IB ESS HL 4.4 Water Pollution Questions
Practise IB ESS HL 4.4 by analysing direct tests, biotic indices and WQI evidence and evaluating pollution controls and coordinated action.
- Syllabus
- First assessment 2026
- Course
- ESS HL
- Level
- HL
Practise IB ESS HL 4.4 by analysing direct tests, biotic indices and WQI evidence and evaluating pollution controls and coordinated action.
A small lake is going through the process of eutrophication. State one possible point source and one possible non-point source of nutrient pollution in the lake.
Point source:
Non-point source:
point source: sewage outfall/effluent pipe;
non-point source: agricultural/erosion/run-off/leaching of fertilizers in a large area;
Marking guidance:
Do not accept acid rain.
Define the term biochemical oxygen demand (BOD).
a measure of the amount of dissolved oxygen required to break down the organic material (in a given volume of water through aerobic biological activity);
Figure:pH-tolerance ranges of freshwater organisms
The pH-tolerance chart shows the ranges over which aquatic organisms in a small lake can survive.
Use the pH-tolerance ranges of freshwater organisms: the pH tolerance ranges of trout, bass, perch, frogs, salamanders, clams, crayfish, snails and mayfly in the small lake.
State which organism(s) would still be present if the pH of the lake was reduced to 5.0.
trout, perch, salamanders and frogs;
All four required to award [1].
Use the pH-tolerance ranges of freshwater organisms: the pH tolerance ranges of trout, bass, perch, frogs, salamanders, clams, crayfish, snails and mayfly in the small lake.
Explain why the populations of remaining organisms in the lake may decline in the long term.
these species will be at the limits of their tolerance;
may have reduced health;
may have reduced reproductive success;
these species are relatively high in the food chain;
loss of food species;
may be exposed to additional pollutants e.g. heavy metals;
Allow any other reasonable suggestions. Award [2 max].
Many countries produce large amounts of solid domestic waste. Pacific Ocean currents concentrate and trap solid domestic waste from the Pacific Rim countries and have created the Great Pacific Garbage Patch (GPGP) in the North Pacific Gyre (Figure 5).
Figure 6:Consumption and disposal of plastic waste for India and selected Pacific Rim countries
* Estimated for 2017 based on 10% growth.
Identify one reason why most plastics may be considered more serious pollutants than other forms of solid domestic waste.
plastics produced in huge quantities/very widespread (due to usefulness/versatility);
plastics are non-biodegradable / may take hundreds of years to fully degrade / generational problem;
marine animals may be killed through entanglement/suffocation/ingestion leading to starvation;
degraded smaller particles can be easily and widely dispersed;
degraded plastic may become more toxic by absorbing other toxins/releasing POPs;
microparticles can be absorbed by species causing biomagnification/damage to food chains;
Explain why the data in Figure 6 show no correlation between plastic consumption and plastic waste deposited in ocean for the countries listed.
laws/policies against depositing plastic in sea may be less stringent/well-enforced in some countries (eg China);
some countries may have greater discharge from rivers into sea (eg China);
some countries may have greater population densities near to coast (eg India/China);
some countries may have more efficient garbage disposal/recycling systems (eg Japan/USA);
industrialisation involving plastic production/use may have higher priority in some countries (eg China/India);
estimated data may be inaccurate/unrepresentative/based on false assumptions;
data may be politically biased/not verified independently;
Part (c) questions in Section B are all to be assessed using the markbands on page 18 with the guidance given below for each question.
Figure:Coliform bacteria one day after untreated sewage release
Using Figure 11(b), estimate the highest concentrations of coliform bacteria (in units/100 mL) found in the St Lawrence River one day after the untreated sewage was released.
120000 (units / 100 ml );
Units are not required.
Outline an environmental problem that may result from the release of untreated sewage into a river.
• Eutrophication / algal bloom — due to high levels of nitrates and phosphates/nutrients.
• Hypoxic conditions — due to high oxygen demand.
• Rotten egg smell / production of hydrogen sulphide — due to anaerobic decomposition.
• Increase in micro-organisms/pathogens within shellfish — due to pathogens being filtered out of the water.
• Ill health in people / increase in waterborne disease — from eating shellfish/fish contaminated with pathogens/bacteria (from sewage), swimming in water contaminated with pathogens/bacteria (from sewage), or drinking water contaminated with pathogens/bacteria.
• Death/loss of benthic species — due to particulates blocking feeding/respiratory systems.
• Decrease in photosynthesis — due to increase in turbidity (reducing light penetration).
Accept any other reasonable response. Answer must have the named problem and the associated outline for both marks.
Do not accept 'thermal pollution/increase in temperature'.
Do not accept just 'loss of biodiversity / water unsuitable for human use'.
Figure:Coliform bacteria before untreated sewage release
Montreal:
In November 2015, the City of Montreal discharged between 5 and 8 billion litres of untreated sewage into the St Lawrence River.
• It was called “FlushGate” in the Canadian news.
• Citizens were warned to avoid contact with the water.
• River pollution levels returned to normal within 4 to 10 days.
• The Mayor of Montreal described it as the “most environmentally-friendly solution”.
Quebec:
In November 2016, the City of Quebec discharged 110 million litres of untreated sewage into the St Lawrence River.
Nationally:
• 25 % of Canadians do not have access to sewage or wastewater treatment centres.
• 205 billion litres of untreated sewage are released into Canadian rivers and oceans each year.
With reference to Figures 10, 11(a) and 11(b), describe a method to monitor the impact of the release of untreated sewage into the St Lawrence River ecosystem.
can use indirect or direct measures of pollution;
direct measurements of dissolved oxygen using a probe / light and dark bottle method to measure BOD / direct counts of coliform units using microscopes / Secchi disc to monitor turbidity / titration to measure changes in nitrates/phosphates;
freshwater invertebrates can be used as indicator species;
compare with historic data / take measurements before the release of the untreated sewage (for 'normal' measurements);
take measurements along the length of the river, from the point source downstream (to determine area impacted);
take measurements over a period of time, to observe changes in water quality;
A small lake is going through the process of eutrophication. State one possible point source and one possible non-point source of nutrient pollution in the lake.
Point source:
Non-point source:
point source: sewage outfall/effluent pipe;
non-point source: agricultural/erosion/run-off/leaching of fertilizers in a large area;
Marking guidance:
Do not accept acid rain.
Figure:Canterbury region and the Selwyn/Waikirikiri River
Figure:Agriculture within the Canterbury Plains
Figure:Cattle numbers, the Canterbury region, New Zealand, 1990–2019
Figure 5(b): Fact file on the Canterbury region
Canterbury is the largest region in New Zealand by area. It includes the Canterbury Plains, New Zealand’s largest area of flat land, used for intensive farming including wheat, barley, sheep and cattle (dairy and beef). The region produces the majority of New Zealand’s grains and crops.
Describe a method that could be used to monitor biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) on the Selwyn (Waikirikiri) River within the Canterbury Plains.
a. Water samples could be taken at various points along the river;
b. Water could be tested for BOD by taking samples and measuring oxygen concentration at start / initial oxygen concentration is measured in the sample;
c. Incubate samples for ( 5 days at 20∘C ) in the dark;
d. Measure reduction in oxygen concentration after 5 days;
e. Example of method e.g. dissolved oxygen can be measured using an oxygen probe/test kit/titration;
f. Testing could be repeated at different time intervals (and compared to previous results);
Outline one disadvantage of using BOD measurements as an assessment of pollution.
a. Takes minimum of 5 days to get results / long time lag for results;
b. Measures only (biodegradable) organic pollution (indirectly);
c. Not all water pollution impacts BOD;
d. Toxic substances can kill micro-organisms which affects results;
e. It is an indirect measure of pollution rather than measuring pollutants directly/damage caused to species;
f. Does not identify/measure actual/specific pollutant eg pathogens/heavy metals;
g. Snapshot in time / only represents the moment the sample was taken;
Do not accept "it is not accurate".
Do not accept "it does not identify the source of pollution".
Do not accept "it is expensive".
| Pollutant | Unit | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | kt | 32.80 | 32.60 | 31.30 | 37.10 | 32.90 |
| Phosphate | kt | 4.50 | 4.40 | 4.00 | 4.80 | 4.40 |
| Lead | kg | 186.18 | 215.91 | 201.00 | 41.21 | 3.57 |
| Arsenic | kg | 28.09 | 21.34 | 15.11 | 8.00 | 11.04 |
| Mercury | kg | 1.72 | 0.49 | 0.64 | 0.10 | 0.33 |
| Cadmium | kg | 12.44 | 17.90 | 17.45 | 0.58 | 0.70 |
| Chromium | kg | 508.68 | 460.10 | 438.05 | 266.65 | 93.59 |
Figure 9(d): Pollutants in wastewater discharged into Beijing rivers, 2011-2015
With reference to Figure 9(d), identify the year in which eutrophication was most likely to have occurred.
2014.
Only mark the first answer if more than one year is given.
With reference to natural cycles and human activities, outline the process of eutrophication.
eutrophication is an increase in nutrients in an aquatic ecosystem;
nutrients added from decomposing biomass / natural run-off from surrounding areas (natural cycles);
seasonal temperature inversion/turnover/upwelling currents bringing nutrients to surface (natural cycles);
similarly run-off from agricultural land/artificial fertiliser/fertilisers/slurry adds nutrients to water (human activities);
domestic waste water contains phosphates and nitrates/detergents/non-treated sewage(human activities);
Marking guidance:
[3 max] for causes and [2 max] if only natural or human causes are mentioned. both human and natural eutrophication leads to increase in biomass of algae initially/rapid algae growth;
the algae increase turbidity/lower the light penetration to underwater plants;
increased death of algae/underwater plants leads to increase in DOM/bacteria;
increased bacteria increase BOD which leads to lowered oxygen content of water/causes hypoxia;
lowered oxygen leads to stagnation/anaerobic bacteria/death of many organisms;
human induced eutrophication happens a lot faster than natural eutrophication/on a bigger scale;
[4 max] for outline of eutrophication
Figure Diagram showing the expanse of the Mississippi River basin draining into the Gulf of Mexico
Figure Pie charts showing sources of nutrients delivered to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River
Explain how nutrient pollution could impact aquatic food production in the Gulf of Mexico.
a. Excess nutrients can lead to algae blooms/eutrophication...;
b. ...blocking sunlight that results in aquatic plant death/reduced primary productivity;
c. reducing oxygen source in water;
d. Aquatic organisms/fish die/reduced secondary productivity from lack of oxygen;
e. Decomposition triggers positive feedback loop of death and decomposition, reducing oxygen further;
f. Dead zones which kill fish/aquatic organisms negatively affecting food production/capture fisheries;
g. Toxins from certain types of alga form, impacting shellfish harvests due to (paralytic) shellfish poisoning;
Note to examiners: Max 3 for only describing eutrophication feedback loop without linking to food production.
No credit for biomagnification/bioaccumulation up the food chain
Evaluate two strategies for preventing eutrophication.
Strategy: [1max]
a. Avoid use of inorganic fertilisers by education / switch to organic fertilisers via taxes/laws;
Pros: [2max]
b. Eliminates origin of problem;
c. Organic fertilisers may be gained cheaply from natural waste;
d. Organic fertilisers provide slow release of nitrates/phosphates;
e. Education should have long-term impacts, especially if addressed to young generations;
f. Reduces GHG emissions/energy use during manufacturing of synthetic fertilizers;
Cons: [2max]
g. May reduce productivity;
h. Involves a change of farming practice that may not be popular;
i. Leads to inflation/passing higher prices to consumers;
j. Educational programs/laws/taxes need to be enforced effectively;
k. Taxes/laws may be unpopular/considered coercive;
Strategy: [1max]
l. Plant buffer zones to prevent agricultural run off;
Pros: [2max]
m. Prevents nitrates/phosphates from entering nearby water bodies;
n. Increases biodiversity of farmlands;
o. Low cost solution;
p. Reduces soil erosion;
Cons: [2max]
q. Requires considerable labour in short term;
r. Takes up space that could be used for more crops;
s. Heavy rainfall may overwhelm the buffer zone;
t. Does not eliminate origin of pollution;
Strategy: [1max]
u. Phosphate stripping/nitrate removal at sewage/domestic wastewater treatment facilities;
Pros: [2max]
v. Prevents phosphates/nitrates from reaching water bodies / completely removes from water;
w. Biological removal decreases sludge production;
x. Physical removal recovers phosphorus for re-use;
y. Some methods of phosphate stripping are considered cost-effective / fit for LEDCs, too;
Cons: [2max]
z. Chemical precipitation/removal results in more toxic sludge;
aa. Usually require high initial investment / high operational costs / large-scale facilities;
bb. Require continuous monitoring / high expertise;
Note to examiners: Credit any valid advantage or disadvantage of up to two valid strategies. If more than two strategies are evaluated, credit the two that gain the more marks and ignore the other strategies.
Do not credit similar evaluative KSs for both strategies (e.g MPm & MPv will get mark once, but allow both MPb & MPt).
Do not credit restoration strategies.
To get the strategy mark, there should be a little more than just naming;
especially for strategies like "construction of a dam" or "scrubbers reducing NOx" there should be outline of how these strategies would prevent eutrophication. Still allow ECF.
With reference to Figures: Probability of lead exposure for condors by diet and Figure: Lead and non-lead bullets after impact:
State the term for a species that is used to measure pollution levels.
biotic index/indicator species;
Describe methods that could be used to assess the impact of an industrial effluent on the biotic index of a river.
a. Identify sites at intervals upstream and downstream from point of effluence;
b. Take sufficient samples to be statistically significant;
c. Lay down a quadrat on river bed;
d. Hold net downstream of quadrat;
e. Kick/disturb substrate in quadrat;
f. Empty net contents into tray;
g. Identify different species using identification key or similar;
h. Estimate abundance of tolerant and sensitive species;
i. Return all invertebrates to sample site;
j. Use data to calculate Biotic Index;
k. Compare biotic indices upstream and downstream of effluence;
Note to examiners: Do not credit methods for direct measurement of pollution, BOD or Simpsons index - Q specifically addresses biotic index.