Q BankQuestion BankDocsDocuments

1.2.3—Plant and animal cell comparison

Syllabus
9700–2028–2029
Objective
1.2.3
Level
AS

Plant and animal cells share a core plan but specialise differently

Plant and animal cells are both eukaryotic, so they share a core plan of membrane, cytoplasm, nucleus, mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi bodies, vesicles or lysosomes, ribosomes and microtubules. Their differences reflect how each cell gains support, materials and energy.

Feature Plant cells Animal cells
Cell surface membrane and cytoplasm Present; membrane controls exchange Present; membrane controls exchange
Nucleus, mitochondria, ER, Golgi, vesicles/lysosomes, ribosomes and microtubules Shared eukaryotic structures Shared eukaryotic structures
Cellulose cell wall Present; provides rigid support outside the membrane Absent
Large permanent vacuole Typical; stores cell sap and supports the cell Not typical; animal vacuoles, when present, are small and temporary
Chloroplasts Present in photosynthetic cells; absorb light for photosynthesis Absent
Plasmodesmata Connect neighbouring plant-cell cytoplasm Absent
Centrioles and microvilli Not typical of flowering-plant cells Typical comparison features; centrioles organise division machinery and microvilli increase absorptive surface area

The wall and vacuole help a plant cell keep its shape, chloroplasts capture light energy, and plasmodesmata permit transfer between neighbouring plant cells. Animal cells rely more on a flexible surface membrane and external support, while specialised animal cells may use centrioles or microvilli for particular jobs.

Use the table as a comparison of typical structures, not as a rule for every specialised cell: a leaf cell may contain chloroplasts, while a mature red blood cell lacks a nucleus. Do not infer cell type from one feature or from shape alone.

ConceptA-Level CAIE Biology AS