A4.1.2—Evidence from sequences

Shared molecular systems and sequence comparisons reveal common ancestry, while accumulated DNA, RNA, and protein differences indicate divergence and relatedness.

Syllabus
First assessment 2025
Objective
A4.1.2
Level
SL

Exam analysis

Chance of appearing3%of analysed past papers
Latest appearanceNovember 2024
Most common paperPaper1
Typical marks1

Common command terms

  • Explain
  • Discuss
  • Identify
  • Describe

Scoring notes

Common mistake
Equating sequence similarity with identical whole organisms rather than using it as evidence of recent common ancestry.

Recent exam appearances

November 2024Paper1 ["SL"] · TZ13[ 1 ]A4.1.2—Evidence from sequences
May 2024Paper2 ["SL"] · TZ23(a)(i)[ 1 ]A4.1.2—Evidence from sequences
November 2022Paper1 ["SL"] · TZ024[ 1 ]A4.1.2—Evidence from sequences
May 2018Paper1 ["SL"] · TZ121[ 1 ]A4.1.2—Evidence from sequences
Practice this objective

Coverage 2018–2024 · Updated 15 Jul 2026

Sequences Reveal Common Ancestry

Similarity in DNA or protein sequences can provide evidence that organisms share a common ancestor.

Homologous genes retain inherited sequence features, while substitutions and insertions accumulate after lineages split. The strength of an inference depends on sequence choice, alignment, sampling and the possibility of gene transfer.

Use sequence evidence carefully:

  • compare homologous regions
  • align equivalent positions
  • inspect shared derived changes
  • report uncertainty and alternative histories

A conserved gene with fewer differences between species A and B than between A and C supports a closer relationship between A and B.

Sequence similarity supports ancestry; it does not prove that one modern species descended directly from another.

Evidence from sequences

Assessment in practice

1–4 marks
How it is assessed

This objective is assessed through essay response, commonly using Explain / Discuss / Identify.

Command terms

Explain / Discuss / Identify / Describe

What earns marks

Build the answer around this relationship: The universality of DNA and the genetic code supports common ancestry among living organisms.

Watch for

Equating sequence similarity with identical whole organisms rather than using it as evidence of recent common ancestry.

Representative question

Question 1

[Maximum number: 6]

Discuss how variations in proteins can indicate phylogeny and be used as an evolutionary clock.

SL Transfer: Evidence To Speciation

The core A4.1 answer moves from evidence to mechanism. Define evolution as heritable population change across generations. Use molecular universals and sequence differences, selective breeding, homology, and convergence as evidence for common ancestry and divergence. Then explain speciation as reduced gene flow followed by divergence of isolated gene pools through selection, mutation, and drift.

  • Evolution is cumulative change in heritable characteristics of a population.
  • Molecular evidence supports common ancestry and divergence.
  • Selective breeding shows heritable traits can change rapidly under selection.
  • Homology supports common ancestry; analogy/convergence shows similar selection pressures can mislead.
  • Speciation needs reduced gene flow and divergence of isolated gene pools.

Concept essentials

  • The universality of DNA and the genetic code supports common ancestry among living organisms.
  • Sequence differences accumulate after divergence and can indicate evolutionary distance.
  • Proteins used for comparison must be shared across the organisms being studied.
  • Molecular clocks estimate divergence time from accumulated sequence changes when rates are suitable.