Course review

A3.2 Classification and cladistics [HL only]

Review each learning objective in this topic, then open its concept explanation or question set.

9 Learning objectives0 Mastered0% Topic mastery0 Attempts

Learning objective

A3.2.1 (HL)—Need for classification

New

• Classification organizes biodiversity into groups with shared characteristics • Universal taxonomy supports communication, comparison, and further study • Classification helps reveal functional, structural, and evolutionary relationships

0%
Mastery
0
Attempts
0
Mistakes

Start with the concept explanation, then practise to create mastery evidence.

Learning objective

A3.2.2 (HL)—Difficulties with traditional hierarchy

New

• Traditional hierarchy uses kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species • Fixed ranks can be arbitrary and may not match evolutionary divergence • Morphological similarity can reflect convergence rather than common ancestry

0%
Mastery
0
Attempts
0
Mistakes

Start with the concept explanation, then practise to create mastery evidence.

Learning objective

A3.2.3 (HL)—Advantages of evolutionary classification

New

• Evolutionary classification aims to match phylogeny • Natural groups are monophyletic and include an ancestor plus all descendants • DNA and protein evidence can correct misleading morphology

0%
Mastery
0
Attempts
0
Mistakes

Start with the concept explanation, then practise to create mastery evidence.

Learning objective

A3.2.4 (HL)—Clades

New

• A clade is a group evolved from a common ancestor • Clades are identified using shared derived characteristics, or synapomorphies • Evidence may be anatomical, behavioural, genetic, or protein sequence data

0%
Mastery
0
Attempts
0
Mistakes

Start with the concept explanation, then practise to create mastery evidence.

Learning objective

A3.2.5 (HL)—Molecular clock

New

• Sequence differences accumulate after clades diverge • Molecular clocks estimate divergence time from DNA or amino acid differences • Rates must be calibrated and can vary between genes or lineages

0%
Mastery
0
Attempts
0
Mistakes

Start with the concept explanation, then practise to create mastery evidence.

Learning objective

A3.2.6 (HL)—Constructing cladograms

New

• Cladograms can be built by aligning DNA, RNA, or protein sequences • Computer analysis infers trees that best explain sequence similarities • Parsimony favours the tree requiring the fewest evolutionary changes

0%
Mastery
0
Attempts
0
Mistakes

Start with the concept explanation, then practise to create mastery evidence.

Learning objective

A3.2.7 (HL)—Analysing cladograms

New

• Nodes represent common ancestors or speciation events • Branch points show order of divergence, not simply end-position similarity • Roots, terminal branches, ingroups, outgroups, and sister groups support interpretation

0%
Mastery
0
Attempts
0
Mistakes

Start with the concept explanation, then practise to create mastery evidence.

Learning objective

A3.2.8 (HL)—Testing classification correspondence

New

• Cladistics tests whether traditional taxa match evolutionary relationships • Figwort family reclassification used conserved chloroplast gene sequences • Some morphological similarities were falsified as convergence

0%
Mastery
0
Attempts
0
Mistakes

Start with the concept explanation, then practise to create mastery evidence.

Learning objective

A3.2.9 (HL)—Three domains classification

New

• rRNA sequence evidence separated prokaryotes into eubacteria and archaea • Three domains are Archaea, Eubacteria, and Eukarya • Domains differ in rRNA, chromosomes, histones, introns, cell walls, and membrane lipids

0%
Mastery
0
Attempts
0
Mistakes

Start with the concept explanation, then practise to create mastery evidence.