Indicative content guidance
Answers must be credited by using the level descriptors (below) in line with the general marking guidance. The indicative content below exemplifies some of the points that candidates may make but this does not imply that any of these must be included. Other relevant points must also be credited.
Quantitative skills assessed:
QS9: Interpret, apply and analyse information in written, graphical, tabular and numerical forms
Knowledge, Application, Analysis (8 marks) - indicative content
- Non-price competition involves ways to increase sales and attract custom through methods other than price
- Methods of non-price competition include: product differentiation, advertising and branding, quality, endorsement, product placement, after sales service
- Car manufacturers operate in an oligopolistic market with high levels of interdependence
- Innovation and quality are important to the Chinese consumer
- 79% of consumers plan to purchase a connected-car in the future
- Chinese consumers are highly influenced by reputation of the firm and social media when choosing to purchase a car
- Younger consumers are attracted to cars with a more modern design
- Non-price competition is important as it increases demand and revenue
- Non-price competition can increase the profits for Chinese car manufacturers
- Number of joint-ventures able to offer product differentiation e.g. Alibaba and BMW
Maximum L2 if no reference to car manufacturers
Level
Mark Descriptor
0 No rewardable material.
Level 1
1-3 Displays isolated, superficial or imprecise knowledge and
understanding of economic terms, principles, concepts, theories and
models.
Use of generic material or irrelevant information or inappropriate examples.
Descriptive approach which has no chains of reasoning.
Level 2
4-6
Displays elements of knowledge and understanding of economic terms, principles, concepts, theories and models.
Ability to apply knowledge and understanding to some elements of the question. Some evidence and contextual references are evident in the answer.
Chains of reasoning in terms of cause and/or consequence are evident but they may not be developed fully or some stages are omitted.
Level 3
7-8
Demonstrates accurate and precise knowledge and understanding of economic terms, principles, concepts, theories and models. Ability to link knowledge and understanding in context using relevant examples which are fully integrated to address the broad elements of the question.
Analysis is clear, coherent, relevant and focused. The answer demonstrates logical and multi-stage chains of reasoning in terms of cause and/or consequence.
Evaluation (6 marks) - indicative content
- Some types of non-price competition are likely to be more expensive than others e.g. advertising at prime time on TV may be more expensive than branding
- Some types of non-price competition may be more effective (in increasing demand and making demand less price elastic) than others e.g. connected-cars; high quality may be more effective than branding
- The most significant factor when buying a car for many young Chinese consumers is the environment. Therefore, other forms of non-price competition may not as significant
- Price is the most important factor as new cars are expensive and this is causing their demand to fall
- New car sales have declined in China as consumers seek low-cost alternatives
- There are lots of available substitutes to cars
- Consumers are using car-hailing apps instead of cars as they are more price competitive
- Electric cars are becoming more price competitive as the government is subsidising them and other car manufacturers will need to lower their price to compete.
Level
Mark
Descriptor
0
No rewardable material.
Level 1
1-2
Identification of generic evaluative comments.
No supporting evidence/reference to context.
No evidence of a logical chain of reasoning.
Level 2
3-4
Evidence of evaluation of alternative approaches
Some supporting evidence/reference to context.
Evaluation is supported by a partially-developed chain of reasoning.
Level 3
5-6
Evaluation recognises different viewpoints and/or is critical of the evidence.
Appropriate reference to evidence/context.
Evaluation is supported by a logical chain of reasoning.