2.4 From models to materials
- Syllabus
- First assessment 2025
- Topic
- 2.4
- Level
- SL
Ionic, covalent, and metallic bonding are models whose contributions can vary across materials. The bonding continuum represents mixed character rather than completely separate categories.
Use the relative contributions of the three bonding types to explain a material's position and its likely properties.
Treat the three bonding models as coordinates rather than sealed boxes. A material may combine electron sharing with partial charge separation, so its properties can fall between idealized categories. Explain which model contribution accounts for each observed property instead of assigning one label and stopping.
Representative question
State the types of bonding in magnesium, oxygen and magnesium oxide, and how the valence electrons produce these types of bonding.
| Substance | Bond type | How the valence electrons produce these bonds |
|---|---|---|
| Magnesium | .......... | □ ________ |
| Oxygen | .......... | ____ □ |
| Magnesium oxide | .......... | ____ |
Substance
Bond type
How the valence electrons produce these bonds
Marking guidance:
Award [1] for all bonding types correct.
Award [1] for each correct description.
Apply ECF for M2 only once.
delocalized «throughout
lattice attracted to
cations»
Accept reference to "sea"/flux of electrons
«attracted to cations»
Oxygen
covalent
shared «between
Magnesium oxide
ionic
transferred «from magnesium to oxygen» OR
lost by magnesium AND gained by oxygen
The bonding triangle is a model for mixed ionic, covalent and metallic character. Its horizontal coordinate uses average electronegativity and its vertical coordinate uses electronegativity difference.
Calculate the two coordinates from the supplied electronegativities, place the substance, then check whether the predicted properties fit the indicated bonding contribution. The triangle is a qualitative model, not a requirement to memorise percentage boundaries.
For NaCl, using χ(Na)=0.9 and χ(Cl)=3.2 gives average χ = (0.9+3.2)/2 = 2.05 and Δχ = 3.2−0.9 = 2.3. The large difference places it near the ionic apex; that placement is consistent with a high-melting lattice and conduction only when ions can move.
Use the coordinates to compare materials rather than treating labels as absolute. A small Δχ can still sit at different average electronegativities, so metallic versus covalent character depends on both axes. Test the interpretation against conductivity, melting behaviour and mechanical response.
Representative question
Deduce, showing your working, the type of bonding and percentage covalent character in calcium bromide, CaBr2. Use sections 9 and 17 of the data booklet.
«electronegativity difference => 2.0 AND «average electronegativity => 2.0
ionic AND 35\% covalent
Marking guidance:
Accept range 30-40\% for percentage
covalent character.
An alloy is a mixture containing a metal and one or more other metals or non-metals. Different-sized atoms disrupt the regular lattice, making layer sliding more difficult while non-directional metallic bonding remains.
Explain an alloy property by referring to composition, lattice disruption, and the restricted movement of layers; do not call the alloy a compound.
In brass, differently sized Cu and Zn atoms disturb regular layer alignment, so dislocations move less easily and the alloy can be harder than pure copper. Material choice still involves trade-offs—an alloy may gain strength while losing ductility or conductivity—and its variable composition confirms that it is a mixture.
Representative question
Explain why metals alloyed with another metal are usually harder and stronger but poorer conductors than the pure metal.
metal ions/atoms have different sizes cations/atoms/layers do not slide over each other as easily «irregularities» obstruct free movement of electrons
Marking guidance:
Accept electrons move less easily/less delocalized for M3.
A polymer is a macromolecule built from repeating monomer-derived units. Chain structure and cross-links influence plastic properties.
| Chain feature | Molecular-motion or packing effect | Typical qualitative consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Long, relatively linear chains | can pack more closely when chain chemistry permits | stronger intermolecular contact and often greater strength/density |
| More branching | can hinder close, regular packing | often lowers packing efficiency and can increase flexibility |
| Few/no cross-links | chains can move past one another more readily on heating | thermoplastic softening and reshaping |
| Dense cross-linking | strongly restricts chain movement | rigid thermoset behaviour; does not simply melt and reshape |
These are conditional structure–property trends: functional groups, chain length and processing history also matter.
Compare chain mobility: weakly interacting, unlinked chains can soften and be reshaped, whereas extensive cross-linking restricts movement and gives thermoset behaviour. A useful structure–property explanation names the repeat-chain feature, the permitted molecular motion and the resulting macroscopic response.
Cellulose is a natural polymer, whereas polyethene is synthetic. Both are macromolecules with repeating units, but origin alone does not determine a plastic's properties or biodegradability: chain structure, functional groups, intermolecular attractions, branching and cross-linking control packing and molecular motion.
Representative question
Contrast the physical properties of polymers with extensive covalently bonded cross-links to polymers which only have a few of these links, giving an example of each.
| Physical properties | Example | |
|---|---|---|
| Extensive covalent cross-links: | ________________ | □ ____________ |
| Few covalent cross-links: | ________ □ | □ |
i
Example
Accept any correct example. eg. billiard balls for thermoset.
Accept "resins" for thermoset.
Accept other valid examples.
Accept "polyester" for either thermoset or thermoplastic for both.
Do not accept same physical property argument for both eg. higher mp for thermoset, lower mp for thermoplastics.
«thermoset»
Bakelite/HDPE/epoxies/
polyurethane
Few covalent
cross-links:
flexible/able to return to shape/can be
recycled
«thermoplastics» rubber/PVC/polystyrene/nylon/ polypropene/polyethene
Addition polymerization forms a chain by opening the monomer C=C bond. The substituents remain attached to the backbone carbons and continuation bonds show the repeating unit extends.
Remove the double bond in the monomer, preserve every substituent, and draw bonds out of the repeating unit at both ends.
Propene forms the repeat unit [–CH₂–CH(CH₃)–]ₙ: open the C=C, keep CH₃ on the same backbone carbon and draw continuation bonds through the brackets. No small molecule is eliminated, so atom accounting should match the monomer exactly.
Representative question
Styrene can undergo polymerization.
Draw the structure of the polymer chain. Show three repeating units and state the type of polymerization that occurs.
Type of polymerization:
correct structure
AND
continuation bonds shown
addition «polymerisation»
Accept either structure for the benzene ring.
Accept phenyl rings on either side of the polymer backbone
Retrieve the pathway: locate bonding contributions, connect them to material properties, distinguish alloy lattice disruption, and construct addition or condensation polymer repeating units from monomer evidence.
Check that the bonding description matches the material, the property explanation names the structural cause, and every polymer substituent, continuation bond, and released small molecule is represented.