(ii) Explain the limitations of the 2013 break-even chart from part (i) as a decision-making tool for Icarus.
Given the nature of this project being perceived as extremely risky and unique, break-even alone cannot provide enough information as a decision
making tool.
There are weaknesses in a break-even analysis model: the linear nature of the cost and revenue diagrams based on the assumption that costs and price are constant. New competition may reduce Icarus' ability to increase prices. We have limited information about how costs could further change, for example, due to economies of scale. There is the assumption that all rooms are sold-which might not be a realistic assumption given the potential risk/danger that consumers may perceive.
No probabilities or qualitative and quantitative risk are attached to the model as it might be difficult to predict some external influences that might impact on a trip to outer space.
The model ignores any qualitative issues like the reaction of the employees who need training, or new and future competition in this market. It would be wise for Icarus to examine other models and to use other marketing and business tools such as investment appraisal, before reaching its final decision.
Award [1 mark] for each relevant limitation explained.
Award [1 mark] for explaining each limitation in context / application to Icarus up to [2 marks] per limitation.
Award a maximum of [3 marks].