7. Transport in Plants
- Syllabus
- 9700–2028–2029
- Section
- 7
- Level
- AS

Published Concept pages under this syllabus area do not have tagged past-paper appearances in the selected level yet.
Recent 5 years
Topic 7.1
A plant transverse-section plan diagram is a large, simple map of tissue boundaries and the requested transport tissues. It records the evidence visible in the section without copying every cell or inventing structures that cannot be seen.
The evidence-to-diagram chain is: visible tissue pattern → vascular bundle location → supported xylem/phloem identification → simplified labelled plan. Xylem transports water and mineral ions from roots, while phloem transports substances from source to sink; these functions explain why their positions matter, but the drawing itself must stay within what the section shows.
A plan diagram is not a photograph, a shaded cell drawing or a guess based only on the organ name. Preserve tissue boundaries and proportions, label only requested/identifiable structures, and separate direct observations (shape, position, contrast) from functional interpretation. Staff visual brief: show a before/after transverse-section micrograph and simplified plan with vascular bundle, xylem, phloem and clean label lines; do not generate or bind an image in this card transaction.
Xylem and phloem occur together in vascular bundles, but their relative positions change with the organ. Read the organ layout first, then identify the xylem and phloem positions rather than assuming one universal bundle pattern.
For a transverse section, use a fixed read-out: (1) name the organ from the overall pattern, (2) locate the vascular bundle or central vascular region, (3) compare inner/outer or upper/lower position, then (4) label xylem and phloem only where the evidence supports the identification. Xylem carries water and dissolved mineral ions upward and also contributes structural support; phloem transports substances from source to sink.
Do not draw roots, stems and leaves with the same bundle layout. “Xylem is inside” is useful for roots and stems, but in leaves the key comparison is that xylem is above phloem. These are relative positions in herbaceous dicot transport tissues, not a complete map of every plant organ or an invitation to infer anatomy beyond the section.
Xylem vessel elements and phloem sieve-tube elements are specialised conducting cells, while companion cells maintain and support the associated sieve-tube elements. Their mature structures differ because water/mineral transport and assimilate transport impose different constraints.
Xylem vessel elements — water and mineral-ion pathway
Phloem sieve-tube elements — assimilate pathway
Companion cells — sieve-tube support
Read the structures as an aligned comparison: conducting cell state — mature xylem vessel elements are non-living and open, whereas sieve-tube elements remain living but have reduced internal organelles; wall/connection — xylem uses lignified walls, no end plates and pits, whereas phloem uses cellulose walls and sieve plates; transport — xylem carries water and dissolved mineral ions mainly upward, while phloem carries organic assimilates up or down according to source and sink; support — xylem structure directly resists collapse, while companion-cell organelles and plasmodesmata support sieve-tube metabolism and loading/unloading.
Do not call companion cells the conducting tube or treat sieve plates as xylem end plates. Do not infer that every xylem cell has the same appearance: this objective centres on vessel elements, sieve-tube elements and their companion cells. Staff drawing brief: compare labelled longitudinal/transverse sketches of a vessel element, sieve-tube element and companion cell, showing only syllabus-supported walls, pores, organelles and connections; do not generate or bind an image.
Transport tissues work because their cell structures are matched to the materials moved and the support required. Xylem provides a strong, low-obstruction pathway for water and dissolved mineral ions; phloem combines sieve-tube conducting cells with companion-cell support for assimilate translocation.
Synthesis cue: lignified, hollow, pitted vessel structure → water/mineral conduction plus support; sieve tubes + companion cells → livingly supported assimilate translocation.
This card explains how transport-tissue structure supports transport and support functions. It does not teach transpiration, cohesion-tension, water-potential gradients or other 7.2 transport mechanisms. Do not claim that phloem always moves downwards or that all xylem tissue is one identical cell type. Staff visual brief, if later commissioned: use two causal mini-panels (xylem and phloem) with structure→function arrows; do not generate or bind an image in this transaction.
Topic 7.2
Xylem sap is water containing dissolved mineral ions. Root hairs absorb the materials from the soil, and the solution then enters xylem vessels and is transported through the root, stem and leaf system.
The apoplast is not an osmosis pathway: water in cell walls moves through freely permeable spaces. The symplast involves cell membranes, cytoplasm, vacuoles and plasmodesmata. This card ends at root entry and the xylem pathway; the later transpiration/cohesion-tension cards explain long-distance driving mechanisms. Staff-only visual brief: a root hair→cortex→endodermis/Casparian strip→xylem route with apoplast and symplast branches; do not generate or bind an image.
Water moves from soil through root hair cells, the cortex and endodermis into the xylem. Mineral-ion uptake and membrane-controlled pathways make root entry selective rather than a simple open pipe.
Path cue: soil → root hair → cortex → endodermis/Casparian strip → xylem.
Apoplast movement through cell walls is not osmosis; symplast movement includes membrane crossings and plasmodesmata. Do not use root pressure or cohesion-tension as the explanation for this radial pathway. Staff-only visual brief: show the root hair-to-xylem route with apoplast and symplast branches converging at the Casparian strip; do not generate or bind an image.
Transpiration is the loss of water vapour from a plant, mainly through stomata in the leaves. Water evaporates from moist mesophyll cell walls into the leaf air spaces, then the vapour diffuses out through open stomata.
Path cue: mesophyll cell wall → leaf air space → stomatal pore → atmosphere.
Do not call transpiration photosynthesis, guttation or the whole xylem pathway. The observable process defined here is evaporation at mesophyll surfaces followed by vapour diffusion through stomata. Staff-only visual brief: show mesophyll wall → leaf air space → stomatal pore → atmosphere, with guard-cell control and a separate liquid-xylem arrow; do not generate or bind an image.
The cohesion-tension theory explains how evaporation at leaves can help move a continuous column of water up xylem. Evaporation creates tension (negative pressure) in the xylem; cohesion transmits that pull through water molecules, while adhesion helps keep the column against the xylem walls.
Causal cue: evaporation → xylem tension/transpiration pull → cohesion transmits pull → adhesion and lignified walls support the column → water moves upward.
Root pressure can assist entry and raise xylem pressure, but it is not the complete explanation for normal long-distance ascent.
Hydrogen bonding does not act as a pump by itself: evaporation supplies the initial pull, while cohesion and adhesion transmit/support it. This mechanism card explains the water column and xylem ascent; card 4590 defines the transpiration process, and card 4592 concerns xerophytic water-loss adaptations. Staff-only visual brief: show leaf evaporation, tension arrow down a continuous xylem water column, cohesion links, adhesion to cellulose wall and lignified-wall support; do not generate or bind an image.
Xerophytes are adapted to dry conditions. Their leaf features conserve water by reducing the exposed evaporating surface, increasing resistance to water-vapour diffusion, trapping humid air, or limiting the time when stomata are open.
Mechanism check: feature → altered exposed area, diffusion distance, humidity or stomatal opening → reduced water loss.
Not every xerophytic leaf has every listed feature. Identify the feature actually shown and explain its specific effect on the water-loss pathway; do not infer a complete xerophyte package from one adaptation. Water conservation can also constrain gaseous exchange, so “reduced transpiration” does not mean all plant exchange stops. Staff-only visual brief: annotated leaf cross-section with cuticle, sunken/hairy stomata and rolled humid space; do not generate or bind an image.
Phloem translocation is the transport of assimilates from a source, where they are available, to a sink, where they are stored or used. Phloem sap is a solution containing mainly sucrose as well as water and other dissolved substances such as amino acids, hormones and minerals.
Reasoning cue: identify the current source and sink → identify the assimilate in phloem sap → trace the sieve-tube pathway → state why direction and loading demand are context-dependent.
Phloem is not simply a downward sugar tube and is not the same transport system as xylem. Source/sink status is functional and can change; pressure-driven mass flow is explained in the later card. Do not use ATP as if it directly pushes every assimilate along the whole plant. No image is needed for this card.
Companion cells load assimilates such as sucrose into phloem sieve tubes. The route may be symplastic and passive, or—when sucrose takes the apoplastic route—may use ATP-dependent proton pumping and H⁺–sucrose co-transport.
Chain cue: ATP → proton pump → H⁺ gradient → H⁺–sucrose co-transport → companion cell → plasmodesmata → sieve tube.
Do not invent a named transporter or say ATP pushes every sucrose molecule along the entire plant. ATP powers the local proton pump; co-transport loads sucrose, while later mass flow is the long-distance process. Unloading occurs at sinks and may use apoplastic or symplastic routes, but its full pressure-flow consequence belongs to 4595. No image is generated for this card.
The pressure-flow hypothesis explains phloem mass flow: active sucrose loading at a source lowers the water potential of phloem sap, water enters by osmosis and raises source turgor pressure, and unloading at a sink lowers pressure there. Sap therefore moves in bulk down a hydrostatic pressure gradient.
Chain cue: source loading → lower phloem water potential → water entry → high source turgor → mass flow → sink unloading → water exit/lower sink pressure.
Mass flow is not diffusion of sucrose molecules one by one, and ATP is used locally to establish loading/pressure differences rather than to push every molecule along the whole tube. This card explains the pressure-flow model; it does not claim exact pressure values or make all phloem movement globally one-way. Staff-only visual brief: source and sink with water arrows, pressure labels and a single-direction sieve-tube arrow; show a second tube in the opposite direction only to represent different source-sink pairs. Do not generate or bind an image.