CAIE A-Level Economics AS 3.1 Reasons for Government Intervention in Markets Questions

Practise explaining why public goods may be unprovided and merit or demerit goods misallocated, then evaluating whether government action improves on market outcomes.

Syllabus
2026–2028
Course
Economics 9708
Level
AS

Exam points

  • distinguish public, merit and demerit goods using exclusion, rivalry and information evidence
  • explain free riding or underconsumption and overconsumption as sources of misallocation
  • evaluate direct provision, information, taxes or subsidies against costs and government failure

Question 1

[Maximum number: 1]

A government wishes to ensure adequate flood defences are provided in its coastal areas.
Which action is most likely to be undertaken only by the government?

A

building the defences

B

designing the defences

C

financing the defences

D

maintaining the defences

Question 2

[Maximum number: 1]

Which combination of government measures is most likely to increase the consumption of a merit good?

A

setting an effective maximum price on the product and paying producers a subsidy

B

setting an effective maximum price on the product and imposing an indirect tax on producers

C

setting an effective minimum price on the product and paying producers a subsidy

D

setting an effective minimum price on the product and imposing an indirect tax on producers

Question 3

[Maximum number: 1]

In many countries there are goods that must be provided directly by the government.
What would be the most convincing argument for such provision?

A

The consumption of these products may be beneficial.

B

The production of these products may be harmful.

C

The production of these products have high opportunity costs.

D

These products are non-rival in consumption and non-excludable.

All question bank results loaded