Martin and Susan were internal stakeholders with a conflict over Martin’s appointment, Susan’s resentment, her task-oriented and increasingly autocratic management, and Martin’s laissez-faire style, empowerment and delegation. The Imperial’s fixed costs could include the salaries of hotel staff, fixed electricity or internet charges, local property taxes and contracted promotional costs; under Option 2, fixed costs and variable cleaning and maintenance costs would be lower because apartments would be serviced weekly rather than rooms daily. Martin considered three Ansoff choices: Option 1 would renovate and relaunch the existing hotel for similar customers, Option 2 would transform rooms into apartments for business travellers, and Option 3 would form a strategic alliance with KenSafar to reach package-tour customers. Empowerment could give employees authority, responsibility and autonomy, increasing job satisfaction and motivation and encouraging better productivity. Susan was efficient, hard-working and committed but bureaucratic, formal, cold and autocratic; Martin was warm, friendly and laissez-faire, allowing supervisors to resolve problems. Martin’s leadership could support empowerment, while Susan’s task focus could protect housekeeping standards but damage morale.