3. Enzymes
- Syllabus
- 9700–2028–2029
- Section
- 3
- Level
- AS

Published Concept pages under this syllabus area do not have tagged past-paper appearances in the selected level yet.
Recent 5 years
Topic 3.1
An enzyme is a globular protein that acts as a biological catalyst. It speeds up a chemical reaction by providing a pathway with lower activation energy, without being used up or permanently changed.
Catalase is an intracellular example that breaks down hydrogen peroxide, a harmful by-product of cellular reactions. Amylase is an extracellular digestive example that breaks starch into smaller sugars. The examples illustrate location and role; they do not mean an enzyme is consumed by the reaction.
“Intracellular” and “extracellular” describe where an enzyme acts, not whether an organism is single-celled or multicellular. Enzymes are proteins, so conditions that disrupt protein structure can impair activity, but the catalytic reaction itself does not use the enzyme up.
An enzyme’s active site is a three-dimensional region whose shape and chemical groups are complementary to a particular substrate. Specific binding creates a temporary enzyme–substrate complex and positions the reactants for catalysis.
The protein’s tertiary structure determines the active-site shape, so a change in amino-acid sequence can change the site and enzyme specificity. Complementary binding is therefore the gate for the reaction; a collision with the wrong shape need not produce a complex or products.
The active site does not permanently lock the substrate in place, and the enzyme is not used up. Lower activation energy increases reaction rate through an alternative route; it does not change the overall energy difference or move the equilibrium. The small binding adjustment described by induced fit is developed in the next card.
The lock-and-key model is a useful first explanation of enzyme specificity because it shows a complementary substrate and active site. The induced-fit hypothesis extends this model: binding causes a small adjustment in the enzyme’s active site, and sometimes in the substrate, so the final complex is better arranged for catalysis.
Lock-and-key emphasises a pre-existing rigid complementarity. Induced fit keeps the idea of selective binding but explains why the active site can adjust around a suitable substrate to improve catalysis.
Induced fit is not permanent deformation or denaturation, and it does not make every molecule a suitable substrate. Card 4542 covers the general collision–complex–product process; this card explains the binding model. Rate measurement is handled separately in card 4544.
Enzyme activity is the rate of an enzyme-catalysed reaction: how much substrate is used or product is formed per unit time. In general, rate = change in measured amount ÷ time taken, using a consistent signal and time interval.
A faster reaction changes the chosen product or substrate signal more quickly, so it has a steeper initial gradient. The initial section is preferred because later progress can slow as substrate is depleted, products accumulate or another experimental limit is reached.
Do not call a single endpoint amount an enzyme rate, and do not infer a rate from unequal time intervals without accounting for time. This card defines the general progress-over-time method; the separate colorimetry card explains how a colour signal is calibrated into quantitative readings.
Colorimetry measures how much light a coloured sample absorbs or transmits. When the colour is linked to a substrate or product, the reading acts as a concentration proxy, allowing enzyme progress to be followed more objectively than judging colour by eye.
A changing colour changes the amount of light absorbed or transmitted; calibration connects that reading to concentration; repeated timed readings then connect concentration change to enzyme rate. In a starch–amylase example, iodine colour decreases as starch is hydrolysed, so the calibrated decline in starch can be followed over time.
Absorbance or transmission is not automatically a concentration or a rate: the blank, standards, timing, cuvette handling and usable calibration range support that inference. This card does not assume a particular wavelength, unit or instrument specification.
Topic 3.2
Compare enzyme factors through the bottleneck they change: successful enzyme–substrate collisions, the number of usable active sites, or the shape and function of those sites. Enzyme rate means the initial change in product or substrate signal per unit time, not simply the final amount.
For a fair factor comparison, vary one factor while controlling the others, including temperature, pH, enzyme and substrate concentrations, volumes, mixing and measurement time. Plot the chosen progress signal against time and compare initial gradients; do not infer a rate from unequal endpoint amounts or from a plateau alone.
Avoid absolute statements such as “higher temperature” or “more enzyme” always increases rate. The direction and curve shape depend on the optimum, denaturation, substrate availability, active-site saturation and inhibitor type. Exact optimum values are enzyme-specific and are not assumed here.
On a graph of initial reaction rate, v, against substrate concentration, [S], Vmax is the capacity ceiling approached when the enzyme’s active sites are saturated. Km is the substrate concentration at which the initial rate is half of Vmax.
v=2Vmaxwhen[S]=Km
Worked read-off: if a curve approaches a clear plateau, label that plateau Vmax, mark its midpoint on the rate axis, and project from the midpoint through the curve to the substrate axis. The substrate-axis reading at that intercept is Km; do not read Km at the plateau itself.
Km is not the substrate concentration at Vmax. A lower Km can indicate higher apparent affinity only when the same model and comparable conditions apply; Vmax also depends on the amount of active enzyme. Read initial-rate data and do not invent precision beyond the graph.
Initial rate comes from the earliest linear part of a product–time or substrate–time record, before substrate depletion, product accumulation or drifting conditions begin to change the rate.
initial rate=ΔtΔproduct formedor−ΔtΔsubstrate
Keep the comparison fair:
If product concentration rises by 12 µmol dm⁻³ during the first 30 s linear interval, the initial rate is 12 ÷ 30 = 0.40 µmol dm⁻³ s⁻¹. Apply the same interval rule to every treatment.
An endpoint amount is not an initial rate. A fixed endpoint can hide an early rate difference, while uncontrolled temperature or pH can imitate a concentration effect.
Reversible inhibitors reduce enzyme activity by limiting productive enzyme–substrate complexes. The binding site determines whether adding more substrate can recover the maximum rate.
| Feature | Competitive inhibitor | Non-competitive inhibitor |
|---|---|---|
| Binding site | Similar enough to the substrate to compete for the active site | Binds at an alternative site and changes the functional active-site shape |
| Vmax in the standard comparison | Unchanged when enough substrate eventually outcompetes the inhibitor | Decreased because some enzyme capacity remains functionally unavailable |
| Apparent Km in the standard comparison | Increased: more substrate is needed to reach half of the unchanged Vmax | Unchanged in the simple non-competitive model used here |
| Rate–substrate curve | Shifted to the right but approaches the same plateau | Lies below the uninhibited curve and approaches a lower plateau |
| Can more substrate recover the maximum? | Yes, in principle, because substrate and inhibitor compete for the same site | No, because extra substrate cannot restore the altered active site |
Active-site competition lowers the chance that a substrate occupies the site at a given concentration, so increasing substrate can restore productive binding and the original maximum. Alternative-site binding changes the active site on affected enzyme molecules, so increasing substrate cannot recover the lost catalytic capacity. Read Vmax and Km from matched initial-rate saturation curves, not from one inhibitor point.
End-product inhibition is a reversible control example: as the final product accumulates, it binds at an alternative site on an earlier enzyme and slows the pathway. When product concentration falls, inhibition is relieved and the pathway can resume.
The table uses the standard simplified comparison: real data must be judged from the whole curve and matched conditions. Do not identify inhibitor type from one rate value, call alternative-site binding harmless, or introduce irreversible inhibition into this objective.
A free enzyme is added to the reaction solution. An immobilised enzyme is bound to an inert, stationary, insoluble support such as alginate, while substrate is brought to the support and product is collected separately.
| Feature | Free enzyme | Immobilised enzyme |
|---|---|---|
| Reaction system | Enzyme is mixed into the solution with the substrate | Enzyme is retained on an insoluble support; substrate must reach the support |
| Access and observed rate | Direct mixing can make substrate access rapid | Access through/around the support can limit the observed rate |
| Product separation | Enzyme remains mixed with the product | Product can be collected without carrying the enzyme into the product |
| Recovery and reuse | Recovery from the reaction mixture is difficult | Support can be retained and the enzyme reused for repeated processing |
| Stability and process control | Conditions act directly on enzyme in solution | Immobilisation can increase tolerance of pH and temperature changes and supports controlled processing |
In a supported lactase process, milk is passed over alginate beads containing lactase. Lactose is hydrolysed to glucose and galactose while the enzyme remains associated with the support, allowing the product stream to be collected and the preparation reused.
Immobilisation does not make an enzyme permanently stable, guarantee a faster rate, or justify claims that enzyme can never leave the support. Judge the measured system using matched controls and the same time basis; do not invent column dimensions or other apparatus specifications.
A rate change is evidence about the current bottleneck, not an explanation by itself. Ask whether the observation is best explained by collision frequency, substrate availability, usable active-site capacity, enzyme shape or diffusion.
To make a valid conclusion, change one factor, control the others, compare initial rates and stay within the tested range. A single point cannot establish a curve shape or inhibitor type.