Ways that O S could modify its marketing mix to match and compete with the new competitors.
- Product: Changing its product range (either contracting or expanding its product range).
- Price: Adopting a different pricing strategy.
- Place: Modifying its distribution strategy to include e-commerce.
- Promotion: Initiate a more aggressive promotion strategy.
For each of the four Ps, OS could make modifications. Modifying each has advantages and disadvantages. For example, contracting its product range could give the organization more focus and require lesser investment in stock. On the other hand, assuming that O S process its products properly, each inventory item makes some contribution to fixed costs. Further, any termination of a product line means that customers for that product, however few, will have to go to a competitor for that product.
OS could modify its prices, particularly try being more aggressive with its pricing. Whereas that may attract more customers (advantage), margins will be thinner.
An ecommerce shift with a door-to-door aspect will change OS′ supply chain considerably. Time and resources will need to be devoted to this task
There is a sense that O S is a traditional business and new aggressive forms of pricing and promotion will be required. Will they know how to do the latter? Do they need to introduce a social media campaign backed up with a membership or loyalty programme?
Candidates are expected to provide a conclusion with a substantiated judgment.
Grade according to the mark bands found on page 3.
For one relevant modification to the marketing mix that is one-sided, award a maximum of [3].
For two relevant modifications, but the discussion of both is one-sided, award a maximum of [4].
For two relevant modifications, one treated in a balanced way and another in an unbalanced way, award a maximum of [5].
For two relevant modifications, both treated in balanced ways, but no real conclusion, award a maximum of [6]. Conclusions must be more than nominal (for example, when a candidate opens a final paragraph with "In conclusion . . ." but then has no real conclusion), award a maximum of [6].