CAIE A-Level Economics 3.3.4 Redistribution policies
Practise judging how governments redistribute income and wealth through taxes, transfers, minimum wages and essential services.
- Syllabus
- 2026–2028
- Course
- Economics 9708
- Level
- AS
Practise judging how governments redistribute income and wealth through taxes, transfers, minimum wages and essential services.
Chile is the world's biggest copper producer with 28% of global copper production and the second biggest producer of lithium with 22% of world production. Overall, mining contributes 11% of the country's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and more than 50% of the value of the country's total exports. World copper and lithium prices have increased quickly since 2020. This has led to strong growth in GDP which is expected to increase by 3.5% in 2022, exceeding earlier estimates of 2.5% as world demand is expected to grow following the Covid-19 pandemic. Fig 1.1 shows the world price of copper in United States dollars (US$) per pound (lb) weight. A pound is 454 grammes.

Fig 1.1: World copper price, 2017 to 2022
Economic growth in Chile has also been helped by the world's highest rate of vaccination against Covid-19 and a rapid economic recovery from the pandemic which has led to a large increase in consumer spending.
However, the trade in goods surplus has fallen substantially in February 2022. This is mainly because of a 9.2% fall in the revenue from copper exports due to the higher prices and a fall in world demand during the Covid-19 pandemic. There has also been a 38.3% increase in the value of imported consumer goods. As a consequence, the current account deficit has widened substantially to US$7.5bn in the first quarter of 2022 from a deficit of US$1.1bn in the first quarter of 2021 despite a surplus of US $50 m in the secondary income account.

Fig 1.2: Chile's balance of trade in goods, March 2021 to February 2022
One of the main benefits of Chile's increased prosperity in recent years has been a decline in the number of people living at or below the minimum income level of US $5.50 per day. However, Chile remains the most unequal country in the list of largely developed countries according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) with an income gap 65% wider than the OECD average. In addition, although the Gini coefficient has fallen from 52.1 to 44.4, this is still higher than lower-income countries such as Haiti and El Salvador.
To try and reduce this inequality in income and wealth, the Chilean government has increased its expenditure on education from 3% of GDP in 1997 to 5.4% in 2018. Further recognition of the importance of education as a merit good is shown by the government increasing its education spending by 3.4% each year since 2018. Chile has also recently made all college tuition free of charge. It is hoped that this will reduce the gap in the quality of education received by the wealthiest and poorest students and open up opportunities for everyone.
Sources: Adapted from reuters.com 2 February 2022, trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/chile-mining, 25 January 2022, bcentral.cl/inicio and statista.com, April 2022
Assess the extent to which 'the government increasing its education spending' may improve the incomes of poorer households in Chile.
Up to 4 marks for the explanation / analysis:
For an explanation of the reasons / benefits of the government increasing education spending to improve the incomes of poorer households (Up to 3 marks). These may include:
- As the data makes clear, education is considered a merit good that is considered to be beneficial for the individual and society in e.g., raising income levels due to a better educated and skilled workforce.
- Additional spending may increase the availability of education provision and free college tuition fees may make it more affordable to poorer households.
- Increased provision may also reduce other costs of education, again making it more affordable and accessible.
- It may raise awareness of the benefits of education for poorer households.
For an explanation of why increased government spending on education may not have the desired effects (Up to 3 marks). These may include:
- There may still be a lack of awareness of the benefits of education due to information failure.
- Poorer households may have higher opportunity costs due to the need to start earning an income at an earlier age.
- Government spending may be unsustainable leading to reductions in future spending.
•
Max: 4 marks
Note: maximum of 3 marks if only one side is considered.
Up to 2 marks for evaluation (no marks if only one side is considered):
- That assesses the advantages and disadvantages of just increasing government expenditure on education to improve living standards of poorer households, this may include an assessment of the time for the policy to have the desired effect i.e., the extent (1), leading to
- A valid conclusion (1).