in population, reducing electricity demands and therefore increasing sustainability;
e. plan to return forests to natural state which will boost biodiversity and resilience, improving sustainability;
f. red-crowned cranes are fed during the winter to prevent population decline /red
crowned cranes are protected from hunting (environmental sustainability);
g. promotes nature tourism, so people are more likely to support conservation measures to protect habitat and endangered species (environmental sustainability) / income generated from tourism can help to conserve species/habitats / protected areas can be used to educate the public about the importance of conserving species/habitats/biodiversity;
h. conversion of coniferous forest to natural forest/grasslands protects aquatic recharge areas for the future (environmental and social sustainability);
i. all future energy developments require an EIA, which helps avoid environmental degradation;
Arguments that they are not sustainable [4 max]:
j. potential for further nuclear accidents still present, which could contaminate the natural beauty/impact societies (environmental and social sustainability); k. no solution for radioactive waste disposal so not a long-term solution;
I. possible security threat/potential for terrorist attack which could result in a radioactive leak (not sustainable);
m. still heavy reliance on fossil fuels which are finite/produce greenhouse gases, which is unsustainable / nuclear power is not renewable (finite resource) so is not sustainable;
n. large proportion ( 94 % for Japan) of energy is imported which is unsustainable;
o. no evidence that the plan to return monoculture forests to natural forests has occurred, which is unsustainable / proportion of planted monoculture forests is still increasing, leading to soil degradation/loss of biodiversity;
p. 30\% of forests are monoculture plantations, which have reduced biodiversity/genetic diversity/more susceptible to disease;
q. (international) tourism is increasing/large number of tourists, causing damage to ecosystems/species;
r. (large number of) ski resorts/tourists can negatively impact the environment through tourist loading/demand for resources, so sustainability will not be achieved;
s. national parks are not connected, creating isolation of species, which is not sustainable; t. numbers of red-crowned cranes are too large for the habitat/numbers are only robust due to winter feeding stations, resulting in overcrowding and the potential spread of disease, which is unsustainable;
u. red-crowned cranes have changed their natural behaviour as a result of supplemental feeding, making them reliant on this for the future;
v. wetlands are still being drained for agricultural development resulting in loss of habitat;
w. large agricultural production can increase demand for water/increase use of pesticides which can lead to soil toxification/bioaccumulation which is unsustainable;
x. Hokkaido is largest producer of rice (in Japan) which causes methane emissions;
y. indigenous people are a cultural tourism attraction, which impacts social sustainability/their rights may not be protected; z. reduction in birth rates/aging population reduces the future work force (which maintains the economy and therefore) is not economically sustainable;
Marking guidance: