Indicative content guidance
Answers must be credited by using the level descriptors (below) in line
with the general marking guidance. The indicative content below
exemplifies some of the points that candidates may make but this does
not imply that any of these must be included. Other relevant points
must also be credited.
Knowledge, Application, Analysis, Evaluation - indicative
content
- Consumers are becoming much more aware of the impact of
business activities on the environment particularly industries which
rely on fossil fuels
- IAG is responsible for 3% of global CO2 emissions and needs to
show its stakeholders that it is committed to reducing its impact
on the environment with a strong environmental strategy
- By doing this BA may improve its branding and PR if they are seen
to be aiming for net zero-emissions and recycling their waste
compared to other airlines which may result in higher sales/profits
in the long term
- BA might be able to gain a competitive advantage over its rivals
by being seen to be more environmentally friendly, thereby
increasing market share
- BA may gain first mover advantage by being the first major airline
to announce it is aiming for net zero-emissions by 2050
- BA will be able to reduce costs in terms of the amount of fuel used
on flights which may increase overall profits
- However, offsetting, recycling and reduction of waste from flights
will require management time to organise the recycling of waste
from the flights which may impact on overall workload for cabin
crew
- Being ethical often costs more in terms of recycling waste and
disposing ethically of waste from airline food packaging rather
than letting local authorities be responsible for waste
- BA admit that they can only offset rather than completely reduce
their carbon footprint due to having to use fossil fuels for their
aircraft
- Some customers do not value being ethical and prefer to have
flights at the lowest possible cost so this could make BA less
competitive compared to other airlines that do not recycle
Level
Mark
Descriptor
0
No rewardable material.
Level 1
1-2
Isolated elements of knowledge and understanding - recall based.
Weak or no relevant application to business examples.
Generic assertions may be presented.
Level 2
3-4
Elements of knowledge and understanding, which are applied to the business example.
Chains of reasoning are presented, but may be assertions or incomplete.
A generic or superficial assessment is presented.
Level 3
5-8
Accurate and thorough knowledge and understanding, supported throughout by relevant and effective use of the business behaviour/context.
Analytical perspectives are presented, with developed chains of reasoning, showing cause(s) and/or effect(s).
An attempt at an assessment is presented, using quantitative and/or qualitative information though unlikely to show the significance of competing arguments.
Level 4
9-12
Accurate and thorough knowledge and understanding, supported throughout by relevant and effective use of the business behaviour/context.
A coherent and logical chain of reasoning, showing cause(s) and/or effect(s).
Assessment is balanced, wide ranging and well contextualised, using quantitative and/or qualitative information and shows an awareness of competing arguments/factors leading to a supported judgement.
Question
Indicative content