2.3.1 - Planning a business AS and raising finance
- Syllabus
- 2017
- Topic
- 2.3.1
- Level
- AS
A business plan is a documented plan for developing a business. It turns an idea into connected assumptions about what the business will offer, how it will operate and whether it may be financially workable.
| Content | Decision it supports |
|---|---|
| product or service and objectives | what the business will offer and aim to achieve |
| target market and marketing approach | who may buy, why, and how they will be reached |
| ownership, management and staffing | who is responsible and which skills are needed |
| operations and resources | which premises, equipment, suppliers and processes are required |
| finance | start-up funding, expected costs and revenue, and cash-flow forecasts |
The sections should agree. A sales forecast affects staffing, inventory, cash needs and finance; inconsistent assumptions reveal a decision that needs more evidence.
Students need to know the content and purpose of a business plan, not memorise a fixed format or produce a complete plan. A plan contains forecasts and assumptions, not guaranteed results.
A business plan is relevant when it helps owners or finance providers judge whether a proposal is credible. Its value comes from the reasoning and evidence behind it, not from the document alone.
| User | Use of the plan | Possible consequence |
|---|---|---|
| owner or manager | test assumptions, identify resource gaps and set milestones | problems can be addressed before full commitment |
| bank | judge repayment ability, cash flow and risk | a sound case may improve access to a loan or its terms |
| investor | compare potential return, risk and ownership offered | the business may give up a smaller share for the finance raised |
| team | coordinate marketing, operations and financial priorities | decisions are more consistent |
The plan can later compare actual performance with forecasts and be revised when costs, demand or circumstances change. Relevance therefore depends on current, realistic evidence and the decision being made.
A polished plan cannot remove business risk or make weak assumptions true. Outdated forecasts, hidden uncertainty or unrealistic sales estimates can mislead both the owner and finance provider.
Owner capital is money supplied by the owner; for a start-up this commonly means personal savings accumulated before the business begins. It is an internal source because the funding comes from the owner rather than an outside finance provider.
| Potential advantage | Linked limitation |
|---|---|
| no interest or scheduled repayment to a lender | the amount is limited by what the owner has saved |
| owner retains decision-making control | the owner carries the financial exposure personally |
| available without a lender's approval | using it has an opportunity cost and may reduce personal security |
| signals commitment to other funders | commitment does not prove the idea will succeed |
Personal savings often suit a sole trader or partnership needing a manageable start-up sum. Suitability depends on the amount required, how much of the owner's savings would remain, and the consequences if the business failed.
Owner capital is not retained profit: personal savings exist before or outside business trading, whereas retained profit is generated by an established profitable business.
Retained profit is profit kept in the business after tax and any distribution to owners, so that it can finance future activity. It is internal finance and is available only when the business has traded profitably and chosen not to distribute all the profit.
| Benefit | Qualification |
|---|---|
| no interest or compulsory repayment | using it reduces funds available for dividends or other projects |
| owners keep control | accumulated profit may be too small for major expansion |
| can be deployed without a new lender or investor | past profit does not guarantee future cash needs are covered |
| may be combined with other finance | retaining too much may disappoint owners seeking a return |
It can suit equipment, expansion or a new outlet when sufficient profit has accumulated and cash is available. An established business may compare its speed and cost with selling assets or arranging external finance.
A start-up cannot use retained profit because it has not yet earned any. Accounting profit also does not automatically mean an equal amount of cash is immediately available.
Sale of assets raises internal finance by converting resources owned by the business into cash. Suitable candidates are assets no longer required for efficient operation, such as spare equipment, vehicles, premises or usable inventory.
| Decision test | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| is the asset genuinely surplus? | losing essential capacity may reduce output or service |
| is there a buyer and realistic resale value? | the amount raised may be less than expected |
| how quickly is cash needed? | finding a buyer can take time |
| is the need temporary or permanent? | a sale produces cash once, not a continuing flow |
| would leasing a replacement be required? | later lease payments can offset the initial benefit |
An established business replacing equipment may sell the old asset and put the proceeds towards the new one. This avoids interest and new ownership, but the opportunity cost is the asset's next-best use.
A start-up normally has no business assets to sell, and an efficiently run business may have few surplus assets. Selling productive capacity to solve a short-term cash problem can weaken future trading.
A source of finance is the person or organisation from which funding comes. This differs from the method: a business angel is a source, while the funding supplied might take the method of venture capital or share capital.
| Source | What can make it suitable | Main caution |
|---|---|---|
| family and friends | trust, small start-up need, flexible terms | unclear repayment or involvement can damage relationships |
| banks | established assessment and potentially substantial funds | approval, interest, security and repayment requirements |
| peer-to-peer funders | access to many lenders through a platform | interest, fees and credit assessment still apply |
| business angels | finance plus experience for a growth venture | investor may expect ownership and influence |
| crowdfunding participants | many small contributions and a test of public interest | campaign effort and uncertain success |
| other businesses | strategic fit, supply relationship or shared benefit | dependence or conflicting objectives |
Suitability depends on amount, purpose, time period, risk, business stage, legal form and how much control the owner will share. A blend may fit better than one source.
A source is not automatically a method and no provider is universally cheapest or easiest. The exact terms offered determine cost, control and risk.
A method of finance describes the arrangement by which funds or assets are provided. The strongest choice matches how long the asset or need will last, when cash returns, the legal form and the owner's tolerance for repayment or shared control.
| Method | Typical fit | Cost or constraint |
|---|---|---|
| loan | substantial, longer-term purchase | interest and scheduled repayment |
| share capital | company growth without compulsory repayment | ownership and control are shared |
| venture capital | higher-risk, high-growth company needing expertise | investor takes equity and influence |
| overdraft | flexible short-term cash gap | interest, limit and possible withdrawal |
| leasing | use of an asset without full purchase cost | repeated payments; no ownership during lease |
| trade credit | short-term purchase from a supplier | payment deadline and supplier confidence |
| grant | project meeting stated eligibility criteria | restricted availability and application conditions |
A long-lived asset may justify a loan or lease; short-lived inventory may suit trade credit or an overdraft. Amount, security, cash-flow reliability and total cost then refine the choice. Several methods can be combined.
Cheap finance is not automatically suitable. Share capital cannot fund a sole trader, a grant is not guaranteed, and permanent long-term needs should not automatically be financed by a withdrawable overdraft.
Sole traders, partnerships and private limited companies organise ownership differently. The best form depends on the number of owners, desired control, risk, continuity and finance needs.
| Feature | Sole trader | Partnership | Private limited company (Ltd) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ownership | one owner | two or more partners | private shareholders |
| control | owner decides | partners share decisions | shareholders own; directors manage |
| liability | normally unlimited | normally unlimited for ordinary partners | shareholders have limited liability |
| capital | owner and borrowing | partners and borrowing | private share capital plus other finance |
| share transfer | not applicable | partnership interest governed by agreement | shares cannot be advertised or sold to the public |
A business may change form as its market, scale, profitability and finance needs grow. More owners can bring capital and expertise, but decision rights and returns must be shared.
A private limited company is not publicly owned merely because it has shares. This Topic compares an ordinary partnership, not a limited liability partnership (LLP), which is outside the required scope.
Franchising, social enterprise, lifestyle business and online business describe different ways to organise or operate enterprise. They are not four mutually exclusive legal ownership forms: an online or social business can also be a company or sole trader.
| Form or model | Core idea | Benefit and limitation |
|---|---|---|
| franchising | franchisor permits a franchisee to trade under its brand for fees | tested brand and support, but less franchisee control and continuing charges |
| social enterprise | trades mainly to pursue social or environmental objectives | purpose can motivate stakeholders, but financial viability remains necessary |
| lifestyle business | supports the owner's chosen income and way of life | flexibility and satisfaction, but growth may not be the priority |
| online business | trades through the internet | broad market reach and potentially lower premises cost, but strong competition, fraud and technical risk |
For a franchisor, expansion can use franchisees' capital and local effort; quality control and support are essential because one outlet can affect the shared brand.
Franchising does not remove risk for either party, a social enterprise is still a business, and operating online does not mean there are no inventory, employee, logistics or technology costs.
Growth to public limited company status allows shares to be offered to and traded by the public. Stock market flotation is the process of bringing shares to a stock exchange, enabling a private company to raise public share capital.
| Potential advantage | Potential disadvantage |
|---|---|
| access to a larger pool of share capital | flotation is costly, time-consuming and administratively demanding |
| finance can support investment and expansion | original owners may lose control as public ownership widens |
| risk and decisions are spread across more shareholders | outsiders may influence objectives or mount a takeover |
| plc status may strengthen profile and borrowing access | disclosure and shareholder expectations increase scrutiny |
| new investors or directors may add expertise | pressure for dividends or short-term performance can constrain choices |
Suitability depends on the scale of finance needed, growth opportunity, existing borrowing options and whether owners value control or established objectives more than rapid expansion.
A successful or large private limited company does not have to float. It can retain private ownership and use retained profit, loans or privately issued shares instead.
Unlimited liability means the owner may be personally responsible for business debts, so personal assets can be at risk. Limited liability means shareholders normally risk only the amount invested in shares because the company has a legal identity separate from its owners.
| Issue | Unlimited liability | Limited liability |
|---|---|---|
| owner exposure | can extend to personal assets | normally limited to investment in shares |
| forms in this Topic | sole trader and ordinary partnership | private and public limited companies |
| possible advantage | simple ownership and direct control may aid trust | protection may encourage investment and considered risk taking |
| possible disadvantage | failure can cause severe personal loss | formation, reporting and administration are more complex |
| creditor position | owner backs obligations personally | creditor claims remain against the company and its assets |
Reduced personal exposure can make shares more attractive and help a company raise finance. It can also alter incentives, but directors still need responsible decisions because the company can fail and creditors can lose money.
Limited liability does not mean the business has no liability, debts disappear, or shareholders cannot lose their investment. Personal guarantees may also change an owner's practical exposure.
Choosing finance begins by removing methods the business cannot legally or practically access, then matching the remaining choices to purpose, duration, cash flow, cost, security and control.
| Business and liability | Available directions | Important constraint |
|---|---|---|
| sole trader or ordinary partnership; unlimited liability | owner savings, retained profit, asset sale, family, bank borrowing, overdraft, lease, trade credit or eligible grant | cannot issue share capital; debt may expose personal assets |
| private limited company; limited liability | internal finance, borrowing and leasing, venture capital, private share capital or eligible grant | private shares cannot be offered to the public; new equity shares control |
| public limited company; limited liability | company methods plus public share capital through the market | flotation, disclosure, ownership dilution and market expectations |
For a short cash gap, compare overdraft or trade credit; for equipment, compare loan, lease, retained profit or a suitable mix. A lender may still require evidence, security or a personal guarantee, so limited liability alone never guarantees access.
Liability is one decision factor, not the whole decision. This syllabus does not require limited liability partnerships, and it is wrong to recommend share capital to a sole trader or start-up retained profit to a business with no trading history.